DrRingDing
'anti-human wanker'
Ian is older than his dad, then
Who are you?
Ian is older than his dad, then
87% of science supports my calculations.Note the FACTS in this post.
London is London. IIRC you need to be an inhabitant to be able to vote.
If I had the slightest doubt that article would have removed it, we are faced with an unelected government we can never change as opposed to a bunch of wankers and pig gobblers who, if the electorate ever comes to its senses, we can get rid of, no contest!
If his decision leads to an out vote? Gannon BorisModern politics.
Who needs facts when politicians misrepresent, ignore, spin, exaggerate, hide, confuse, switch, engineer, underplay, dismiss and just plain fabricate facts as and how they please.
It's too much like hard work for the voting plebs to find out the facts for themselves. So people are more than happy to just take the word of famous people. The more famous the better. Doesn't matter how they got famous. They must be doing something right.
Note the FACTS in this post.
Possibly, but that person has no right to moan ABOUT FACTS after that post.Aye, but it's not going to be decided on facts is it? It's going to be decided on spin and presentation, more the pity.
Not sure it makes much odds tbh. Whatever the exact motivation behind Leave activists or voters the effect of them winning will be to erect a wall of border and residency bureaucracy where it doesn't currently exist. Refugees and others from outside the EU already face a wall. EU citizens currently don't, but will in the event of Brexit. All of them/us.
As for "lack of democratic accountability", I haven't noticed any in the negotiations Cameron has been carrying out. Some tosh about in-work benefits, a populist but financially irrelevant hit on children and something incomprehensible about protecting the City. Was that what the campaigners have been going on about for decades? No of course it wasn't, it was decided on behind closed doors.
In the event of Brexit, who will be accountable for the size and shape of the wall, and of all the other changes that will be imposed on us? Who will decide the precise details of the negotiations between our Plucky Island and the EU, between the Jolly Good Chaps and the US government/Wall St (is there an acronym for TTIP targetted specifically at us?) and what the poxy City can and can't do? I'll tell you- the Tory government between now and 2020, unfettered so long as their majority holds. Any new incoming government in 2020 will have to renegotiate anything they don't like. That isn't democratic accountability, it's a blank piece of paper for a redesign of what it means to be British.[/QUOT
Aye, your right pigpyet has smoothly avoided all that, but his claim to have renegotiated our position within the EU is an outright lie,as even any casual reading of the realities will show.
Why doesn't anyone with more than a single neurone take Corbyn seriously? Because he is a dithering clown. He fears assination so much that he is not even attempting to stamp his will on the party.
How could anyone take a man seriously, who advocates spending billions to keep a few shipbuilders employed, by building the next generation of Trident, but with no nukes. What will his next wheeze be? Manufacturing rifles with a solid barrel. It employs rifle makers without having to fire nasty bullets.
We have aircraft carriers without any plane to take off from them ffs.Why doesn't anyone with more than a single neurone take Corbyn seriously? Because he is a dithering clown. He fears assination so much that he is not even attempting to stamp his will on the party.
How could anyone take a man seriously, who advocates spending billions to keep a few shipbuilders employed, by building the next generation of Trident, but with no nukes. What will his next wheeze be? Manufacturing rifles with a solid barrel. It employs rifle makers without having to fire nasty bullets.
In fairness, Boris the arsehole is preferable to Trump by a huge margin, now if Boris was to start talking about building a wall between the North and the South and expecting the North to pay for it?It would seem that is what British politics has descended to, almost as bad as in the USA
But BAE needs to keep its shareholders happy, do keep upWe have aircraft carriers without any plane to take off from them ffs.
We have aircraft carriers without any plane to take off from them ffs.
Can't Ocean only use helicopters since the Harriers were decommissioned?aits also remarkably ignorant - we do have an aircraft carrier, and have had from long before the Invincible class carriers were sold to Gillette: its HMS Ocean, she weighs 22,000 tons and her aircraft played a significant role in the Libya operation. you'd assume that those who make out that they are reasonably well informed Defence watchers would have noticed a war and a 22,000 ton ship that looks like an aircraft carrier...
There has been talk the vote leave,supported by the Tory cabinet members is about leveraging a better deal for associate membership rather than leaving, Boris column Boris Johnson exclusive: There is only one way to get the change we want - vote to leave the EU does nothing to dispell that view, associate membership for UK is part of the five presidents plan . Grassroots out supported by backbenchers actually wants out. Electoral Commission decides which gets the gig in 6weeks.In that case, it's fucked. Can't see that campaign being dominated by anyone other than UKIP and the eurosceptic wing of the Tory party.
Not exactly a piercing analysis but should be enough to get you into UKIP.I'm gonna vote to leave, fuck europe.
Ocean's a helicopter platform. It was never an aircraft carrier in the meaningful sense - it could transport Harrier but they couldn't take off from it in any useful capacity.Can't Ocean only use helicopters since the Harriers were decommissioned?
What do you mean he's not to be trusted? He is a politician. None of them can be trusted.
Either that or anyone arguing for a leave vote is a ideologue, and of course those are bad.Christ, fucking liberals already trying to turn this whole debate into 'if you want out, then look at the people you're siding with'. Well, all the financial institutions want to stay in, so where does that leave you? Is this really your political analysis?
I'm rather suspicious of anyone with a firm view, either way. That suggests that they haven't thought this through.Either that or anyone arguing for a leave vote is a ideologue, and of course those are bad.
I'm rather suspicious of anyone with a firm view, either way. That suggests that they haven't thought this through.
I wonder why they thought letting Galloway join the leave campaign was a good idea?
I wonder why they thought letting Galloway join the leave campaign was a good idea?
Who is they though?I wonder why they thought letting Galloway join the leave campaign was a good idea?
I'm not sure. I guess someone must have put together the speakers at that 'grassroots' leave thing though - so them.Who is they though?