Thanks fridgie.
I don't like the woman, I've made that clear on more than one occasion. I think her behaviour in throwing about accusation was atrocious, it is highly damaging to any cause she is purporting to support and she does tend to attach herself to some of the causes I support. I've looked at why she might do that shitscattering (other than being a fucking idiot) in the way of looking at how women can respond to this level of threatening behaviour, certainly not to excuse it.
But saying she is a fucking idiot should not and ever be an excuse to justify the people attempting to silence her through threats of sexual violence. and I do wonder how much of her fuck witted overreactions to criticism are driven by the high level of abuse over a long period.I'd probably be more likely to assume disagreement was abuse if I was getting threats on a daily basis rather than only a small number. (only 4 this week, all within a few minutes of having something I said retweeted by Caroline) gawds only knows how much more crap someone with a 'profile' like Laurie gets.Not excuses, I'll say that again, but if she wasn't subjected to so much being told she needs to be fucked until she bleeds and that will turn her into a proper quiet woman who knows her place is on her knees or in the kitchen, then she might, just might be a little bit less of a fucking idiot.
I doubt it, but she is about the same amount of fucking idiot as someone who actually seems to be arguing that all feminism is and can be is represented by her ideals and that means women looking for equality need to be shut up cause it's all some kind of privilege seeking. hear that copliker? I think you're shit, just cause it's a different texture to laurries, doesn't make yours stink any less.
and my gut feeling is the abuse is added to for any woman who can also be attacked as an 'other' in another way. who may well have less ability to convince journos to support her than Caroline. who doesn't make a nice blond photo opportunity and give a nice well spoken radio interview. and probably has fewer resources to cope with the risks (like packing up and moving to a hotel for a week until you find the bastard that is posting your address online and trying to convince people to join him for a gang rape). That's not the whole story, it's far more complicated than that. but if we as feminists had to spend less time coping with constant threat, then we might have more time to work out how to deal with what should be the important issues, and stopping the othering of some of the most vulnerable women within some feminist circles.
What do I do - not a lot. I write some women's history, and I write a bit of feminist history. I support groups that don't fuck over the vulnerable even more, and tell those that do that they don't speak for me. What I won't do is set myself up as a leader and spokeswoman for the kind of feminism I believe in, cause I'm not Laurie fucking penny speaking for the poor and downtrodden masses. Highlighting online abuse might, just might make a small difference to whether those underrepresented women feel more able to speak for themselves. When more do, I'll hold their coats.