that's right. so what. not voting does not change that one iota.
indeed. so what.And neither does voting.
indeed. so what.
i didn't do that because i was taking issue with your claim that millions of people's votes changed anything. and the majority of people who voted in 1979 didn't vote tory yet were saddled with a tory government. very democraticachieve... not much, it's one vote amongst millions and it matters only to me.
did you notice that when PM was quoting electoral numbers he mentioned the big 3 parties, but none of the minor ones, and gave no indication how many people didn't vote or spoilt their paper? Protest votes only matter if they potentially affect the outcome, non-votes don't matter at all.
achieve... not much, it's one vote amongst millions and it matters only to me.
did you notice that when PM was quoting electoral numbers he mentioned the big 3 parties, but none of the minor ones, and gave no indication how many people didn't vote or spoilt their paper? Protest votes are of academic interest if they potentially affect the outcome, non-votes don't matter at all.
no it's not.i didn't do that because i was taking issue with your claim that millions of people's votes changed anything. and the majority of people who voted in 1979 didn't vote tory yet were saddled with a tory government. very democratic
you don't sarcasm i seeno it's not.
you're on a roll todaySo your vote only matters to you, but in your second paragraph it matters to academics too.
simply making sure you're not labouring under any misapprehensions.you don't sarcasm i see
you're on a roll today
only when mixed in with all the other votes, not on its own.
floating and protest voters are of some interest all round before an election, afterwards they're ignored, except by academics. The hard headed view is that only winning votes matter, everything else is of no consequence, and therefor irrelevant.
you got me.So you're voting because you don't want to feel like you don't matter and are of little interest or consequence?
the votes of millions of people have some effect.
and what effect is that?
legitimising. what does that even mean?The effect of legitimising the whole charade of so-called democracy, obviously...
legitimising. what does that even mean?
nothing.
It matters not one whit to anyone except you whether you think this government, or this 'democracy', is legitimate or not.
oh, ok, I see. I doubt other people who've posted on this thread would see the process as legitimate, whether or not 'most people' do. Nor would I.I never said it did.
What I said was that millions of people choosing to participate in the process of elections has the effect of legitimising that process, at least as far as most people are concerned.
oh, ok, I see. I doubt other people who've posted on this thread would see the process as legitimate, whether or not 'most people' do. Nor would I.
So what meaning does it have that most people think the election process is legitmate? What's that the takehome message?
I'm not sure 'most people' do see the process as legitimate, btw. but if that's what the narrative that informs your personal decisions about voting is saying I'm happy to go along. It doesn't matter to me, to my narrative, one way or the other. Nor, I would hazard a guess, to 'most people' whether they choose to vote or not.
andysays and other anarchists on here, what is real democracy? Do you see people voting on everything, and how would that work? (We'd have the death penalty back again in short order.) Is it all local, and how does the local co-operate with other localities for greater good (eg taxation, health care, energy generation, regulation of medicines, policing, defence, higher education, waste disposal, international relations)? Where can I find Real Democracy 101?
There's a lot of pious nonsense when I Google so it would be good to have some informed direction.
course there is. first day for a while when I could laze about posting.I imagine you say all this with glee. You're secretly pleased that my non-voting means nothing and your protest voting means nothing also (apart from academically, maybe). There's no other explanation as to why you've been thumping this drum the entire day.
course there is. first day for a while when I could laze about posting.
andysays and other anarchists on here, what is real democracy? Do you see people voting on everything, and how would that work? (We'd have the death penalty back again in short order.) Is it all local, and how does the local co-operate with other localities for greater good (eg taxation, health care, energy generation, regulation of medicines, policing, defence, higher education, waste disposal, international relations)? Where can I find Real Democracy 101?
There's a lot of pious nonsense when I Google so it would be good to have some informed direction.
I'm not asking for a blueprint, just hoping someone can direct me to some serious thought on the subject.Whatever "real democracy" might mean depends on particular historical moments and the social movements they produce. You couldn't, even if it were desirable to do so, write a blueprint for what that would be.
25 million votes. what size ego would I need to think that my vote means something?I imagine you say all this with glee. You're secretly pleased that my non-voting means nothing and your protest voting means nothing also (apart from academically, maybe).