brogdale
Coming to terms with late onset Anarchism
The films are real; they depict a fictional narrative.I’ve seen the films. They’re definitely made up.
The films are real; they depict a fictional narrative.I’ve seen the films. They’re definitely made up.
so what you're saying is nothing in those films are real. nothing. jedis, lasers, the ewoks, the notion of men and women, androids - none of it exists outside the star wars universe.I’ve seen the films. They’re definitely made up.
The films are real; they depict a fictional narrative.
so what you're saying is nothing in those films are real. nothing. jedis, lasers, the ewoks, the notion of men and women, androids - none of it exists outside the star wars universe.
Quite. So no one sincerely believes in it as a religion.The films are real; they depict a fictional narrative.
apparently - and unsurprisingly - you're wrong. ‘You have to face the darkness within you’: meet the real-life Jedi knightsQuite. So no one sincerely believes in it as a religion.
Again, who are you to peer into other people's souls and judge the sincerity of their supernatural beliefs?Quite. So no one sincerely believes in it as a religion.
We seem to be going round in circles. The Jedis and their belief were made up by George Lucas and its adherents know thisAgain, who are you to peer into other people's souls and judge the sincerity of their supernatural beliefs?
Whereas other religious belief systems were not 'made up'?We seem to be going round in circles. The Jedis and their belief were made up by George Lucas and its adherents know this
that's nothing, islam was made up by mohammed and everyone knows thisWe seem to be going round in circles. The Jedis and their belief were made up by George Lucas and its adherents know this
Of course but their faith is still realWhereas other religious belief systems were not 'made up'?
Again, such judgement.Of course but their faith is still real
NoScientology is based on a science fiction book. Is that also not a religion?
It is if people include it in their response to question 16 on the census, and the state will record it as such under the "Other religions" category.
Yeah but you don't have to believe that the Bible is the word of God to be a Christian. That's a very parvenu aspect.Hardly any Christians I know have any real hard belief in the Bible as the literal word of God, as evidenced by their ignoring of its doctrines (surely the last thing you’d do if you really believed it). They are just soft C of E types that like the community of it.
No, it’s a blank field so people can put down anything they wantIt is if people include it in their response to question 16 on the census, and the state will record it as such under the "Other religions" category.
I see. You should keep an annual register for the world to consult.
You’re probably supposed to if you are C of E or a Catholic thoughYeah but you don't have to believe that the Bible is the word of God to be a Christian. That's a very parvenu aspect.
apparently - and unsurprisingly - you're wrong. ‘You have to face the darkness within you’: meet the real-life Jedi knights
ThanksI see. You should keep an annual register for the world to consult.
Yes, in 2011 33.2 million people (59.3 per cent of the population) recorded their religion as Christian; it would be surprising if all of them believed that the Bible is the word of God.Yeah but you don't have to believe that the Bible is the word of God to be a Christian. That's a very parvenu aspect.
Scientology is based on a science fiction book. Is that also not a religion?
Mind you, so is Roman Catholicism and other churchesNo it is a fucking kleptocracy.
exactly; as opposed to those that actively choose the "No Religion" option; it is therefore officially recorded by the state as a religion and included within the "other religion" category.No, it’s a blank field so people can put down anything they want
Not Catholic. It was the Protestants who pushed the Bible as the sole authority, the Church of Rome depended more on the unbroken link with St Peter and thus Christ himself. Of course, the Protestants had no textual support for the Bible as the sole authority, because nowhere in the Bible does it say that it is itself the only authority.You’re probably supposed to if you are C of E or a Catholic though
“I’ma Christian but the Bible is a load of balls” is a tough sell.Not Catholic. It was the Protestants who pushed the Bible as the sole authority, the Church of Rome depended more on the unbroken link with St Peter and thus Christ himself. Of course, the Protestants had no textual support for the Bible as the sole authority, because nowhere in the Bible does it say that it is itself the only authority.
It's more of a Vision Statement than a Operating Plan though, isn't it? Let alone a procedural manual.“I’ma Christian but the Bible is a load of balls” is a tough sell.
Doesn’t mean it’s a religion.exactly; as opposed to those that actively choose the "No Religion" option; it is therefore officially recorded by the state as a religion and included within the "other religion" category.
According to the state, (ONS), it does. If believers in Scientology thought it were not a religion they could tick the "No religion" box.Doesn’t mean it’s a religion.