Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Ashes 2009

Bopara should stay at 3 or 4

A lineup of Strauss, Cook, Bell and Collingwood at the top looks a bit too polite for my liking.
 
Losing Pieterson isn't a blow. He's not performed, and has actively gone after personal glory rather than team success.
 
Losing Pieterson isn't a blow. He's not performed, and has actively gone after personal glory rather than team success.

Of course it's a blow. His dismissal on the sweep was awful, it was clear he needed a talking to, but he was spoken to and would have shaped up throughout the series. It's a blow because it does mean Bell, who plays lovely shots but gets spooked, and because Bopara is too high at three, especially now, given what comes after him.

We'll still win the series 2-0 though :cool:
 
Indeed....that's what is so maddening about Bell he's got the technique he just seems to lose his head too much.
 
This is why he should stay where he is at five. Like Graham Thorpe, before him, and Steve Waugh for Australia, you need a fighter at five, someone who'll dig in when the top order makes a mess of it. Collingwood's the only England batsman who can fill this role.

ETA: Also, he's doing well at 5. Leave him where he's doing well.

Correct. Whenever we need someone to get us out of jail, Collingwood steps up. And him and Prior together can be a real headache for the bowling side.

Losing Pietersen is not the end of the world IMO, we clearly can't rely on him to make runs on a regular basis, he's been little more than dead weight in the series so far, although his injury probably had a lot to do with that. Bell is probably itching to prove himself after a lengthy drop, and for all his faults is still a terrific player. Bopara is capable of shaping up to KP's role if he gets his head right, and I think moving to 4 would be good for him.

If we lose Jimmy or Collingwood, we're fucked. Anyone else and we can plug the gaps and keep going.
 
Hmm. Bell did make a 50 in four of the 2006-07 Ashes Tests. That's against Warne and McGrath in Australian conditions too.
 
I will speak to Pietersen about his slack ways.
He rents the office above me and employs what seems to be all ladies, all aged between 20-30 and all are not unattractive.
Generally you can tell when he is about as the combined value of all the cars parked in the car park trebles.
 
I will speak to Pietersen about his slack ways.
He rents the office above me and employs what seems to be all ladies, all aged between 20-30 and all are not unattractive.
Generally you can tell when he is about as the combined value of all the cars parked in the car park trebles.

What does a cricketer need an office for? His office should be the crease goddammit :hmm:
 
I got a feeling Pietersen won't play in all the tests.

As I said on 26 June.

Even if none of my other predictions come true...

It makes you wonder why they even bothered playing him in the 20/20 World Cup. I guess he was probably going to be injured anyway though.

Perhaps Andy Flower could have a gentle word with Trescothick and ask him to play the last few tests as a kind of send off??? Haha, if only.

Looks like Bellend is the man. I think he'll do ok, but who else is there other than Shah??? Bring back Gower!!!
 
We need some Grievous Bodily Harmison!

0,5001,5310311,00.jpg


:cool::cool::cool:
 
Of course it's a blow. His dismissal on the sweep was awful, it was clear he needed a talking to, but he was spoken to and would have shaped up throughout the series. It's a blow because it does mean Bell, who plays lovely shots but gets spooked, and because Bopara is too high at three, especially now, given what comes after him.

This...
 
Agree with DM too...

During (yet) another session of work based cricket punitry the names Trescothick, Bell, Shah, Bopara and Key were mentioned and inserted at different places in 'our' England xi's. As were the names Onions, Harmison, Broad, Rashid, Panasar and (leftfield I know) Plunkett.

None of the combinations looked quite right. Certainly not many of the names above will have the convicts shaking in their boots.

A barely fit Fred and no Pietersen is a huge blow make no mistake.
 
Flintoff was in Bristol doing some school work yesterday - the headline on the local papers newstands was Flintoff over Bristol - not sure if that was a deliberate nod to Hitler or an allusion to Flintioff's right wing views....
 
Agree with DM too...

During (yet) another session of work based cricket punitry the names Trescothick, Bell, Shah, Bopara and Key were mentioned and inserted at different places in 'our' England xi's. As were the names Onions, Harmison, Broad, Rashid, Panasar and (leftfield I know) Plunkett.

None of the combinations looked quite right. Certainly not many of the names above will have the convicts shaking in their boots.

A barely fit Fred and no Pietersen is a huge blow make no mistake.
I honestly don't think Pietersen makes that much material difference to the team. He has had 4 chances and hasn't impressed on any of them.
 
Well, thinking on this a bit more, I reckon Bell might do a lot better this time. Australia have been told to rein in their sledging and as a whole they appear to be far less intimidating side at the crease.

Also, after Warne's revelations regarding Bell's dismissal in the last series at Lords, hopefully Bell will grow in confidence and be less prone to being undermined from a mental perspective.
 
Well, thinking on this a bit more, I reckon Bell might do a lot better this time. Australia have been told to rein in their sledging and as a whole they appear to be far less intimidating side at the crease.
Sledging is only effective when you're good, though. What do you say to a batsman who's just smacked a long-hop from your main strike bowler for four?
 
Latest re. the Aussies' game at Northampton is that Shane Watson and Stuart Clark have got a game, but Lee is still injured.
 
The psychological factor is massive in test match cricket. Flintoff seems about the only bowler we have who can make the batsmen try and play the player rather than playing the ball. Warne was the best at it. You need to have the confidence to look the batsmen in the eye. And you don't always have to trying to aggressively psyche them out. Flintoff is good at getting the batsmen off balance by a wink and a joke. He's not doing it to be friendly - he's doing it to create a connection, and therefore a distraction, between him and the batsmen. They are thinking about something other than the ball.

Anderson isn't really able to do it. He can stare them down a bit - but he's in his own rythym that he doesn't want to break.
 
Back
Top Bottom