Yep. Pietersen should bat at three, and it could do him some good. He's a poor starter (as is Ponting, mind you), but once in, he should be given as much responsibility as possible. With a good player at three, you can afford the luxury of playing your star player at four (India's fortunate position). Otherwise, if 3 is a problem position, your star player should step up imo.Pietersen. He should have moved up to 3 yonks ago.
Exactly -- neither of them fit at no. 3. And I don't think that Pieterson does either, because he is too flaky to fulfil the role that a no. 3 sometimes needs to do of just carrying an innings.
I'm genuinely baffled.
You jinxed him there.Anyway, in other news, Bell is now 4% of the way to his inevitable double century.
It's just a cunning ploy to lull the Convicts into a false sense of security.
Only problem being Rob Key is utter shit and is only mentioned because of a derth of batting talent right now.
Not just that. Half county cricketers, and especially batsmen, are South Africans on Kolpak contracts.I'm sure there is talent out there, they just don't get a chance cause england never want to drop anyone.
Not just that. Half county cricketers, and especially batsmen, are South Africans on Kolpak contracts.
Paradoxically, the extra money now in the county game is killing it.
One at a time, but as many as you like over the season, I believe.Whats the foreigners in the county game rule like now? forgot how many each county gets..
Not a word here I disagree with. I think I said in 2005 that he should be dropped, and I haven't seen anything since to make me revise my opinion.Ian Bell is awful! I dont care if he score a ton in the second innings he should never get back in the England set up ever agian. He was dropped for a reason and should have stayed dropped. He is a bottler of the highest order. His technique is great and he can score runs for fun in the County championship, but when it matters at international level he will always be found wanting because he bats like a scared little boy against the best teams!
Did i mention i hate Ian Bell?
One at a time, but as many as you like over the season, I believe.
That's not the problem. The problem is South Africans with a British grandparent getting in on European employment law. These are players who aren't good enough to make the international set-up, but who want to make a living playing cricket – the South African domestic game isn't fully professional – so they come here. Teams in search of short-term success pack their teams with these 'Kolpak' players, many of them experienced, solid players. It's cheaper and less risky than developing your own talent, but it means that young English players have few first-team opportunities.
One at a time, but as many as you like over the season, I believe.
That's not the problem. The problem is South Africans with a British grandparent getting in on European employment law. These are players who aren't good enough to make the international set-up, but who want to make a living playing cricket – the South African domestic game isn't fully professional – so they come here. Teams in search of short-term success pack their teams with these 'Kolpak' players, many of them experienced, solid players. It's cheaper and less risky than developing your own talent, but it means that young English players have few first-team opportunities.
Two or three utter stars, like it used to be, who the youngsters can learn from and be inspired by, is one thing. Half a dozen cynical old pros blocking youngsters and providing very little in the way of inspiration is quite another.
Not a word here I disagree with. I think I said in 2005 that he should be dropped, and I haven't seen anything since to make me revise my opinion.
Yep, just as the Sun comes out.Still, at lest we get a bowl at them today.
Still, at lest we get a bowl at them today.