Petition to request parliament review LTNs
- Thread starter ianarmstrong
- Start date
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Burger King UK & Ireland please bring back the Veggie Bean Burger
Can you spare a minute to help this campaign?
chng.it
maomao
普費斯
I've signed it but it won't be the same now they've changed the fries.Burger King UK & Ireland please bring back the Veggie Bean Burger
Can you spare a minute to help this campaign?
liquidindian
Hello
I'm allergic, what am I supposed to do? This is an appalling abuse of power and clearly a woke attempt to ban the whopper.Burger King UK & Ireland please bring back the Veggie Bean Burger
Can you spare a minute to help this campaign?
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
Sign it in solidarity. I can’t have them either because FODMAP.
The whopper is safe. It’s the bean burger that’s gone.
Artaxerxes
Look out, he's got a gnu!
If there’s a bring back beanfeast petition let’s roll.
liquidindian
Hello
Look, I'm a keen beaneater, I have beans on toast all the time. But this idea that we can live on beans alone is just the WEF controlling our burger chains. Look it up.
ash
Inittogether
Bloody vegans who want to eat things that look and taste like meat ruined the bean burger
danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
You want the truth? You can’t handle the truth. If you think you can, look at my strap line. Do your own research.
8ball
Decolonise colons!
It was surprisingly non-disgusting for its time.
hash tag
Books, not bombs
Be careful what you wish for
www.standard.co.uk
Tower Hamlets stripped of £1m funding amid pro-car agenda
A London borough whose mayor is pursuing a pro-car agenda has been stripped of more than £1 million in transport funding — and faces losing a similar amount next year.
www.standard.co.uk
Chilli.s
mingling jets and statuettes
Iv returned to my place after months working away and discovered that its now a sort of LTN.
The council seem to have implemented this on the cheap by putting up a few signs that say "no through traffic" or something but done nothing else
Its absolutely great, the steady flow of cars has been reduced to just a few. The air is cleaner, the noise is much less and the parking is better.
Be daft not to have one its a big improvement
The council seem to have implemented this on the cheap by putting up a few signs that say "no through traffic" or something but done nothing else
Its absolutely great, the steady flow of cars has been reduced to just a few. The air is cleaner, the noise is much less and the parking is better.
Be daft not to have one its a big improvement
muscovyduck
Good IT skills and food hygiene competent
lmao that bloke was a right knob
muscovyduck
Good IT skills and food hygiene competent
.
Last edited:
hash tag
Books, not bombs
A report earlier today
www.theguardian.com
And
www.theguardian.com
Years of breathing traffic pollution increases death rates, study finds
International review establishes strong connections between polluted air and mortality
And
A load of old bollards: Oxford LTN residents defend scheme after attacks
Residents in St Mary’s, home to ‘Britain’s most hated bollard’, say streets feel safer and more sociable without traffic
Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
Be careful what you wish for
Tower Hamlets stripped of £1m funding amid pro-car agenda
A London borough whose mayor is pursuing a pro-car agenda has been stripped of more than £1 million in transport funding — and faces losing a similar amount next year.
Khan is a totalitarian blackmailing bastard on this occasion.
Winot
I wholeheartedley agree with your viewpoint
An elected blackmailing bastard.
teuchter
je suis teuchter
This is just how transport funding works in London: TfL via the elected mayor has oversight of city-wide transport policy, and can allocate funding to boroughs which want to implement schemes that are in line with that policy.
It's up to Tower Hamlets: if they want some funding to implement schemes that are in line with TfL transport policy, they can have it. If they don't want it they don't want it.
It actually demonstrates that individual boroughs have some power to reject elements of TfL policy. Usually if you are subject to totalitarian rule you don't get to say "no thanks".
Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
Indeed. Not so keen on local democracy it would seem.
It is one of those situations where I agree with Khan re emissions, but also agree with Rahman (I didn't think I would ever be typing that)wrt to local democracy.
Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
The ability to say 'No thanks' is more than a tad pyrrhic if it leads to funds being withheld.
andysays
Love and solidarity
Why would boroughs which choose not to implement LTNs be given funds which are there to cover the costs of implementing LTNs?
This is a ridiculous position, even for you.
Sasaferrato
Super Refuser!
Because the money could be spent ameliorating traffic pollution, by partial implementation of a LTN.
Khan is an extremist, it isn't all or nothing.
liquidindian
Hello
Funds for the things that they've said "no thanks" to. If your mum was going to give money for school books and you said you were going to buy xbox games instead you can't complain if you don't get the money.
Winot
I wholeheartedley agree with your viewpoint
Rahman ran on an anti-LTN ticket and has been ripping them out at midnight to avoid local protests. It’s him that’s the extremist. He has no interest in a partial solution.
hash tag
Books, not bombs
Is the money give to Khan or is it given to each individual borough?
When the money is given out, what conditions have to be met.
I believe Oxford was one of the first places to implement LTN's and they have a fair few nor and there any many more around London
and the country generally. Is it not just the way of the world?
When the money is given out, what conditions have to be met.
I believe Oxford was one of the first places to implement LTN's and they have a fair few nor and there any many more around London
and the country generally. Is it not just the way of the world?
teuchter
je suis teuchter
Lots of boroughs have done "partial implementations".
Or, rather, there's no fixed definition of an LTN, it's more like a genre of traffic measures, and various london boroughs have done somewhat different implementations, some very much watered down.
So there doesn't seem to have been an "all or nothing" approach so far. The extremist is Rahman, who does indeed seem to want "nothing", something that is quite easy to match with zero funding.
I’m sure he’ll be back
maomao
普費斯
I bet if you replied to one of his posts he'd be straight back. He's got a petition to plug.
Similar threads
