Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

'Needle spiking' in UK nightclubs wtf?

Did write the story (or what I know of it) here, but thought maybe it was too personal.

Anyway, summary is.... I'm highly skeptical they were even spiked by any needle or sharp thing, let alone drugged. (And not drink spiked in any way either.) Sounds like A&E didn't think it likely either. They're out and home now. But they and their friends are telling everyone it's happened.
 
I recommend reading / audio booking ā€œMen Who Hate Womenā€ to anyone who cares about gender and sex-based discrimination / violence. Itā€™s important and too many people donā€™t know this stuff.

I downloaded and have got through 70% of it
Itā€™s fucking relentless and I have never heard of half of this online shit

Iā€™ve edited as Iā€™m not sure my post gives the book best service

A bit of an eye opener/educator just read it
 
Last edited:
I have absolutely no doubt there are pieces of shit out there who would very happily inject drugs into strangers, for various reasons that only make sense if you're a piece of shit. I base my belief on the proven fact that there are pieces of shit out there who do spike drinks, who rob and rape both men and women, and occasionally kill them. I am just doubting that very many have the necessary ability to carry it out. I might be wrong.
 
There are also probably people out there who enjoy covertly jabbing things into people for shits n giggles in view of all the hype, even if it's just with a wooden toothpick. In the current climate, it must be terrifying to be jabbed by an unseen person in a nightclub and it's not surprising the victim feels out of sorts.
 
Yes, there's lots of investigation across the country now. But I'd rather err on the side of believing anyone who reports a potential needle spiking incident until it's proven otherwise.

Women are often conditioned to think they won't be believed in so many circumstances (and indeed, that's often the case). So the least I can do is believe someone.
 
Yes, there's lots of investigation across the country now. But I'd rather err on the side of believing anyone who reports a potential needle spiking incident until it's proven otherwise.

Women are often conditioned to think they won't be believed in so many circumstances (and indeed, that's often the case). So the least I can do is believe someone.
Do you believe Carl Jonjo Morgan from Cardiff?
 
Yes, there's lots of investigation across the country now. But I'd rather err on the side of believing anyone who reports a potential needle spiking incident until it's proven otherwise.

Women are often conditioned to think they won't be believed in so many circumstances (and indeed, that's often the case). So the least I can do is believe someone.
You cannot prove it otherwise if it did not happen. Basic scientific rigour
 
You cannot prove it otherwise if it did not happen. Basic scientific rigour
I said I would believe it until proved otherwise. I've posted on this thread about the way women are not believed, dismissed, and I am not doing that to another woman.

And respectfully, you can't prove it didn't happen.
 
I said I would believe it until proved otherwise. I've posted on this thread about the way women are not believed, dismissed, and I am not doing that to another woman.

And respectfully, you can't prove it didn't
If a woman or indeed man has informed you of such occurrences then of course you must believe them. Until then all we have to go on is the Nuneaton Bungle
 
I said I would believe it until proved otherwise. I've posted on this thread about the way women are not believed, dismissed, and I am not doing that to another woman.

And respectfully, you can't prove it didn't happen.
Well youā€™re no more likely to be shown proof that itā€™s not happening than you are to be shown proof that aliens arenā€™t abducting people. You can look at the facts though, and see that out of all of these hospitalisations, not a single one has shown drugs to have been administered. Not a single person has been caught in the act of injecting someone or found in possession of a syringe, and no discarded syringes have been found. You might also ask why all of these attacks have resulted in invisible or tiny pin pricks, when injecting someone is actually quite difficult, especially through clothing and if theyā€™re moving around. Injections are often bloody painful, yet nobody seems to have pulled away when jabbed and torn their skin or broken a needle. Youā€™d expect at least some of these types of assaults to be unsuccessful, yet thereā€™ve been no reports of any failed attacks. Every one of them has been delivered with a bloodless and painless, medical precision, that a trained nurse (in clinical conditions) would be proud of; leaving no trace whatsoever, nor any victim with any recollection of the actual, highly invasive, spiking. Nobody has said to anyone ā€œthat bloke just stuck a needle in meā€.

Put yourself in the would-be assailantā€™s shoes. Do you think you could inject someone in a bar without them or anyone else noticing, even if they were shit-faced?

Itā€™s not unreasonable to consider that maybe this thing has fuelled itself and that people are now reporting having been jabbed in the genuine belief that thatā€™s what happened, when the reality is something else.
 
Last edited:
Did write the story (or what I know of it) here, but thought maybe it was too personal.

Anyway, summary is.... I'm highly skeptical they were even spiked by any needle or sharp thing, let alone drugged. (And not drink spiked in any way either.) Sounds like A&E didn't think it likely either. They're out and home now. But they and their friends are telling everyone it's happened.

What's the main reason for your scepticism?
 
What's the main reason for your scepticism?

Short version is they fell over/slipped/went dizzy/freaked out (unclear why exactly) and banged their head. Friend called ambulance. Went to A&E. No mention of being spiked until their friend suggested it, then they saw a tiny red patch on their leg. Escalated. Now they and their friend (who vomitted, to me clearly drunk) are both saying they must have been needle spiked. I know them well. I'm not surprised by this turn of events.
 
I read the article. I have a few points.

The article is from 2007. That's 14 years ago. I would definitely argue that it is out of date with regards to the prevalence of drink spiking.

The article makes a suggestion that at least one woman who was admitted and tested was raped.

The article admits that some of those tested
likely spiked with additional units of alcohol.

I don't agree with the methodology used. They had 75 people present at the a&e allegding spiking. Therefore they should have tested everyone who presented, not a selection of them .

The article further presents evidence that spiking may be prevalent at two local premises, which is useful information.

Overall I think it's a better study than the last one, but it is flawed due to the testing inconsistency and is probably out of date with regards to prevalence of spiking.

hi.

i agree with your critique of the article, it's not very good, and though it's published in 2007, data was collected in 2004 - so 17 yrs old. the 'discussion' is speculative & in parts provocative. there is no explanation given for the rather low percentage of testing.

the results, however, is consistent with other studies (few & far inbetween); there is one from the same time period from st thomas, london, where 75 of 78 patients presenting at the ed 'alleging they had consumed a spiked drink' had urine samples tested for drugs & found 'unexplained sedative drug exposure' in 2 patients (3%). it concludes:

'Use of sedative drugs to spike drinks may not be as common as reported in the mainstream media. A large number of study participants had serum ethanol concentrations associated with significant intoxication; the source (personal overā€consumption or deliberate drink spiking) is unclear.'


(patients presenting 'with an allegation of sexual assault' were referred to 'a dedicated clinical and forensic service' and not included in the study.)

there is an australian systematic review of the current evidence on drug facilitated sexual assault (dfsa) from 2017 by laura jane anderson et al:


(link to abstract, full article paywalled)

there is some more recent articles that seems to show similar results; 'opportunistic' dfsa is the norm, 'proactive/predatory' dfsa seems to account for less than ten, probably even <5% of the investigated cases in most studies.

there is also an italian review from 2019, by f.p. busardo et al, that seems to have made a extremely thorough search of the litterature & institutional reports, which can be downloaded as a free pdf. that might be a good starting point if anyone really wants to dive deep into the subject.

 
So.... someone I know says this happened to them last night. They felt a pinprick on their leg at a nightclub, and then started feeling 'whoozy'. Been in A&E since early hours of this morning. The bit between this happening and then ending up in A&E is unclear at the moment (unclear as in not told me yet, rather than they can't recall). One of their friends at the same club is also claiming to feel drugged.
Interesting to hear that they thought it was the leg, again- came up a few times earlier in the thread. I suppose that's one way of doing it and not being seen.
 
Back
Top Bottom