Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Hamas/Israel conflict: news and discussion

All the facts in the report are themselves easily checkable.

But here we see the power of propaganda. It leaves its mark even after it is debunked.
It hasn't been debunked. There were claims from civilian first responders that haven't yet been debunked or confirmed, possibly because they lied, possibly because they didn't know the difference between a baby who had been beheaded versus one that had had its head blown off with a gun, or possibly because nobody wants to go around showing pictures of babies with no heads.

Seriously, have a fucking word with yourself. Multiple babies were executed by Hamas. The 'lucky' ones were merely kidnapped and/or orphaned. Why is this the hill you want to die on. You and fucking Dwyer.
 
All the facts in the report are themselves easily checkable.

So what. It doesn't disprove anything at all. The video didn't even address the most compelling beheaded baby accounts.

But here we see the power of propaganda. It leaves its mark even after it is debunked.

It's not debunked though is it. Do you want me to trawl through Twitter and Telegram and find some more murder porn for you? Children tied together and tortured, people burned alive, all that sort of stuff? There are lots of videos made by the Hammas terrorists and recovered from their corpses by first responders. There's also footage of autopsy details. Do you think if I make a dossier it might be equivalently bad in your mind to the beheading of babies? Will that satisfy you?

Or maybe we can compile some interviews and other accounts about actual beheaded babies, omitted from the Hammas-backer's video you posted - maybe you'd prefer that? Maybe that would really make a difference to how you or anyone else views the actions of terrorists.
 

Strike hits area around Rafah crossing​

An airstrike has hit the area around the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt, the BBC correspondent in the Gaza Strip, Rushdi Abu Alouf has confirmed.
The building on the Palestinian side of the crossing has been damaged as well as the road.
There were no immediate reports of casualties.
On Monday, crowds gathered at Rafah following reports that the crossing would be temporarily reopened during a brief ceasefire.
Both Israel and Hamas have denied this and a UN spokesperson has said there has been no progress on full reopening.
 
That's incredibly depressing. I really do wish that in the opening paragraph though, Al Jezeera hadn't referred to the Hamas bloodbath as simply a 'surprise attack'. It's very much downplaying the narrative and that feeds into this disparity, as what western govt would align themselves with it?
Al Jazeera is far from being a bastion of impartiality.
 
If you haven’t seen the BBC description of the Palestine protests as supporting Hamas and their later retraction.

Their original position must have been given the green light by more than one person. How did this happen in the first place?

 

Strike hits area around Rafah crossing​

An airstrike has hit the area around the Rafah crossing between Gaza and Egypt, the BBC correspondent in the Gaza Strip, Rushdi Abu Alouf has confirmed.
The building on the Palestinian side of the crossing has been damaged as well as the road.
There were no immediate reports of casualties.
On Monday, crowds gathered at Rafah following reports that the crossing would be temporarily reopened during a brief ceasefire.
Both Israel and Hamas have denied this and a UN spokesperson has said there has been no progress on full reopening.
if there is more airstrikes could Egypt get involved military
 
What's worse, Hamas gunmen who kill and torture civilians and film all the horror, or Israeli pilots who (so far) kill and maim more than twice as many but don't film it all?
 
Hamas gunmen who kill and torture civilians.

Or do you think allied bomber pilots in ww2 were worse than concentration camp commandants?
Thanks for saying what you think here. Let's leave other conflicts out of this discussion for now, particularly WW2.

What makes Hamas worse, from the point of view of the victim? A child shot dead by Hamas suffers just as much as a child bombed and killed by Israeli jets. A child shot and wounded by Hamas suffers just as much as a child bombed and maimed by the Israelis, trapped for god knows how long under rubble. There could be situations where one group of perpetrators of violence have a better and higher moral standing than another. I don't see it in this case.

Whether or not Hamas committed particular atrocities does matter, because the emotive effect of personal direct violence on our understanding and our reactions can blind us to the reality. If I press a button and thousands die the moral responsibility does not go away, simply because I am not face to face with my victim, or because I do not have blood on my hands. Or because I do not film it. Or because I look the other way, or blame someone else, or look for excuses and justifications.
 
I don't know, you haven't made a case for it. Actually I think you're probably wrong / barking up the wrong tree, and it's silly to just make some generalised, provocative statement then go 'you agree with me, right?' Well, no, I don't agree, but if you have a case to make then make it.

Sorry, missed this earlier.

You ask me to make the case that the Western MSM is pro-Zionist. Well, consider the fact that afaics not a single Western MSM outlet has reported that 800 Israelis stormed the al-Asqa mosque on 10/05, i.e. two days before Hamas' invasion.

I put it to you that this strongly resembles a deliberately co-ordinated policy of falsifying the situation by omission of salient information.
 
That ship sailed back on Oct 9th.

I think what Godwin was pointing out with his law, which we've all seen demonstrated countless times, is that any discussion online will likely result in Nazi analogies if it goes on for long enough, whether the discussion involves parking laws, flower arranging, or stamp collecting - of course such analogies are likely to emerge sooner in a discussion of wartime atrocities.
 
Thanks for saying what you think here. Let's leave other conflicts out of this discussion for now, particularly WW2.

What makes Hamas worse, from the point of view of the victim? A child shot dead by Hamas suffers just as much as a child bombed and killed by Israeli jets. A child shot and wounded by Hamas suffers just as much as a child bombed and maimed by the Israelis, trapped for god knows how long under rubble. There could be situations where one group of perpetrators of violence have a better and higher moral standing than another. I don't see it in this case.

Whether or not Hamas committed particular atrocities does matter, because the emotive effect of personal direct violence on our understanding and our reactions can blind us to the reality. If I press a button and thousands die the moral responsibility does not go away, simply because I am not face to face with my victim, or because I do not have blood on my hands. Or because I do not film it. Or because I look the other way, or blame someone else, or look for excuses and justifications.

I would have thought what matters is the intent. That’s why in this country someone who sadistically tortures and murders will get a harsher sentence than someone who kills through gross negligence or by taking self-defence too far. The “worseness” of a crime isn’t defined purely by body count or extent of injury inflicted, but to a large extent by motive and circumstances.
 
Back
Top Bottom