moochedit
I'm not feeding seagulls
No publicity is bad publicity (don't think that's true in this case though)Masterstroke by their PR department to raise their Corporate Visibility
No publicity is bad publicity (don't think that's true in this case though)Masterstroke by their PR department to raise their Corporate Visibility
Don't recognise that atm. I assume from a sci fi film?No seems to have noticed my post from earlier this morning
Here is the news.
Nothing happened today.
Good night.
Don't recognise that atm. I assume from a sci fi film?
There's no reason for huge outages in North America. By the time they woke up, Australia and Europe had been on it for hours. While it's certainly disruptive, a good priority list of services to fix first should see minimal down time. It took us, a medium sized University, about 3 hours to get everything important up and running and we have absolutely no out of hours support. A properly staffed place should have had everything fixed by the time the working day started in the US.So. I'm really sorry to spoil everyone's fun by doing fact-checking and stuff, but -
Here's a screenshot from that Flightradar playback in the tweet, towards the end:
View attachment 434004
Observation no. 1:
I can't recreate that on flightradar myself. I get this:
View attachment 434000
Observation no. 2:
This is what I get for the same time yesterday, (12.00UTC, 18th July)
View attachment 434001
Well, it looks to me like the US airspace was busier during this supposed meltdown than it was 24 hrs later.
So. I'm really sorry to spoil everyone's fun by doing fact-checking and stuff, but -
Here's a screenshot from that Flightradar playback in the tweet, towards the end:
View attachment 434004
Observation no. 1:
I can't recreate that on flightradar myself. I get this:
View attachment 434000
Observation no. 2:
This is what I get for the same time yesterday, (12.00UTC, 18th July)
View attachment 434001
Well, it looks to me like the US airspace was busier during this supposed meltdown than it was 24 hrs later.
Airplanes were and are in the air. Do you think this means that they therefore are being controlled, directed or navigated normally just because their engines worked & they got off the ground?So. I'm really sorry to spoil everyone's fun by doing fact-checking and stuff, but -
Here's a screenshot from that Flightradar playback in the tweet, towards the end:
View attachment 434004
Observation no. 1:
I can't recreate that on flightradar myself. I get this:
View attachment 434000
Observation no. 2:
This is what I get for the same time yesterday, (12.00UTC, 18th July)
View attachment 434001
Well, it looks to me like the US airspace was busier during this supposed meltdown than it was 24 hrs later.
More exciting no doubt too.I would, a blank screen would be considerably more enjoyable.
I'm really good at keeping certain users on ignore but when there's a clear amount of correcting and fact checking going on I do have a peak behind the curtain. It's surely 90-odd percent trolling? I can't believe in this era of messageboards that there are people who still use their accounts for thatEarlier today teuchter took the piss that around 1,000 flights had been cancelled, saying that was fairly normal.
The figure is now getting close to 4,500, and that is expected to continue to increase as time goes on.
You do seem to know a lot about this.it's the Skynet symbol from he Terminator films
I went back and gave it a sympathy Like
You’ve got no right to talk about trolling given the dodgy far right Twitter links you post without commentremember the mighty yahoo message boards from a decade and a half ago? collapsed, disbanded and brought down by uncontrollable trolls; just like you know here...
And then get them to set fire to someone's shed.He'd make the kids do it themselves - austerity, its good for them
You do seem to know a lot about this.
There's a great big collapse coming if this and the previous scam happens again. I work in medical records and we're still hobbling on with computers which are way too old for what's expected of them.The plane impact is what it is and how long it lasts is what it is...
The big issue in this country is impact on the health service. Thats no joke, and we know how creaking the infrastructure is anyway without having to deal with this.
Likely none. ATC won't be, either. But scheduling, ticketing, baggage management, etc?How many planes rely on windows hosts to remain airborne?
There are some Boeing planes That still use Windows 95. There’s a guy in the US who has the last warehouse of floppy discs for them. Mostly used actually exclusively used on internal flights I believe. Can’t remember model.How many planes rely on windows hosts to remain airborne?
There are some Boeing planes That still use Windows 95. There’s a guy in the US who has the last warehouse of floppy discs for them. Mostly used actually exclusively used on internal flights I believe. Can’t remember model.
It's not the actual flight systems though. The planes in question fly just fine without that system being active.There are some Boeing planes That still use Windows 95. There’s a guy in the US who has the last warehouse of floppy discs for them. Mostly used actually exclusively used on internal flights I believe. Can’t remember model.
ATC and most backend airlines systems are based on z/TPF or MVS, with the odd Linux server farm thrown in as needed. The problem is many of if not most of the customer interface system such as check-in, ticket sales, customer service (who will have had a busy day today) baggage claim etc rely on a PC interface for whichever hapless Joe (or Jane) is directly sat across from the customer to access those systems. Doesn't matter how well the back end system is working if all the check-in clerk can see is the BSOD. (You ain't flying today mate!) Cancelled flights doesn't really mean there is no plane flying it might very well just mean there are no paying passengers on it.Likely none. ATC won't be, either. But scheduling, ticketing, baggage management, etc?
This I think is an urban myth, they might very well use Pentium or even i386/486 processors but not Windows 95. I know that Rolls-Royce engines use custom built programmed modules that use C code written in house by their own development team. I applied for a job there back in the 90's (didn't get it). I would imagine other engine and aircraft makers are probably the same.There are some Boeing planes That still use Windows 95. There’s a guy in the US who has the last warehouse of floppy discs for them. Mostly used actually exclusively used on internal flights I believe. Can’t remember model.
It's not the actual flight systems though. The planes in question fly just fine without that system being active.
It's sort of irrelevant - flight systems do not and never will automatically update over the air for precisely this reason.