Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Ashes 2010/11

The signs were there. But you can't just say, "taking out those who did well, the team did poorly". That's something of a tautology.
 
Indeed, and that really is with the benefit of hindsight. I didn't expect Ponting and Clarke to flop as they did. Hell, I even expected something from North. First innings at Adelaide was the first time I thought 'hang on..'.

The sign from Brisbane's second innings was actually that Ponting was in good touch...
 
The signs were there. But you can't just say, "taking out those who did well, the team did poorly". That's something of a tautology.

Collapses before and after that one partnership. It was a fairly obvious bright side at the time. Not hindsight.
 
Collapses before and after that one partnership. It was a fairly obvious bright side at the time. Not hindsight.

And then safely seeing out the last three hours of the match in the second innings.

Did you post as much on here? Cos I wasn't thinking like that at the time. Rather the opposite, in fact: the batsman under most pressure found form, which was quite worrying really.
 
10 reasons Poms WON'T win


1 Overrated
They walked around The Oval after their dominant home summer like they were God's gifts to Wisden. Here's who they really beat. No one. Nuffies and cheats. England clean-swept the worst team on the planet, Bangladesh, and then won three out of four Tests against rotten Pakistan. Now they're portrayed as superstars.

2 Kevin Pietersen
He might be growing a moustache for a very good cause but he's still getting around looking like Dirk Diggler out of Boogie Nights. His most recent Test efforts have been the biggest joke. John Buchanan was right with his assessment of Pietersen. Buchanan was panned because the truth hurt. There's more than one 'I' in Kevin Pietersen and it hurts morale.

3 No top speedster
Jimmy Anderson, Stuart Broad and Steve Finn are respectable quicks. But they lack the fear factor. Every truly great attack has someone pushing 150km/h, like Mitchell Johnson does for Australia. None of the touring fast bowlers are frightening. Away from swing and seam-friendly England, that doesn't leave them with much.

4 Passive captain
Andrew Strauss has to lead by example because his introverted demeanour doesn't get the blood pumping too much. Only his scores do. He leads with quiet assurance when things are going well. But he comes across as introverted and submissive when things start going pear-shaped.

5 No superstars
Pietersen is as good as anyone when he's in the mood, but he hasn't been in the mood for a long time. He couldn't make a hundred against Bangladesh - his 99 was close but no cigar - and Doug Bollinger, Ben Hilfenhaus and Johnson can smell blood. Graeme Swann is the only Englishman to make a world XI right now.England are successful because they know their limitations. Which means there are limitations.

6 Over-analysis
They've faced bowling machines with footage of Australian speedsters running in at them - and still didn't want to know about Mitchell Johnson. They've given themselves three weeks in Australia to acclimatise but haven't played on pitches like the monster they'll encounter at the Gabba. Every breath they take is a part of a suffocating plan. There's no freedom, nothing instinctive or adventurous. Paralysis by over-analysis.

7 No depth
In such a cramped schedule, injuries are bound to hit both camps. England are in serious strife if they lose any of their first XI. There's a vast gulf between their top-tier players and those on the standby list. Australia can only hope and pray that off-spinner Monty Panesar is called in for Graeme Swann. Australia have eight Test-standard speedsters in the queue.

8 Chokers
This is England we're talking about. Losing is a tradition. Think soccer World Cups. Think Tim Henman at Wimbledon. Think every cricket tour of Australia since 1986-87. They always arrive talking themselves up, vowing they won't wilt under the heat and pressure and scrutiny, then wilt under the heat and pressure and scrutiny. They've hired a self-described Yips Doctor - because they need one.

9 Warm-ups
Everyone keeps rattling on about England's perfect preparation. They must be having a laugh. A few of them made runs at Adelaide Oval. It's like batting on the Hume Highway. Anyone seen the scorecards? Western Australia rolled England for 223. South Australia dismissed them for 288 on the Hume. And Australia A ripped through their top order in Hobart A yesterday. Perfectly prepared? Piffle.

10 Scars
Five of their top six batsmen are the same lot who stumbled and bumbled through the 5-0 loss on England's last trip to Australia. The scarring is deep and real. Jimmy Anderson's memories of Australia are all nightmarish. He averaged 45.16. Broad and Finn are yet to play a Test series in Australia. Hard surfaces jarring bones and muscles, oppressive heat - they won't know what or who has hit them.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...hy-poms-wont-win/story-e6frey50-1225955985591

brilliant
 
And then safely seeing out the last three hours of the match in the second innings.

Did you post as much on here? Cos I wasn't thinking like that at the time. Rather the opposite, in fact: the batsman under most pressure found form, which was quite worrying really.

no idea what I posted tbh nut I know what I was thinking at the time
 
Thoughtful analysis by Simon Hughes in the Telegraph. Basically England have won due to being better at batting and bowling than Australia.
 
quality. here we go... come on jimmy, let's av it!

jimmy's one of my favourite players, i'm glad he's shown he can do the business in oz after all the doubt over his ability with the kookaburra. makes warne's claim that swanny would have to take 25 for eng to take the ashes look bit stupid. how many things has warne done recently that make him look a dick? quick top 3s, anyone?

1 twitter twattery
2 his tv show (r.i.p)
3 maccy d ads.

fuck, i need to do a top ten!
 
Back
Top Bottom