The response is pretty mind blowing tbh, I wonder if Hensher actually thinks what he's written there or is just going along with what seems to be the trend at hte moment of write shit article then claim that all the criticisms of it amounted to "I'm going to kill you by choking you to death with your own penis".
There were two bits in the article that particualry made me want to slap Hensher, and I was quite reasonable about his first article:
What led to trouble was that I did suggest that some assessment was necessary.
err.. has anyone who is opposed to ATOS/WCA actually said there should be no assessments? This is one of the most annoying myths perpetrated by those who support the ATOS/WCA process, making it out like we're mad and want there to be no tests and no ongoing support for disabled people ("warehousing").
The thing is that I do know about incapacity. I know how mental health can make it impossible to work. I also know that, in many cases, the incapacity retreats, with or without government benefits, and the full ability to work slowly returns. I have learnt that it is apparently unacceptable to say anything other than that illness is in every case indefinitely extended, and that no option other than a permanent retreat from work can ever be envisaged or discussed. I don’t believe it. It is not, necessarily, the mark of a “twat” or a “cunt” to suggest otherwise
Now in his original article he said this:
There are thousands off work with depression, even anxiety. In most cases, depression is incapacitating only for months, or even weeks.
Now I responded to this, by letting him know that I've been depressed for at least 23 years and that my severe depressive episodes during that time have lasted 2-4 years, and that this is pretty much the same for the people I closely know who also suffer from clinical depression. I've known a couple of bi-polar people too, and their depressive episodes have been shorter, maybe a few weeks to 6 months/1 year.. but then they've had the manic episodes too.
I don't think I really know anyone whose depressive episodes have only lasted for a few weeks tbh, though I wouldn't want to suggest that they don't exist.
It's madness to say that what I said was suggesting that illness in every case is indefinitely extended, but that his suggestion of weeks/months is out by an order of magnitude and that in my experience it is not most people who have shorter episodes, this is in fact unusual.
I've reached a point with my depression where my coping strategies are good enough that I could deal with regular work, though I've been lucky to be self-employed and able to vary hours when I've been in a depressive episode. I know how much harder that is when you've got fixed hours or no job at all.
When someone says most cases of depression are only incapacitating for a short time it adds to the stigma around it, it's an invisibile disability obviously and there's already enough people who think depression is just feeling unhappy, no idea what it really means, think it's easy to fake and that anyone who says they are depressed for a long time is just milking it/choosing to be depressed/not depressed any more but realising they can stay on esa.
It's total fucking bullshit that he can say what he says with no awareness of what it means and then claim he knows about incapacity, about mental health. If he did he would never have said those things, and if he was a halfway decent person he would have responded with understanding of why people had reacted against it.
Philip Hensher needs to check his sanity privilege