ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
I think that's totally unfair froggy.
You're only saying that because you don't 100% agree with her.
I think that's totally unfair froggy.
On who?
You're only saying that because you don't 100% agree with her.
Bit harsh.
They are pretty poor exemplars of human beings, let alone radical feminists.Don't let the strident middle class Burchills and Bindels talk for all of them.
yeah sorry, i know that website doesn't speak for everyone who calls themselves a radical feminist. its a disgrace that these people are appropriating the language of feminism to their own purposes.the idea that radfems just hate everyone on some hierarchical basis. I wouldn't call myself a radfem at all but i know plenty of women who do and they don't all hate men. Or straight women or transexuals. Don't let the strident middle class Burchills and Bindels talk for all of them.
they're only a minority of feminists, tbf
the idea that radfems just hate everyone on some hierarchical basis. I wouldn't call myself a radfem at all but i know plenty of women who do and they don't all hate men. Or straight women or transexuals. Don't let the strident middle class Burchills and Bindels talk for all of them.
Really sensitive men.What is the majority made up of?
the idea that radfems just hate everyone on some hierarchical basis. I wouldn't call myself a radfem at all but i know plenty of women who do and they don't all hate men. Or straight women or transexuals. Don't let the strident middle class Burchills and Bindels talk for all of them.
its a disgrace that these people are appropriating the language of feminism to their own purposes.
What is the majority made up of?
Really sensitive men.
I've got a radfem mate who won't countenance trans women in her feminist action groups and believes it's about sex, the specialness of women in childbearing and such. It starts and stops at Dworkin.
yeah sorry, i know that website doesn't speak for everyone who calls themselves a radical feminist. its a disgrace that these people are appropriating the language of feminism to their own purposes.
women who are simply concerned about equality of the sexes and so on i'd imagine, feminism is a pretty wide ranging thing and these people are only in a minority.
I can agree with that.
what about women who don't see themselves as feminists but who are concerned about equality of the sexes? I know quite a few like who don't want anything to do with what they see as feminism.
They may call themselves radical feminists, but radical feminists shouldn't.
It's 'radical feminism' because it gets to the root.
And like misogynists do, they'll excuse their misandry.
Not sure that those groups are safe for unaccompanied people of that age.
audiotech said:My ex was a radfem, as were most of her friends at the time. They all shared a house in a women's co-op. I was invited round for tea. That was a tester for a sole man I can tell you! Mary Wollestonecraft, Dworkin, Shiela Rowbotham, Egyptian feminists et al. I read widely on the subject. A number of co-op members, who defined themselves as lesbians, had men on the side. I kid you not. Did I read somewhere that Beyond the Fragments is being republished?
You've never actually read it have you?
Have you read it?Many years ago now.
Spare Rib monthly too.
Edit: Interesting article from Feminist Review (1980). The Long and Winding Roads (Reflections on Beyond the Fragments).
My ex was a radfem, as were most of her friends at the time. They all shared a house in a women's co-op. I was invited round for tea. That was a tester for a sole man I can tell you! Mary Wollestonecraft, Dworkin, Shiela Rowbotham, Egyptian feminists et al. I read widely on the subject. A number of co-op members, who defined themselves as lesbians, had men on the side. I kid you not. Did I read somewhere that Beyond the Fragments is being republished?