Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Should There Be A Tier 5 Or Another Third National Lockdown?

No, it’s because people with far more knowledge than me about this were saying it.
I don't remember any serious scientists calling for a full lockdown in October and most sources have been downplaying the possible consequences of mutation in this virus. On the whole coronaviruses mutate much less readily than flu viruses for instance (which are capable of merging with other flu viruses and can make much bigger jumps). In fact the current situation is still specific to the UK in that it seems to have mutated here and other countries have some warning of its arrival. If it wasn't for the massively increased transmissibility full lockdown would still be the wrong thing to do.
 
So fucked if you’re on just above to not qualify for benefits, but definitely not on enough to cope with loss of pay.
Exactly. Those are the people who DON’T need it cos they’ve got money coming in. They are idiots. It’s those in the gig economy or on zero hours that need help.

edit: actually you can get it when employed:
AAC8B888-E127-474E-A803-915E5761B829.png
 
Something else to point out is that the reason it's all dragged on for so long is that the restrictions have been so half hearted.

If we'd had a few months of genuine lockdown, with proper support, where everything which wasn't genuinely essential was shut, we'd be in a far, far better position now.

I also think that if it had been done in a way which stressed how serious and how important it was, we might have had less of the bullshit about making exceptions and people thinking it was OK to bend the rules a little, because it can't really hurt, can it...

is there any country that has done this?
 
I still blame that sleazy fuck Cummings and the government for letting him get away with it. You could almost hear the country saying, "well if it's OK for him to break the rules, fuck it..."

OH yeah, and the Sage guy with his GF coming round, the one with the second house, SMP getting the train. Comings was definitely the most blatent example of 1 rule for x. That stuff doesn't make me think it's fine to go to a party or hang around with a massive group in the park. But it makes me feel less guilty about bending the rules that I might have anyway.

E.g. I met friends for drinks in the park back around then. Which IIRC was fine. But going into their flat to use the toilet, was against the rules.
 
Exactly. Those are the people who DON’T need it cos they’ve got money coming in. They are idiots. It’s those in the gig economy or on zero hours that need help.

Well, benefits isn’t enough to live on so I don’t begrudge them extra at all. For me it’s a principle of universality. If you have to self isolate you get paid well to do so.
 
Got to be on

  • Universal Credit
  • Working Tax Credits
  • Income-related Employment and Support Allowance
  • income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance
  • income Support
  • Pension Credit
  • Housing Benefit
So fucked if you’re on just above to not qualify for benefits, but definitely not on enough to cope with loss of pay.
By those rules Mr W (who doesn't go out to work) would get the £500 (ESA and housing benefit in his name) but I (who work full time) wouldn't, despite us sharing the household bills and essentially having a joint low income.
 
Well, benefits isn’t enough to live on so I don’t begrudge them extra at all. For me it’s a principle of universality. If you have to self isolate you get paid well to do so.
I don’t need it and wouldn’t accept it though. The money should be there to support people who would otherwise be forced to go to work.
 
I don’t need it and wouldn’t accept it though. The money should be there to support people who would otherwise be forced to go to work.

It’s a broader political principle for me. I think things that are universal help create a sense of a collective identity. I don’t mind if some benefit when they might not really need it if the overall outcome is that all those who would need it do benefit.
 
So that's why Wales is doing so well?
The circuit breaker was very effective. Welsh government absolutely fucked it by completely opening up way too fast afterwards, or by not staying in for longer, but the problem wasn't the circuit break.
 
Last edited:
It’s a broader political principle for me. I think things that are universal help create a sense of a collective identity. I don’t mind if some benefit when they might not really need it if the overall outcome is that all those who would need it do benefit.
Fair enough :eek:
 
It’s a broader political principle for me. I think things that are universal help create a sense of a collective identity. I don’t mind if some benefit when they might not really need it if the overall outcome is that all those who would need it do benefit.
And this of course is a far easier system to administer, and would almost certainly save costs in the long run.
 
The circuit breaker in Wales wasn't enough. It was a lockdown, for 2 weeks. And it was an idea stolen from Johnson himself who advocated it for about 2 minutes, after stealing the very idea from Singapore.

It did immediately flatten out the curve a little, even pushed it the other way. But 2 weeks was never going to be enough and it was tokenism from the Senedd, who wanted to be seen to be 'doing something' while Johnson floundered.

The circuit breaker not being enough isn't an argument for no lockdown. It's an argument for a fuller, longer lockdown.

And, tbh, fuck the 'glee' stuff. Where do those who are suggesting it think this 'glee' is coming from? A love of repression? That seems to be the suggestion. And stuff those who might just be suggesting harder lockdowns as the only way out of it?

Glee? Life is miserable right now. My life has totally changed. And I'd like a way out of that. But the way out is not more half-arsed measures that will produce more of the same. I'd quite like an end to this. But killing more people doesn't seem an option when you are one of those possible people.

Can't help thinking if thus virus started killing a few more non-vulnerable under 60s then some non-vulnerable under 60s might change their tune on here. And that, of course, would be pretty selfish of them if it's true.

Away with your glee. I'm just kinda touchy about dying.
 
The circuit breaker was very effective. Welsh government absolutely fucked it by completely opening up way too fast afterwards, or by not staying in for longer, but the problem wasn't the circuit break.
Shut the fucking schools for fuck's sakes and provide proper support for parents who are struggling.

However, the effectiveness of Wales’ lockdown at cutting the R-rate was reduced to 32 per cent when schools reopened, and Northern Ireland’s to 22 per cent when schools reopened.
 
I haven't earned a penny since March and I've got no prospect of any work in the foreseeable future. The government has given me a paltry £1,700 to cover the entire period so I'm burning through my savings at a depressing rate. Everything I do is linked to the hospitality trade so there's zero prospect of things improving.

Despite that, I still think we should have an immediate sensible lockdown for three weeks minimum. For me, that means keeping risky spaces like gyms, hairdressers and schools closed.
Shops have to stay open and so should parks because people need to feel what little sunshine they can get and walking is essential to mental health.
 
By those rules Mr W (who doesn't go out to work) would get the £500 (ESA and housing benefit in his name) but I (who work full time) wouldn't, despite us sharing the household bills and essentially having a joint low income.
Yup, lots of us are caught out that way. Mrs LR and I aren’t married but her work pension counts against my UC, and the level of income I had in my self employment in the 12 months before lockdown 1 was shit, so if they use that as a gauge I’m fucked too.

I mean we’re OK. We aren’t destitute. But real people’s real situations fall between the cracks.
 
Despite that, I still think we should have an immediate sensible lockdown for three weeks minimum. For me, that means keeping risky spaces like gyms, hairdressers and schools closed.
Shops have to stay open and so should parks because people need to feel what little sunshine they can get and walking is essential to mental health.
Agree with you editor.
Parks and seasides were closed in Turkey for months. You couldn't access beaches because they were all taped up and police/army patrolled. That just led to silly situations where people had to walk in the middle of roads to get any exercise.
 
Back
Top Bottom