Like these ones? 230+ survivors and family members question 9/11
dont you at least feel a tiny bit embarrassed
Like these ones? 230+ survivors and family members question 9/11
Problem is, thinking you give a shit and actually giving a shit are two different things.
I can say "I really hear what you're saying". I can believe that I'm hearing what you say. I can articulate the sentiment with all sincerity. But if I act in a way that completely ignores what you're saying, showing no regard for your feelings, and putting my personal agenda before your interests, then I obviously haven't really heard what you're saying, and I'm too dumb to understand the gulf that separates cheap words and real intent.How so?
You've essentially said that believing that you care about something and actually caring about something are different things. I'm not sure that make any sense whatsoever.
I can say "I really hear what you're saying". I can believe that I'm hearing what you say. I can articulate the sentiment with all sincerity. But if I act in a way that completely ignores what you're saying, showing no regard for your feelings, and putting my personal agenda before your interests, then I obviously haven't really heard what you're saying, and I'm too dumb to understand the gulf that separates cheap words and real intent.
I disagree. Not gonna waste a whole Sunday arguing about it though.That's not the same thing at all.
dont you at least feel a tiny bit embarrassed
Frank A.DeMartini:
He sadly died on 9/11. How can he question the events of 9/11? His statement, that the
twin towers were designed to withstand an impact of 707 are confirmed by Leslie E.
Robertson, who says the towers were designed to withstand an impact of a slow moving
airliner lost in a fog. DeMartini goes on to state, he believes that the building probably
could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners. Emphasis on the words believes and probably
Thhat's not the same thing at all. You're talking about a transaction, the communication of information. The point at hand concerns a sentiment, the experiencing of an emotion.
And the sentiment is incredibly distasteful, theres a little cottage industry of feckless idiotless flogging DVDs turning up at Ground Zero, accusing people of serious crimes on non existent evidence.
Badger Kitten may disagree with that.I'm not even claiming that to be their primary motivation, but the claim that they 'don't give a shit for the victims' doesn't ring true for me.
I disagree. Not gonna waste a whole Sunday arguing about it though.
Oh well, if you've said so, then I must be wrong. Thank you for sharing your wisdom with me.FWIW you're wrong.
Glad to be of help.Oh well, if you've said so, then I must be wrong. Thank you for sharing your wisdom with me.
Still haven't explained why I'm wrong though.Glad to be of help.
I have to everyone else. Maybe one day you might get it too.Still haven't explained why I'm wrong though.
Keep sucking that lollipop.I have to everyone else. Maybe one day you might get it too.
So thats three corpses in among your patriots at this count. All killed before they could get out of the towers. But nope they're listed as "patriots" questioning 911.
Being "unsatistfied with the state of the official narrative and investigation" is not the same thing by a godly mile as a belief that the government flew those jets into the towers and then blew them up for good measure.The fact remains that there are clearly numerous survivors and family members who are completely unsatistfied with the state of the official narrative and investigation.
The fact remains that there are clearly numerous survivors and family members who are completely unsatisfied with the state of the official narrative and investigation.
The fact remains that there are clearly numerous survivors and family members who are completely unsatisfied with the state of the official narrative and investigation.
Being 'dissatisfied' with the investigation DOES NOT add up to support for your lunatic theories about faked calls, holographic planes, talking terriers, invisible explosives and the rest of the evidence free garbage you post up here - and it is supremely dishonest and disrespectful to try and suggest that it does.The fact remains that there are clearly numerous survivors and family members who are completely unsatisfied with the state of the official narrative and investigation.
Distraction and diversion to avoid answering the actual question? Just a wild stab in the dark...Not one of those quotes supports your conspiracy claims about faked calls, so why did you post them here?
Olsen lost his wife and gets called a liar directly involved in a plot that killed thousands of people.
All of the above is totally irrelevant to Jazzz's claims, so I've no idea why you're posting it.Ahem, a bit of perspective might be in order here.
I basically accept the Bush/Cheney version of 9/11. And of course I'm sorry when anyone loses a loved one--Olson remarried less than a year later, which is good news for him.
But Ted Olson is a liar and a scumbag. And he has been directly involved in plots that have killed millions of people, not thousands. No-one should forget that, or forgive him.
so, he's the same as you only more of a scumbag?But Ted Olson is a liar and a scumbag.
But Ted Olson is a liar and a scumbag. And he has been directly involved in plots that have killed millions of people, not thousands. No-one should forget that, or forgive him.
GOT ANY EVIDENCE OF THIS? YOU WORTHLESS EXCUSE OF A FUCKING CUNT?
And spare me the, "oooh 8den is saying mean things" YOU'RE BASELESS ACCUSING SOMEONE OF MASS MURDER, you don't get any more obscene than that YOU FUCKING PRICKTARD ASSHOLE CUNT.
So show some evidence, OR SHUT THE FUCK UP.
8den's bottle must be almost empty again.
You don't know who Ted Olson is, do you?
he has been directly involved in plots that have killed millions of people, not thousands. No-one should forget that, or forgive him.
you don't argue at all, you spout shit to all and sundry.Sorry, but I don't argue with drunks.