FridgeMagnet
Administrator
Here's a thing from the FT about increasing internal dissatisfaction with the way AI systems work, even within the companies concerned, and the absurd token efforts over "AI ethics": Subscribe to read | Financial Times
In response to criticism not only from campaigners and academics but also their own staff, companies have begun to self-regulate by trying to set up their own “AI ethics” initiatives that perform roles ranging from academic research — as in the case of Google-owned DeepMind’s Ethics and Society division — to formulating guidelines and convening external oversight panels.
The efforts have led to a fragmented landscape of efforts that both supporters and critics agree have not yet had demonstrable outcomes beyond igniting a debate around the topic of AI and its social implications.
In Google’s case, its external advisory council on AI lasted only a week before its employees revolted at the appointment of Kay Coles James, from the conservative Heritage Foundation think-tank, and shut it down earlier this month.
Luciano Floridi, who was one of the advisers and is director of the Digital Ethics Lab at Oxford, said the board has been planning to help Google navigate its trickiest dilemmas. “Some projects are perfectly legal, but may not be what people expect from a company like Google or the values it has committed to,” he said.