Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The big Brexit thread - news, updates and discussion

UKIP getting a million votes in the EU election was a big driver.
Indeed, and Pickman's proposed solution, which would have made it easy for Cameron to come back with crumbs and claim they constituted "reform" would have been about as good as not bothering with a referendum at all, for those voters.
 
Indeed, and Pickman's proposed solution, which would have made it easy for Cameron to come back with crumbs and claim they constituted "reform" would have been about as good as not bothering with a referendum at all, for those voters.
The whole question amounted to the preferred veneer of 'democracy' stuck on the neoliberal, consolidator state. You can argue the strategy all you want, but the 'rules of the game' remain constant.
 
Indeed, and Pickman's proposed solution, which would have made it easy for Cameron to come back with crumbs and claim they constituted "reform" would have been about as good as not bothering with a referendum at all, for those voters.
if you recall he did come back with crumbs and claim they constituted reform.
 
If you're going to propose this as an alternative "thing what Cameron should of done" why not propose just not bothering having a referendum at all?
I like 'what ifs' . What do you think would have happened if Cameron hadn't promised a referendum
 
I like 'what ifs' . What do you think would have happened if Cameron hadn't promised a referendum
I don't know. Unlike pickman's model I don't claim to be some kind of political mastermind who is way better at knowing what to do than a multitude of prime ministers. But I don't think it would have led to a worse outcome than pickman's model's rubbish suggestion.
 
I don't know. Unlike pickman's model I don't claim to be some kind of political mastermind who is way better at knowing what to do than a multitude of prime ministers. But I don't think it would have led to a worse outcome than pickman's model's rubbish suggestion.
i don't claim to be some sort of political mastermind.

tbf you don't need to be some sort of political mastermind to know better what to do than a multitude of prime ministers.
 
Indeed, and Pickman's proposed solution, which would have made it easy for Cameron to come back with crumbs and claim they constituted "reform" would have been about as good as not bothering with a referendum at all, for those voters.
I'm not sure about that. The EU leaders totally cunted off Cameron at the time.

A bit of respect (to the UK) and some reasonable concessions at that time would have diffused a lot of the built up resentments.
 
I'm not sure about that. The EU leaders totally cunted off Cameron at the time.

A bit of respect (to the UK) and some reasonable concessions at that time would have diffused a lot of the built up resentments.
Nah, the EU, as an institution is in a better position post-Brexit than it would have been if it had offered Cameron the sorts of concessions it would have taken. By now, half a dozen countries would have pulled the same stunt, and the EU would have ended up a husk.
 
I'm not sure about that. The EU leaders totally cunted off Cameron at the time.

A bit of respect (to the UK) and some reasonable concessions at that time would have diffused a lot of the built up resentments.
they cunted cameron off because he turned up without anything to back him up

theodore roosevelt, the american president, famously said 'speak softly and carry a big stick'

cameron had at most a twig and so no one heard his soft speaking

if he'd done the obvious thing, had a referendum and then gone he'd have outmanoeuvred farage as there'd have been the referendum (do you want to remain in an unreformed eu), he'd have a big mandate to wave in front of the french and germans, and it wouldn't have looked like the british had sent baldrick.

in addition, by having a referendum before asking if he could have some concessions cameron would have made it more difficult, not less, for other countries to get the same because referenda are a fucking headache.
 
I'm not sure about that. The EU leaders totally cunted off Cameron at the time.

A bit of respect (to the UK) and some reasonable concessions at that time would have diffused a lot of the built up resentments.

TBF I am not sure they could have - after all, almost all the issues on the doorstep were more down to the actions of the UK Government rather than the EU.
 
TBF I am not sure they could have - after all, almost all the issues on the doorstep were more down to the actions of the UK Government rather than the EU.
yeh but what always happens in those circumstances is the leader looks for a foreign policy success. obvs ideally a war. but in the absence of a handy war he could win, cameron might have thought he'd outfox those wily eu leaders. and as so often in his administration he showed himself totally unsuited to the challenge
 
yeh but what always happens in those circumstances is the leader looks for a foreign policy success. obvs ideally a war. but in the absence of a handy war he could win, cameron might have thought he'd outfox those wily eu leaders. and as so often in his administration he showed himself totally unsuited to the challenge

indeed - even if he had forced and won concessions he'd have then faced the insurmountable political difficulties of someone saying that he'd done what he promised, to bring home the bacon.
 
Nah, the EU, as an institution is in a better position post-Brexit than it would have been if it had offered Cameron the sorts of concessions it would have taken. By now, half a dozen countries would have pulled the same stunt, and the EU would have ended up a husk.

What sort of concessions were you thinking of?
 
What sort of concessions were you thinking of?
Well, what was offered and was apparently derisory what the "handbrake", the ability to have temporary suspensions to free movement of people. Acceptable would have presumably been something that effectively ended it permanently.
 
Back
Top Bottom