I remember one match years ago when the ball actually managed to land in someone's pint.lol@ beer getting on the ball, that'll probs stink now
I remember one match years ago when the ball actually managed to land in someone's pint.
Was plumb too.lbw appeal not given, phew
Yep. Going back to a subject which came up at Lord's, that was a shocker.that was plum, unlucky aussies.
Was plumb too.
Mostly to Mitchell Johnson.shit happens
Not over yet.So, what's the verdict? A good day at the office all told?
Do you think Rudi's looking forward to his next gig at the Gabba?
Because a test match is not limited overs Cricket. It's time. After all, it's possible for the match to be more than 450 overs if they have the time.Pissing it down in Burton on Trent, if it's owt like that in Brum, no more play today and we are headed for a draw.
Why can't they say
"a test match is XXX overs" and play on Tuesday and even Wednesday if needs be.
Obviously there would have to be a cut off somewhere, but far more chance of getting 5 fine days from 7
Because a test match is not limited overs Cricket. It's time.
Why? There have been countless rain-affected draws in test matches; it's just part of the game. Why must we be endlessly pursuing wins for one side or the other? Everyone knows that if they don't bowl the opposition out in five days, they won't win; why tinker with it? Anyway, such an arrangement would probably encourage even slower over rates.But it isn't time if it's pissing it down with rain.
If the remaining two games are rain affected draws, surely they will have to reconsider this?