littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
Yeah fair enough. Some early cars were electric too!Not really without coal "petrol"stations you weren't going to go far...
Yeah fair enough. Some early cars were electric too!Not really without coal "petrol"stations you weren't going to go far...
It'll need a real alpha bully to go ..this is the route we're going downYeah fair enough. Some early cars were electric too!
I don't know if any of them have overcome the mining problem. Far as I know all the main ones use a similar formula. All of those will go - it's not a case of petrol vs coal vs electricity, it's all of them disappearing.It'll need a real alpha bully to go ..this is the route we're going down
Isn't car manufacturing more like the dotcom bubble - new technology that would go on to be huge, with loads of competitors, most of whom went to the wall, those that were left turning into giants.I get the point being made but a lot of the early car manufacturers, long before Standard Oil, did fine - Karl Benz etc.
it’s like the early days of the car and will need a Rockafeller to forge a standard....precisely what the early adopters don't want.
I stand to be proved wrong as blockchain technology enters all kinds of areas of life, but I can't get excited by its possibilities. I don't see it as transformative. Also, it's the only good idea in this mess. The rest of it is all terrible.Isn’t the whole crypto currency thing a bit like anarchy. In that there are some good ideas, but for it to work needs some sort of regulation, but that’s the one thing that they don’t want, so ultimately it’s an unworkable model.
Not exactly, because it took place long before globalisation, so there was a lot more room for each nation to have at least one manufacturer, even if not competitive overall, and a lot of those lasted indefinitely until mergers and acquisitions bundled them up into something else. Look at the history of contemporary car mfgs, Tesla aside, and most go back to late 1800s or early 1900s in some form. Of course, we don't remember the minnow losers, so it's a little skewed.Isn't car manufacturing more like the dotcom bubble - new technology that would go on to be huge, with loads of competitors, most of whom went to the wall, those that were left turning into giants.
This isn't even that, imo.
And in comparison to the dotcom boom, cryptoshit is just a con.Not exactly, because it took place long before globalisation, so there was a lot more room for each nation to have at least one manufacturer, even if not competitive overall, and a lot of those lasted indefinitely until mergers and acquisitions bundled them up into something else. Look at the history of contemporary car mfgs, Tesla aside, and most go back to late 1800s or early 1900s in some form. Of course, we don't remember the minnow losers, so it's a little skewed.
In comparison the dotcom boom was more straightforward free market gold rush with a very high number of casualties.
So were many dotcom propositions from an investment perspective - no point talking about theoretical use value if it never stacked up at all. OTOH, obviously some dotcom survivors make up internet fundamentals like eBay.And in comparison to the dotcom boom, cryptoshit is just a con.
that's over a year not 24hrs, sort your info outThis chart shows volume per 24 hours. Can't tell if that's number of btc changing hands or value in usd. If the former, then it is a massive explosion. If the latter, it's a more modest increase. Also, some of that will presumably be people buying in and cashing out immediately to make an exchange. Hard to make much sense of it, tbh.
I have seen other things saying that the vast majority of recent trading has taken place in China. Someone said earlier that the rise of btc may be partly attributable to Chinese money restrictions and Chinese capital seeking places to go. Hopefully that is mostly the case.
It shows 24 hr volume at the bottom, but I couldn't find info about whether that was volume by usd or by bitcoin numbers. If it's btc numbers, then Yossarian is right that there was a big influx of money towards the end of last year.that's over a year not 24hrs, sort your info out
The bar chart shows volume per 24 hours over that year.the graph is from 2 jan to 4 dec
and has 1yr selected at the top
You can explain exponential growth in price from linear growth in buyers. There are many bitcoin hoarders, so a steady increase in demand could lead to a rapid increase in scarcity.According to these its been a steady increase in users - seems peculiar given the rash of adverts that appeared towards the close of last year.
Number of Blockchain wallets 2017 | Statistic
Blockchain Wallet Users
Did you hear John Humphries this morning utterly failing to get with grips with it whilst being told by people with a vested interest in flogging cryptocurrencies that crypto was definitely the future of finance? Humphries was lapping it up and not challenging a single piece of their bullshit.As for all the ads, etc, there is an absurd amount of bullshit around about bitcoin.
So that's nearly half the punters out of pocket...10.4 million users @ Dec 16 -> 19.7 million users Dec 17
It hardly surprising there are more transactions...
Oh yeah, shit, sorry about that.The bar chart shows volume per 24 hours over that year.
It covers the period from 6 Dec 2016 to 6 Dec 2017
So that's nearly half the punters out of pocket...
I think this is where block chain will change thingsDid you hear John Humphries this morning utterly failing to get with grips with it whilst being told by people with a vested interest in flogging cryptocurrencies that crypto was definitely the future of finance? Humphries was lapping it up and not challenging a single piece of their bullshit.
True right now. But it is the nature of such a speculation bubble that it is a zero-sum game. Anyone who's made a profit has done so at the expense of those left holding the tokens at the end. In this case, it's even worse than that due to the mining costs, so the overall real-world wealth available to be shared out equals all the money used to buy bitcoin minus the mining costs.Current price is the same as it was mid November 17 - you would be out of pocket if you bought after that
And now October 29.Current price is the same as it was mid November 17 - you would be out of pocket if you bought after that
It will continue to bounce around, there is no 'it's gone bust' hard stop on the thing, but obviously the trend is significantly downwards. Two important things have happened: a lot of people will have been burned now, and the meteoric rise that it was sold on the back of is toast, so it makes it harder to market. Not completely, just iteratively so.
I wouldn't be surprised if there were further big rises but it doesn't change anything. Obviously no point trying to buy the dip either unless you have a very good handle on global consumer stupidity.
Not even that if its value is so unpredictable. Just use Monero or something (although that may ultimately be the same, haven't looked at it in detail)back to being the default currency of drugs , kiddie fiddlers and nazis then.