Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Ashes 2009

Looking at the wicket/no-ball again, it seems his whole body/back leg is in the way of seeing his front foot. Really need the 3rd umpire checking out that front foot or something.
 
The thing which sums up Bell to me is his highest score of 199. He has the skill to be a great batsman, but somehow it never quite happens. Now someone with the technique of Bell and the grit of Collingwood, what a cricketer he would be.
 
Well, it is one of the traditional types for England batsmen of recent years. There's either the grafter, who scores much-needed but ugly runs, or there's the aesthete, who has all the strokes but never quite seems to put in the performances their technique promises.

Admitt it you are talking about David Gower..
 
They're at a poor angle, and are expected to make decisions at the other end first and foremost.
Not true. They are expected first, in terms of time, to determine whether or not the ball is legal. If it is not legal, what happens at the other end is not all that relevant. And they aren't at such a poor angle – they are almost stood right over the crease. A lapse in concentration is the only excuse for me, and an umpire making a mistake with this for more than one ball a day needs to be taken to the nets for remedial work.
 
He was better than that at his best. Anyway, I'm too young to remember Gower as a player.
Difference between Gower and Bell is that Gower didn't get out because of pressure. He'd get out to an airy waft more or less at random, whether playing well or badly, pressure or no pressure, but he did make runs when it counted too. Gower in full flow was a joy to watch – he made it look entirely effortless.
 
Does anyone know offhand what the rules are regarding Watson batting if he's off the field for any length of time?
 
Back
Top Bottom