Plenty of people with far more knowledge than you were saying other things. How did you choose?No, it’s because people with far more knowledge than me about this were saying it.
Plenty of people with far more knowledge than you were saying other things. How did you choose?No, it’s because people with far more knowledge than me about this were saying it.
I don't remember any serious scientists calling for a full lockdown in October and most sources have been downplaying the possible consequences of mutation in this virus. On the whole coronaviruses mutate much less readily than flu viruses for instance (which are capable of merging with other flu viruses and can make much bigger jumps). In fact the current situation is still specific to the UK in that it seems to have mutated here and other countries have some warning of its arrival. If it wasn't for the massively increased transmissibility full lockdown would still be the wrong thing to do.No, it’s because people with far more knowledge than me about this were saying it.
Exactly. Those are the people who DON’T need it cos they’ve got money coming in. They are idiots. It’s those in the gig economy or on zero hours that need help.So fucked if you’re on just above to not qualify for benefits, but definitely not on enough to cope with loss of pay.
Something else to point out is that the reason it's all dragged on for so long is that the restrictions have been so half hearted.
If we'd had a few months of genuine lockdown, with proper support, where everything which wasn't genuinely essential was shut, we'd be in a far, far better position now.
I also think that if it had been done in a way which stressed how serious and how important it was, we might have had less of the bullshit about making exceptions and people thinking it was OK to bend the rules a little, because it can't really hurt, can it...
China, but not nationally.is there any country that has done this?
I still blame that sleazy fuck Cummings and the government for letting him get away with it. You could almost hear the country saying, "well if it's OK for him to break the rules, fuck it..."
In the face of a global pandemic I’ve tended to prioritise the views of those urging caution and giving warnings. Safe over sorry etc.Plenty of people with far more knowledge than you were saying other things. How did you choose?
Exactly. Those are the people who DON’T need it cos they’ve got money coming in. They are idiots. It’s those in the gig economy or on zero hours that need help.
I don't remember any serious scientists calling for a full lockdown in October
Got to be on
- Universal Credit
- Working Tax Credits
- Income-related Employment and Support Allowance
- income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance
- income Support
- Pension Credit
- Housing Benefit
By those rules Mr W (who doesn't go out to work) would get the £500 (ESA and housing benefit in his name) but I (who work full time) wouldn't, despite us sharing the household bills and essentially having a joint low income.So fucked if you’re on just above to not qualify for benefits, but definitely not on enough to cope with loss of pay.
Apart from those who did?I don't remember any serious scientists calling for a full lockdown in October
Circuit breaker a bit different from what we need now no?Independent Sage calls for immediate lockdown - Research Professional News
Warning comes after government disregarded advice from official Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencieswww.researchprofessionalnews.com
I don’t need it and wouldn’t accept it though. The money should be there to support people who would otherwise be forced to go to work.Well, benefits isn’t enough to live on so I don’t begrudge them extra at all. For me it’s a principle of universality. If you have to self isolate you get paid well to do so.
Well, a circuit breaker to my understanding is a national lockdown but for a shorter period. Point is they were saying the Tier system won't be enough. And it hasn't been.Circuit breaker a bit different from what we need now no?
For two three weeks.Independent Sage calls for immediate lockdown - Research Professional News
Warning comes after government disregarded advice from official Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencieswww.researchprofessionalnews.com
Yes there is, but even if there wasn't, that isn't in itself an argument against doing it.is there any country that has done this?
So that's why Wales is doing so well?Well, a circuit breaker to my understanding is a national lockdown but for a shorter period. Point is they were saying the Tier system won't be enough. And it hasn't been.
I don’t need it and wouldn’t accept it though. The money should be there to support people who would otherwise be forced to go to work.
Aside from the suggestion of China which was regional not national which country?Yes there is, but even if there wasn't, that isn't in itself an argument against doing it.
The circuit breaker was very effective. Welsh government absolutely fucked it by completely opening up way too fast afterwards, or by not staying in for longer, but the problem wasn't the circuit break.So that's why Wales is doing so well?
Fair enoughIt’s a broader political principle for me. I think things that are universal help create a sense of a collective identity. I don’t mind if some benefit when they might not really need it if the overall outcome is that all those who would need it do benefit.
And this of course is a far easier system to administer, and would almost certainly save costs in the long run.It’s a broader political principle for me. I think things that are universal help create a sense of a collective identity. I don’t mind if some benefit when they might not really need it if the overall outcome is that all those who would need it do benefit.
Fair enough
Shut the fucking schools for fuck's sakes and provide proper support for parents who are struggling.The circuit breaker was very effective. Welsh government absolutely fucked it by completely opening up way too fast afterwards, or by not staying in for longer, but the problem wasn't the circuit break.
Wales' firebreak lockdown most effective at cutting Covid reproduction rate, study shows
Wales’ firebreak lockdown in October and November was the most effective at reducing the Covid-19 reproduction rate – cutting it by 44 per cent, a study has found. In comparison, England’s four-week November tier system lockdown only cut the ‘R rate’ by 10 per cent under Tier Three measures and...nation.cymru
However, the effectiveness of Wales’ lockdown at cutting the R-rate was reduced to 32 per cent when schools reopened, and Northern Ireland’s to 22 per cent when schools reopened.
Ringer gangs coming off furloughLoads of cars missing from my street since Christmas eve.
Yup, lots of us are caught out that way. Mrs LR and I aren’t married but her work pension counts against my UC, and the level of income I had in my self employment in the 12 months before lockdown 1 was shit, so if they use that as a gauge I’m fucked too.By those rules Mr W (who doesn't go out to work) would get the £500 (ESA and housing benefit in his name) but I (who work full time) wouldn't, despite us sharing the household bills and essentially having a joint low income.
Agree with you editor.Despite that, I still think we should have an immediate sensible lockdown for three weeks minimum. For me, that means keeping risky spaces like gyms, hairdressers and schools closed.
Shops have to stay open and so should parks because people need to feel what little sunshine they can get and walking is essential to mental health.