A380
How do I change this 'custom title' thing then?
Can I have your watch?that's nothing, islam was made up by mohammed and everyone knows this
Can I have your watch?that's nothing, islam was made up by mohammed and everyone knows this
It's as useful to know as knowing if someone considers themself to be English rather than British, or whatever, so why the hell not?We don’t get the option until ‘22, but it’s worth the troll.
massive logic fail there.According to the state, (ONS), it does. If believers in Scientology thought it were not a religion they could tick the "No religion" box.
All of which, again, brings into focus the value of the question.
IrrelevantAccording to the state, (ONS), it does. If believers in Scientology thought it were not a religion they could tick the "No religion" box.
All of which, again, brings into focus the value of the question.
If they’re going to start ruling on what is and isn’t a “real” religion, they’re going to have to explain what the line is and why they chose it.Oh, I should have spent six seconds googling.
Jedi isn't a religion, the Charity Commission so ruled in 2016.
Jedi is not a religion, Charity Commission rules
Jedi, the worship of the mythology of Star Wars is not a religion, says the Charity Commission.www.bbc.co.uk
This is a thread about the census.Irrelevant
I've not claimed that the census question is logical.massive logic fail there.
They did.If they’re going to start ruling on what is and isn’t a “real” religion, they’re going to have to explain what the line is and why they chose it.
No, you claimed that because one government department includes space to write whatever you like to describe your religion, that means that the state accepts whatever is written there as a 'religion' in any other circumstance. It does not.I've not claimed that the census question is logical.
Oh ffs, do I have to read everything myself now? I thought this was Urban75!They did.
So?This is a thread about the census.
Its long and boring, or I'd precis for you. Essentially referred them to Arkell vs PressdramOh ffs, do I have to read everything myself now? I thought this was Urban75!
I've forgotten which church I'm ordained in, but it allows me to carry out weddings in 31 states (it claimed at the time)I am actually a member of the Church of the Latter Day Dude
Get Ordained for Free at the Religion of Dudeism
Get ordained for free at the world's most easygoing religion. Inspired by The Big Lebowski, Taoism, Zen and more.dudeism.com
They do certificates of ordination as well and you can become a Dudeist Priest.
I’m a minister in the Universal Life ChurchI've forgotten which church I'm ordained in, but it allows me to carry out weddings in 31 states (it claimed at the time)
snapI’m a minister in the Universal Life Church
But those ticking the "Other religion" box will figure in the state's (ONS) data.No, you claimed that because one government department includes space to write whatever you like to describe your religion, that means that the state accepts whatever is written there as a 'religion' in any other circumstance. It does not.
All it means is that sometime next year there will be a number of the amount of people who wrote 'jedi' on a form.
So, I'm struggling to see how you can cast a discussion about the definition of religion in the religion question in the census in a thread about the census as "irrelevant'.
Cos we were talking about whether Jedi was a religion or not. It isn’t. People can put it in a field on a survey form but doing that doesn’t make it a religionSo, I'm struggling to see how you can cast a discussion about the definition of religion in the religion question in the census in a thread about the census as "irrelevant'.
No, as I have already said twice, they give the exact number of people writing jedi and leave it up to whoever is using the data to do with it what they want. That's a beauty of the data, the interpretation is actually left to the user, it isn't determined by the state, or even by the ONS.But those ticking the "Other religion" box will figure in the state's (ONS) data.
I think you're getting a bit confused about what a religion is and what the Charity Commission considers a religion for the purpose of defining charitable tax status. For instance, Paganism is recorded under 'Other Religions' and yet the Pagan federation has not succeeded in attaining charitable status.
Did the ONS go back and disaggregate the 2011 Jedi data from the 'Other religion' category and add them to 'No religion'?
note the smilie - always a clear signCos we were talking about whether Jedi was a religion or not. It isn’t. People can put it in a field on a survey form but doing that doesn’t make it a religion
No, you're wrong about that. The discussion wasn't about the 'beauty' of how the data might be interpreted; it was just about whether or not the state statisticians include write-in religions under the 'Other religion' category.No, as I have already said twice, they give the exact number of people writing jedi and leave it up to whoever is using the data to do with it what they want. That's a beauty of the data, the interpretation is actually left to the user, it isn't determined by the state, or even by the ONS.
I note how you have changed the terms of your argument though.
The religion question was voluntary in the 2001 Census. Respondents were
given the opporunity to write in their religion in the 'any other
religion' box. All 'write in' religions would have been assigned to one
of the codes in the above file. Jedi was included so that it could be
autocoded rather than referred for manual intervention as there was a
campaign to encourage people to enter this on the form.
Maybe that's what you thought was being discussed. What I said was that the state statisticians included it in their 'Other religions' category.Cos we were talking about whether Jedi was a religion or not. It isn’t. People can put it in a field on a survey form but doing that doesn’t make it a religion
That doesn’t make it a religionMaybe that's what you thought was being discussed. What I said was that the state statisticians included it in their 'Other religions' category.
According to?That doesn’t make it a religion
Anyone with any senseAccording to?