taffboy gwyrdd
Embrace the confusion!
Lying assholes tend to inflame my tourettes.
You said I couldnt prove those weapons existed. They do. you moved the goalposts. let's leave it there.
Lying assholes tend to inflame my tourettes.
You said I couldnt prove those weapons existed. They do. you moved the goalposts. let's leave it there.
The article, as you have no doubt discovered by now, is immaculately sourced.
You continue to present this as a popularity contest, as opposed to a logical discussion.
You continue to rage and storm, to swear and curse, thus revealing your utter impotence in rational debate.
You have, patently and manifestly, lost the argument.
Perhaps you should now consider leaving this discourse to those who are capable of conducting themselves in a civilized fashion?
wonder if Clapham Boy and 8den are related? They both seem to have the twat gene
ding ding round 12
wonder if Clapham Boy and 8den are related? They both seem to have the twat gene
That's just a load of random mock ups of zero use to anyone.Indeed it features this page on the flash presentation (and no others identified as for Barbara Olson).
You have not proved that those weapons existed in 2001. Fail.You said I couldnt prove those weapons existed. They do. you moved the goalposts. let's leave it there.
yes thank you 8den. David Ray Griffin's revised article is here.Except of course for all the stuff it gets flat out wrong.
Care to respond to my post Dr Jazzz?
What do you think they were doing in the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui then?That's just a load of random mock ups of zero use to anyone.
yes thank you 8den. David Ray Griffin's revised article is here.
Could Barbara Olson Have Made Those Calls?
An Analysis of New Evidence about Onboard Phones
Regardless of the question of whether flight 77 did have seat phones (it seems probable they did not after all) the facts remain that Olson changed his story, and that the FBI's report does not support any such call existing.
yes thank you 8den. David Ray Griffin's revised article is here.
Could Barbara Olson Have Made Those Calls?
An Analysis of New Evidence about Onboard Phones
Regardless of the question of whether flight 77 did have seat phones (it seems probable they did not after all) the facts remain that Olson changed his story, and that the FBI's report does not support any such call existing.
Lori Lynn Keyton, Secretary, Department of Justice (DOJ), Washington, D.C., telephone number (202) [redacted, date of birth [redacted] was contacted telephonically at her residence through the DOJ Command Center at (202) 514-5000. After being advised of the identity of the interviewing agent and the nature of the interview, Keyton provided the following information:
Keyton was working in Ted Olson's Office this morning. She is regularly called there to cover the telephones. At approximately 9:00am, she received a series of approximately six (6) to eight (8) collect telephone calls. Each of the calls was an automated collect call. There was a recording advising of the collect call and requesting she hold for an operator. A short time later another recording stated that all operators were busy, please hang up and try your call later.
Keyton then received a collect call from a live operator. The operator advised that there was an emergency collect call from Barbara Olsen for Ted Olsen. Keyton advised that she would accept the call. Barbara Olsen was put through and sounded hysterical. Barbara Olsen said, "Can you tell Ted.." Keyton cut her off and said, "I'll put him on the line."
There was a second telephone call a few to five (5) minutes later. This time Barbara Olsen was on the line when she answered. She called direct. It was not a collect call. Barbara Olsen said, "It's Barbara." Keyton said, "he's on the phone with the command center, I'll put you through."
Keyton advised that there is no caller identification feature on the phone she was using. Keyton didn't know if Barbara Olson was calling from the phone on the plane or from her cell phone.
So Lori Keyton is lying too?
Another impeccably unbiased, DVD-shifting source!yes thank you 8den. David Ray Griffin's revised article is here.
Could Barbara Olson Have Made Those Calls?
An Analysis of New Evidence about Onboard Phones.
But you're talking about his murdered wife. You're suggesting that he can't be trusted to tell the truth about his wife. Who was murdered.
Poor, poor people and their families, having their last desperate moments of utter horror picked over by internet obsessives for ever more.
Sickening. Stomach churning, in fact.
Like these ones? 230+ survivors and family members question 9/11
A short selection of quotes from that page:
etc
from the aces Discovery Future Weapons show...
First field deployment not until 2010 at the earliest according to global security.
So while they exist, they aren't in use, are easily affected by the weather, and can be defended against with a dustbin lid.
That's pretty fucking low. A conspiraloon website that hijacks the names of victims, and uses them out of context and without permission to further their own agenda. Disgusting. And upon closer examination, it seems that many of the names cited aren't even fundamentally questioning what happened.Like these ones? 230+ survivors and family members question 9/11
Yes. It's absolutely disgusting. Those fucking loons don't give a shit for the victims and never have.That's pretty fucking low. A conspiraloon website that hijacks the names of victims, and uses them out of context and without permission to further their own agenda. Disgusting. And upon closer examination, it seems that many of the names cited aren't even fundamentally questioning what happened.
"I'm not saying that they're deliberately trying to he deceive."
Obviously that doesn't prevent conspiraloons from misrepresenting grieving relatives of dead people.
So, not a single mention of holographic missiles, towers invisibly filled up with invisible explosives, faked phone calls or any of the other garbage you spew.A short selection of quotes from that page:
Like these ones? 230+ survivors and family members question 9/11
Yes. It's absolutely disgusting. Those fucking loons don't give a shit for the victims and never have.
Edna Cintron. Who died on 9/11. It's also got John O'Neil, head of WTC security, who also died in the WTC
Problem is, thinking you give a shit and actually giving a shit are two different things.This accusation is rolled out a lot, and it's a bit of a disingenous slur IMO.
That their actions could be offensive to the direct and indirect victims of 9/11 I wouldn't dispute for a second. But I think that the majority of these people genuinely believe the nonsense that they spout. From their perspective, they do what they do precisely because they do care about the victims.
I'm not even claiming that to be their primary motivation, but the claim that they 'don't give a shit for the victims' doesn't ring true for me.