Boris Sprinkler
Dont be scared
This paper highlights different approaches to identifying and recognizing the colonialist narratives in a Eurocentric take on history. From Key stage two onwards.
You were probably right, but I don't think it's fair to use their skin colour as the key factor here. I'm assuming you are white. Did you tell the organisers?
contextualised it's not a problem , where it;s used to cast doubt on honesty, integrity or commitment to a locality it becomes a problem ...Obv half caste has dodgy history, but “half x” or “quarter y” (however people want to slice it up by parentage / grandparentage) doesn’t seem problematic to me.
at the very least acknowledgement that ' the victors write the history' and that even well post WW2 the 'offiical' history of many things was written solely from the Western perspectiveWhat does "decolonising" the curriculum entail?
In my kids’ school a large part of it was making sure there were a load of books (fiction and non fiction) featuring Black people and other PoC, and offering teaching on Black history all year round. They’ve got a high proportion of Spanish and Portuguese speaking staff, regularly translate letters into multiple languages, and changed their taught language to Portuguese with a deal with the Portuguese embassy (who teach advanced skills to the kids who already speak it). I suspect there’s also been staff teaching on how neurodivergence in Children of Colour is frequently missed (it’s also got a good reputation for SEN Inclusivity).Decolonising challenges ideas and ways of working that are established through colonial philosophies and practices. It can be about the way education is organised as well as style and content of teaching. Perhaps the session could be used to explore or reimagine what that looks like.
Decolonising the curriculum is not really about changing the source materials as such, it considers what counts as good teaching (materials, delivery, assessment) and why.
There is always something that can be done.
Of course, crappy implementation of policy is a great way to kill challenging initiatives.
I agree, but often criticism based on methodology is simply a way of avoiding the findings. The kind of data you describe is very difficult to get and is often expected to meet higher standards of 'evidence' than the things we know or care less about (for example, medical research relating to women's health is woeful).I definitely agree you'd want to know the provenance of any guidance including what kind of research had been done, involving how many, in which geographical areas and which classes had been sampled for their views together with an indication of what %age of the population that was etc etc.
This is a very technical term referring to the way groups of people are treated institutionally. Hopefully not used too much where the topic of conversation is informal.Some one I know - who is a proper academic prof - uses the term 'people racialised as black'
This is a crucial point in decolonising, the idea that black and brown people have more in common with each other than with white folk is baked in our social norms. There's little space for the idea that class, age, urban/rural living, religious or other factors might be more important groupings, partly because the lived experience of black and brown people is generally worse than their white counterparts in each category. Of course this is true in colonising countries but it is also true in colonised societies.I think some policy-makers blithely assume there's one cohesive and united [people who are not white] community,
The people I was with last night would question the fundamental understanding of neurotypical and divergent thinking and behaviours which are essentially based on Western (white) approaches.I suspect there’s also been staff teaching on how neurodivergence in Children of Colour is frequently missed (it’s also got a good reputation for SEN Inclusivity).
Interesting… my own thinking on this could go two different ways based on the exact context but don’t want to risk detailing the thread away from race to neurodiversity. If I remember I may talk to you about this in the pub at somepoint.The people I was with last night would question the fundamental understanding of neurotypical and divergent thinking and behaviours which are essentially based on Western (white) approaches.
I remember that being used a bunch back in the 80s.Still hear (albeit rarely) the occasional person use the term "half caste".
So black people/ POC should do all the work around this? Teach the white people?We had a CPD session on 'decolonising the curriculum' a couple of weeks ago. It was done by two white people. I gave it a miss.
So black people/ POC should do all the work around this? Teach the white people?
You're a what now?!?I'm a Beaker Person.
I'm in my 60s, so how come the people of my generation I know are aware that it is fine to refer to people as Black, but she did not?She's in her 60's so probably remembers 'coloured' being widely used but also there have been multiple decades since where it hasn't been.
She didn't have a bad word to say about anyone and only wanted to get things right, but you'd think it would have occurred to her to check before now. I probably should have explained that it's also fine not to comment on a person's skin colour at all, but that might have been too big of a leap for one day.
The yanks do love policing language even when it’s daft.The reaction in the US to a South African singer identifying as coloured.
Tyla’s racial identity: South African singer sparks culture war
The term "coloured" is a slur in the US, but for millions of South Africans it is part of their identity.www.bbc.co.uk
The yanks do love policing language even when it’s daft.
also the whole 'BAME' labels us wrong seems to often come from either 'Robinsons and Coopers' South Asians or Trevor 'tread on my neck harder B'wana' Philips assimilationist black folx, which means the nuanced discussions aobut it get lost<snip>
This is a crucial point in decolonising, the idea that black and brown people have more in common with each other than with white folk is baked in our social norms. There's little space for the idea that class, age, urban/rural living, religious or other factors might be more important groupings, partly because the lived experience of black and brown people is generally worse than their white counterparts in each category. Of course this is true in colonising countries but it is also true in colonised societies.
In the UK this 'othering' might mean that a brown person is routinely offered unnecessary translation services to access public services and a white person who needs them is not... because the probability that people 'like them' need the service is high/not high.
So black people/ POC should do all the work around this? Teach the white people?
If 'Coloured' is regarded as offensive in the US, why hasn't the NAACP changed its name?
Maybe, but you should see the reaction from some here when a word is spelled in the American variant style.The yanks do love policing language even when it’s daft.
tbf certain Americans can't quite grasp the concept that black people can come from other places other than America e.g. Idris Elba isn't an African American from England he's just British or Black British.The yanks do love policing language even when it’s daft.