you mean flats for foreign billionaires surely?Then it could be made into a hotel for rich tourists.
we should immure all the politicians (i mean all the politicians, councillors - mps - meps - mlas etc etc ad nauseam) in the palace of westminster, and shoot everyone who tries to escape or to provide the inmates with food, drink etc.
What about the catering staff, cleaners and what have you?
'we' can't afford the nhs but there's 3bn in the pot to pimp their palace?
or cemeteries.Cut the number of MP's to 300 and people wouldn't notice the difference. I fail to see why they couldn't be housed in one of the many old disused town halls scattered around London.
they could find useful employment elsewhereWhat about the catering staff, cleaners and what have you?
'We' can't afford the NHS, yet can afford a foreign aid budget of more than £12Bn a year. Our citizens, who are in work, are in need of food banks, yet we have £12Bn to give away?
"Aid" isn't aid. It's an investment that realises a fairly decent return, because the states that receive the aid invariably purchase further goods and services from the donor nation. What this means (although some members of the political class appear to be too dim to realise) is that if you kick the aid budget in the arse, you actually rob the economy, with regard to jobs and production, of more than the aid budget has cost.
Move the MPs out to a new parliament located in Birmingham, do up the old Parliament and open it up to tourists. Rather see 3bn spent on something easily accessible to everyone.
We give aid to both India and Pakistan. Both of whom have standing armies the size of NATO, and are nuclear tipped. In need of aid, or in need of a better distribution of their resources?
Any nation which can afford nuclear weapons yet has masses of people in dire poverty is seriously fucked up, and needs to look at itself very critically.
Well, I don't necessarily agree with your general politics Sas, but I've always had this view. Any nation which can afford nuclear weapons yet has masses of people in dire poverty is seriously fucked up, and needs to look at itself very critically. But still, we do gain soft power from the aid, and hopefully help those people their own governments don't give a fuck about, so there are two sides to the coin, and I recall we are reducing aid to India over the next few years to nil (if memory serves).
'We' can't afford the NHS, yet can afford a foreign aid budget of more than £12Bn a year. Our citizens, who are in work, are in need of food banks, yet we have £12Bn to give away?
Move the MPs out to a new parliament located in Birmingham, do up the old Parliament and open it up to tourists. Rather see 3bn spent on something easily accessible to everyone.