littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
18?How old was he then, exactly?
*taps watch*
US equivalent of a hang mandela t-shirt. Sign of a cunt at a young age, and given that he's gone on to become a conservative judge, still a cunt.
18?How old was he then, exactly?
*taps watch*
I don't get it though: Why would she (or anyone) nuke Tehran? It is not a joke. It is so not a joke.Your missing the point, HC would have at least observed the diplomatic niceties, giving us time to lay in bottled water, dry goods etc,afore nuking Tehran.
I honestly wake up each morning wondering if this stupid bastard hasnt actually provoked a major conflict.
Founding a fascism forever society not like wandering down Carnaby Street and spending a few quid on a fascist t-shirt, it's a bit more than that surely.18?
US equivalent of a hang mandela t-shirt. Sign of a cunt at a young age, and given that he's gone on to become a conservative judge, still a cunt.
....same age as me when I was chucking bricks at the NFHow old was he then, exactly?
*taps watch*
Old enough to know fucking better, and looking at his life since?nothing seems to have changed.How old was he then, exactly?
*taps watch*
No, your right, it was a joke, now it's a definite possibility.I don't get it though: Why would she (or anyone) nuke Tehran? It is not a joke. It is so not a joke.
I had a mate who flirted with the NF around that age. Went on to be actively anti-fash. My mate had a fucked up, abusive childhood and was angry at everything because of it.Old enough to know fucking better, and looking at his life since?nothing seems to have changed.
Fair does then, but JFC everyone has to grow up. *spitballs*....same age as me when I was chucking bricks at the NF
Inbred sense of entitlement.I had a mate who flirted with the NF around that age. Went on to be actively anti-fash. My mate had a fucked up, abusive childhood and was angry at everything because of it.
What's this cunt's excuse?
Tell that to the psychotic egomaniac currently inhabiting the WH, the same WH that is rapidly descending into the SH!Fair does then, but JFC everyone has to grow up. *spitballs*
Prep school means roughly the same as "Public School" here. The year book says he was the "founder" of this club, and was in it Freshman, Sophomore, Junior and Senior years (that's the 1, 2, 3, 4 part). He was class of 1985, born in August 1967, so he would have been 13 when he founded it and still involved when he graduated at 17 coming up to 18.How old was he then, exactly?
*taps watch*
Same age as me, when I was having bricks chucked at me....same age as me when I was chucking bricks at the NF
Long dead. He was sound, but never did get effective support.lbj, your childhood mate sounds a good ally. Hope he's getting some effective support.
Your missing the point, HC would have at least observed the diplomatic niceties, giving us time to lay in bottled water, dry goods etc,afore nuking Tehran.
I honestly wake up each morning wondering if this stupid bastard hasnt actually provoked a major conflict.
Sorry.Long dead. He was sound, but never did get effective support.
Can you expand on that? I'm knackered, it's been a long day.In turn, I worry that your use of the word "provoked" here might reflect undue optimism about his intentions. Today, it seems a lot more like he intends to provoke a major conflict in the way Mark Chapman provoked John Lennon's death.
No worries. He died 17 years ago. Good to think of him again, tbh.Sorry.
Can you expand on that? I'm knackered, it's been a long day.
A happy couple there.
Reminds me of how the Scientologists, way back in the 1990s, tried to characterise anyone who quoted their lunatic scriptures as a "copyright terrorist"In Trumps America it can, though no doubt some efforts will be made to identify 'Mexican terrorists'
Reminds me of how the Scientologists, way back in the 1990s, tried to characterise anyone who quoted their lunatic scriptures as a "copyright terrorist"
There's something for the "positives about Trump" thread...he's not a Scieno.
This is a proposed state law, Republicans.
Bill would make it illegal to ID officers who shoot citizens
The state NAACP and the Virginia Press Association criticized the proposal, which comes following a series of police shootings nationally that were captured on bystanders’ cellphone video, such as the fatal shooting in 2015 of Walter Scott in North Charleston, South Carolina. Officer Michael Slager shot him in the back as he ran. Police in the United States killed 1,092 people in 2016, according to a database from The Guardian newspaper.
Little to no information is publicly available in Virginia about the officer after a police shooting. Any history of disciplinary problems, previous shootings or use of force complaints is shielded from the public in Virginia law.
“Anything that broadens the gap between the community trust and law enforcement, that would deepen the divide, cannot be a good thing,” said Linda Thomas, president of The Virginia State Conference NAACP. “And so we would urge lawmakers to ... vote this down, and continue on the pathway that leads to better communication, citizens’ review and oversight in the investigatory process, and to continue to remedy anything that would prevent law enforcement officers from being in tune and in touch with the community.”
She also noted that after a police officer shoots someone the person shot is named and opened up to public scrutiny, “while cloaking in secrecy the identity of the public servant who is paid with taxpayer money.”
It would be almost reassuring to think this was the worst we had to worry about.Reminds me of how the Scientologists, way back in the 1990s, tried to characterise anyone who quoted their lunatic scriptures as a "copyright terrorist"
There's something for the "positives about Trump" thread...he's not a Scieno.
Expect more bills like this in the coming weeks, just fining or imprisioning protesters wont satisfy the demands of the Loons supporters.
I dislike hyperbole, but if just a small fraction of whats surfacing in the last few days becomes enacted in law many Americans will start to view the PRC as a bastion of democracy.
Mmm, but how many of his appointees believe in the 'rapture? ' Bannon, at least, has got to be in the frameReminds me of how the Scientologists, way back in the 1990s, tried to characterise anyone who quoted their lunatic scriptures as a "copyright terrorist"
There's something for the "positives about Trump" thread...he's not a Scieno.
See, editIt would be almost reassuring to think this was the worst we had to worry about.
Eh, but there's more, and worse.