I'm getting nowhere with this. You're probably decent people individually, but together you behave like a pack of playground bullies, and your lack of empathy is shocking. I've tried in good faith to engage; you'd be hard-pressed to find another columnist who would- and I regret ever doing so.
You never "engaged" with those 3 questions I asked you months ago. You don't engage at all with this forum other than to collectively slander us all as racists, rape apologists, violent misogynists etc. We're decent people individually but you're not treating us like decent individuals, you're dealing with the place as a collective which in it's entirity engages in racism, rape apologism and a whole number of other unsubstantiated, behaviours. That's the only level you've ever tried to engage us on, slander and derision. "I work for a living" remember that?
If there's people on here who've been able to get away with rape apologism or racism then name their names and let's get it dealt with. I accept it's a bit of stalkery thread, it does turn you personally into a figurehead for much broader problems in the media, but it's
not a place where racism or sexual assault can be apologised for. If anyone's guilty of that and managed to get away with it please point it out to us so it can be stopped.
I would've liked to ask you about your public rush to defend Niall Ferguson after he got exposed as a homophobe. That's solidarity right there - he'll be able to take your apology and use it as his Get Out of Jail Free card the next time he drops his guard and blurts out something homophobic. There's loads of things I'd like to discuss. I don't care about your treatment as a teenager but I would haved like to see your opinions on this:
I think the interesting bit is how when a journalist so frequently self-references, or uses an anecdote or experience in a rhetorical way when writing articles, there comes with it an occupational hazard of saying things about yourself that in retrospect look pretty contradictory, such as the above two quotes sihhi. It's bound to happen if you try place yourself into every story you ever write. It also gets even trickier if someone wants to be able to change in and out of various guises to suit whichever audience they're talking to, because that'll mean details about yourself being slightly different for each audience. It's definitely not something that just Laurie Penny does either a lot of this goes on the comment pages of all the newspapers, I bet you could find these sorts of inconsistencies in loads of journo's if you look hard enough.
because that goes way beyond you personally. Any journalist over a long period of time who writes a lot of things will eventually leave a trail of contradictory statements behind them, which taken out of context can create this effect, but you're particularly bad for this, you go from "I'm an Anarchist" one minute to "vote Lib Dem" and "David Lammy is awesome" the next. I can understand how that might happen during a long 40 year career, how someone grows and changes, but you've only been around a few years, you're not much older than me. I think inconsistencies like that are part of the reason a lot of people view you as an insincere careerist hack.
Buy why bother? I didn't get a reply then, and I don't expect one now.