That moment when you start watching after finally finding downloadable subtitles for the rare foreign language film you torrented years agoNumber 2 is just fantastic. "I am an actual flesh and blood man, get your hands off me you impersonator of a police constable!"
Soon followed by “ow, ow, ow, please stop hitting me”Number 2 is just fantastic. "I am an actual flesh and blood man, get your hands off me you impersonator of a police constable!"
Invisible cuntitude beams.I want to see how they ask to speak to the duty inspector without speaking to the police. Presumably through mime or dance?
In the heyday of Tommy Robinson and pound shop version era this was all very popular , asking police officers to remove their helmets and YouTube videos with loads of oddballs giving fake legal advice . As soon as followers started to appear in court they all ditched the maritime law stuff and all got normal solicitors . .I always wonder with these freeman types how many of them actually think it will stop them being arrested and / or being prosecuted. Of course there will be the die hards who are utterly convinced but it seems to have spread to such a stage now that its almost taken on another meaning.
What they are basically saying is an elaborate no comment with added defiance. It seems to me it is in itself a form a passive (mostly anyway) resistance. I wonder how much its more of an attitude of proud defiance then actual belief that citing some nonsense you saw someone else do on a YouTube vid means that you can't get arrested and prosecuted.
I always wonder with these freeman types how many of them actually think it will stop them being arrested and / or being prosecuted. Of course there will be the die hards who are utterly convinced but it seems to have spread to such a stage now that its almost taken on another meaning.
What they are basically saying is an elaborate no comment with added defiance. It seems to me it is in itself a form a passive (mostly anyway) resistance. I wonder how much its more of an attitude of proud defiance then actual belief that citing some nonsense you saw someone else do on a YouTube vid means that you can't get arrested and prosecuted.
Here's one in Bristol.
Covid-deniers gather as shop stays open after police visit
“You should be ashamed of yourselves”www.bristolpost.co.uk
A Bishopston tattoo artist is refusing to close his studio after a police visit – because he is “not a fictional character”.
Mr Walton joined the small band of Covid-deniers in holding the banner, chanting: “We do not consent.”
He then performed a dance in front of the Bristol Live photographer, waving his arms and hopping from one foot to the other.
Have a look at some videos on YouTube or similar. I think you may be being a tad over generous there...
A few months ago same guy made the Bristol news for refusing to either isolate or get tested following being on the same flight from Zante as a group of covid positive lads.
Not really. All I'm suggesting is that yes some people actually believe this bollocks but for others its just a rallying cry for defiance.
Sadly, a bit like flat earthers- who seem to overlap a bit - I think most genuinely believe in this bollocks.
I've been following this increasingly funny story with interest, and look forward to seeing the twunt in question trying to weasel themselves out of it
Covid-19: Bradford salon fined £17,000 for lockdown opening
Sinead Quinn opened Quinn Blakey Hairdressers in Oakenshaw in breach of government restrictions.www.bbc.co.uk
Yeh the point of a fine is that it's not voluntaryShe doesn't consent to the fines. She also doesn't understand that consent is not required to impose a fine.
Just had a look at the re-movement and werebank sites today. Can't comprehend how anyone would gobble any of this unless they were having mental health issues.
The sites are still up, but I think it probably had some paid for hosting going on the long term.Are they still about? I'm sure I remember longdog telling me a couple of years ago that the bloke who started the we-rebank had sodded off with the money he'd conned out of people.
I've been following this increasingly funny story with interest, and look forward to seeing the twunt in question trying to weasel themselves out of it
Covid-19: Bradford salon fined £17,000 for lockdown opening
Sinead Quinn opened Quinn Blakey Hairdressers in Oakenshaw in breach of government restrictions.www.bbc.co.uk
Correction 27 November 2020: In an earlier version of this report we said the salon had been fined £27,000 based on information from Kirklees Council which was later corrected.
The council said Quinn Blakey had been found to be open on Tuesday 24 November, but it later transpired there were no clients in the salon, so a £10,000 fine was not issued on that occasion.
Where do they get all this shit from? Wet signature, consent, do no understand/stand under. Is it just made up or does it have a root in reality?
Why are people so convinced it will get them out? A hair salon owner in Bradford has had her fine increased to £27K when the initial fine was £1K, all cos of this Magna Carta nonsenseIt's a mish-mash of some misunderstood and misapplied legal ideas, and some completely made up bollocks. Fundamentally, it's bonkers to think of the law as something you can get out of with some magical incantations; given the law is just the formalised exercise of power, why would those with that power allow such get-outs? Or, even more simply, it's bollocks because it doesn't work - these arguments always fail in court.
The article has had a correction: