Seek therapy. I don't agree with virtually none of the Guardian but I still read it occasionally.
Explain the warmongering over Iran in rational terms. It is an interesting topic, albeit a sensitive one. I am sure U75 will cope. I struggle!
hth:
Not comparable, no nuclear war was ever likely.The genocide and devestation that occurred in Ireland over the years of British oppression would indicate otherwise.
Lunatic is a rather meaningless term. However, as we saw with Trump, it is quite possible for someone who may not have the cognitive capacity to fulfill the Intense, challenging, multifaceted demands that being a Head of Government demands to achieve such a position.
Talking about the horrors visited on Ireland and the Irish people for generations and generations. Right up to very recently. And some might well say still suffering at the indignity of a partition visited upon the island.Not comparable, no nuclear war was ever likely.
You can say a lot of shit about trump but it's clear he had and has the cognitive capacity to fulfil the job of POTUS. He might be a terrible prick, he might be deluded and narcissistic, but he does know what he's doing.
I agree "lunatic" is a pretty meaningless term, I just don't like it when people chuck around mental health insults instead of making actual points, especially when they're trying to be comedic with it.
And they had to keep putting his own name in various sentences in briefing papers to try to get him to pay attention when reading them.I have half a shelf of books by Wolf, Bernstein and that cunt with the tache which claim that Trump wasn't capable, which is why so much of the time his presidency was in the edge. He came across as volatile; unreliable; either unwilling or unable to follow complex issues and easily influenced by the last person he met, eager to do what they said if they impressed him. His delusion driven attempts to remain in office and the calamity at the Capitol are a reflection of this
As for war with Iran, Protag , Israel doesn't actually want that. It's not remotely in Israeli interests to have a full-on war with the Islamic Republic. Israel is surrounded by potential allies of Iran and despite Iran's so-called pariah status (and the high probability that the USA would leap in to defend Israel) the danger for that very tiny state in provoking a war with half the Muslim countries of the world (possibly even all of them except Saudi Arabia) would be immense, very likely an existential threat.
In short, Bibi can whip up hysteria over Iran all he wants, it doesn't mean a thing, it's just his usual demagoguery. Plus if Trump wins in 2024, Israel may no longer have the big US ally it has had in the past.
So yeah, don't worry; the situation in Ukraine is still more dangerous for us than anything likely to happen in Israel. Unfortunately the same can't be said for the Palestinian people, but that's not really what we're talking about here.
Syria, to some degree Lebanon may be actual or potentially natural allies of Iran, but Egypt and Jordan definitely aren't.
I have half a shelf of books by Wolf, Bernstein and that cunt with the tache which claim that Trump wasn't capable, which is why so much of the time his presidency was in the edge. He came across as volatile; unreliable; either unwilling or unable to follow complex issues and easily influenced by the last person he met, eager to do what they said if they impressed him. His delusion driven attempts to remain in office and the calamity at the Capitol are a reflection of this
You'll have seen the word 'potential', right? And the more Israel abuses the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, the more that potential grows. I'd add that Israel has no obvious allies in its own region, not even against Iran. Potentially Saudi Arabia but I really doubt they'd side with Israel against any Muslim state, not even Iran.
He did serve his term and he may well win a second. However, he brought the USA to the brink of civil conflict and left it a diminished power on the international stageThat's all very well, but he served out his term and may even win a second. Pretty good going for someone 'incapable' of being president of the USA.
Ease up on the snide mental health gags, there's a good chap.Seek therapy. I don't agree with virtually none of the Guardian but I still read it occasionally.
Wow. That's some fairly complete lack of self-awareness...And they had to keep putting his own name in various sentences in briefing papers to try to get him to pay attention when reading them.
Iran and Israel are both outliers in the region as predominantly non-Arab majority entities. Iran is further marginalized by being a Shi'a theocratic state.
The Egyptian regime will be happy to see Hamas neutralised because it is an offshoot of the Islamic Brotherhood movement that was briefly in power in Egypt after the fall of Mubarak and was then crushed after the Sisi coup. The Egyptians are also brutally putting down resistance to central rule in the Sinai region. The regime will make noises about Israeli crimes, but they signed a treaty with Israel back in 1979 and will keep basically friendly relations. Egypt is a military dictatorship so the feelings of the people on the street are not that relevant.
The latter is true for the Saudis too, and Saudi would like to collaborate with Israel because without Israeli approval their plans for Neom will be fettered. The Saudi (the Crown Prince's) dream is to create and pan-national economic zone around the Gulf of Aqaba where the borders if Egypt Jordan and Saudi Arabia almost meet. However, there is also a sliver of Israel around Eilat separating Jordan and Egypt.
I know this but it's good to have it all posted as background so thanks.
Are you saying all this makes war between Israel and Iran more likely, or less likely? I still think less. I maintain Bibi and the other hawkish errr 'nutters' in Israel like to go on about Iran for populist reasons, but without an actual go-ahead from Washington would and will never go for it.
Don't they both need each other as paper enemies to actually go to war? Both Iran and Israel seem to have their proxies to do their dirty work without engaging in full scale direct conflict
I thought Israel was the proxy. So them fighting Hamas is essentially a proxy war between the US and Iran.
No. The guy is a complete lunatic, and considering the state of Israeli politics, that is quite a feat.
Azerbaijan for a start, who the Israelis gave recent support enabling them to defeat the Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh. Iran is Azerbaijan's neighbour and most ethnic Azerbaijanis live in the Iranian Azerbaijani provinces where Iran do not want separatist movements emerging.Who is Israel's proxy in this scenario?