Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Ashes 2009

The thing that KP could have done that no one else would do was to completely dismantle a bowling line up, or bat a particular bowler out of the game. Psychologically that was more important than how many runs he'd score. Bell (or Key or Shah for that matter) isn't going to do that, even if he makes 3 centuries between now and the last Test. Fortunately for England, the Aussie attack is no better than a moderately good international side at the moment, so an in-form Bell should be able to step up.
 
This series KP hasn't been mobile in the field or between the wickets and was averaging about 35, so it shouldn't be too much for Bell to match and improve on this (on current performance) and god forbid strengthen the side, assuming he makes some runs? The KP averaging 50 against the Aussies as he did before the series is more of a loss. Bell may even allow Bopara to drop down one and relax.

Pluses for Broad were his catch, getting Ponting, almost Clarke first ball, and amazingly being our most economical bowler, so with the loss of KP I'd keep him in as well (depending on other stuff of course)
 
Broad doesn't appear to be getting much consistent movement off the seam. I think this is leading him to bowl a hundred variations. He's out of rythym and confidence. The bowling coach just needs to get him in the nets bowling a consistent line and length and go through the bowling plan against each batsman.
 
Sledging is only effective when you're good, though. What do you say to a batsman who's just smacked a long-hop from your main strike bowler for four?

I think last Ashes I mentioned my sure-fire plan for victory, which is to bring in Derren Brown as the short-leg specialist. It cannot fail, why has he not been called up?
 
Has anyone mentioned Ramprakash coming in to the team yet??? What a fairy tale that would be.
I think I would have picked him a couple of years ago. It would be similar in a way to Simon Katich for Australia – dropped after some poor results, but then going away to the 1st class game and scoring massive runs. Katich was a success on his return, and I think Ramprakash could have been too.

Maybe too late now though.
 
I think I would have picked him a couple of years ago. It would be similar in a way to Simon Katich for Australia – dropped after some poor results, but then going away to the 1st class game and scoring massive runs. Katich was a success on his return, and I think Ramprakash could have been too.

Maybe too late now though.
A couple of commentators picked up on the fact that it took him an age to score his 100th century, having knocked out the previous dozen more or less weekly, leading to speculation that he was still very sensitive to pressure.
 
A couple of commentators picked up on the fact that it took him an age to score his 100th century, having knocked out the previous dozen more or less weekly, leading to speculation that he was still very sensitive to pressure.
Don't think it was quite an 'age'. A couple of months iirc.
 
Australia struggling against Northants at the moment. Hughes out for 10.

It's just terrible what a bad time he is having this tour :D

A couple of commentators picked up on the fact that it took him an age to score his 100th century, having knocked out the previous dozen more or less weekly, leading to speculation that he was still very sensitive to pressure.

It seems that the ability to handle pressure is more important than talent.
 
Conversely - there must be some above average players out there who have never really shined, but have the perfect temprament for test matches.
 
Didn't he win player of the tournament in the first IPL? Maybe wrong player..

Still - he's pretty handy.
Don't know, but Brendan McCullum of New Zealand had a blinder in the IPL and is also a very ordinary test player. 20/20 success ≠ good test player.
 
Back
Top Bottom