Every time I see that I think what a really shit name that isProud boys
...alternatively Trump's been incredibly good at it - utterly brazen - in a way perhaps any successor with any real party political power won't beI don’t disagree that it needs organising. In that sense we could reflect on the fact that we’ve been lucky that the figurehead of this phase has been so incompetent and self-obsessed
That doesnt narrow down the US pool of recruits muchThat guy to take one example was apparently a fundamentalist Christian before
The best named bunch has to be The Angry Vikings . (a real thing)Every time I see that I think what a really shit name that is
He didn't need to. The police generally support these demonstrators. They're always going to go a bit easier and give them more lattitude.The weak security is a bit of a puzzle. What are the odds that Trump intervened to make it that way, and consequently he'll be gone tomorrow?
Just idly wondering.
Female Trump supporter and military veteran shot dead in Capitol riots pictured
Ashli Babbit has been described as a devout Donald Trump supporter and had tweeted the "storm is here" prior to joining the riots at the US Capitol where she was killed amid the chaoswww.mirror.co.uk
Every time I see that I think what a really shit name that is
Or alternatively, how do you keep all those first-time voters who have just voted Democrat in Georgia and stop them from becoming disillusioned? How do you keep hold of the Sanders supporters who held their noses to vote for Biden to get rid of Trump?That's not what Smokeandsteam's arguing. The extreme right are not going to be won over, where the fight will be is what happens to the populist radical right. Is the answer anti-populist technocratic liberalism or is that part of the problem?
According to that, it wasn't just Twitter that banned him, but Facebook too.
I bet steam was coming out of his ears.
Oath Keepers
I suppose you could start to deal with Fox, social media and the rest - but at some point we have to acknowledge that a majority of the 70 million voted knowing what this was and would still vote for it.
I'm not sure in what way you care calling that an "alternative".Or alternatively, how do you keep all those first-time voters who have just voted Democrat in Georgia and stop them from becoming disillusioned? How do you keep hold of the Sanders supporters who held their noses to vote for Biden to get rid of Trump?
How? If you're talking about the evangelical churches, how do you get them onside when your policies need to include defending not just the right to abortion but the right to access to abortion, defending gay rights and trans rights, defending the teaching of evolution in schools?A huge issue was abortion. There were some good articles before the election about Trump courting the evangelical churches, and interviews with church leaders who had and had not changed their mind since 2016.
It may not sit comfortably from the perspective of the British left, but it’s probably a smart move for the Democrats to get churches onside.
It always sets off a sample of Duran Duran’s Wild Boys in my headEvery time I see that I think what a really shit name that is
Do you like the song?It always sets off a sample of Duran Duran’s Wild Boys in my head
I used toDo you like the song?
Do you like the song?
Last seen leaving furious one-star reviews on Google Maps I believe
How? If you're talking about the evangelical churches, how do you get them onside when your policies need to include defending not just the right to abortion but the right to access to abortion, defending gay rights and trans rights, defending the teaching of evolution in schools?
Yep. It's not even arguable that it isn't sedition under that definition.Quite interesting, the definition of sedition seems to comfortably cover yesterday's escapade, legal bods making noises about this.
View attachment 247535
From that Richard Seymour piece:More concerning is the apparent complicity/capitulation of the police. The fact these people largely seem to have been allowed to wander off home, and the vast and painfully obvious difference between that and the policing of black people engaged in genuinely peaceful protest, tells you all you need to know about whether ordinary americans should trust law enforcement.
It's an alternative way of framing the question. To focus on the 70 million and ask how you win them over is a strange way of framing it to me. The answer to the question is that you can't win most of those 70 million over. The more important question for Democrats is how do you keep the 80 million you have.I'm not sure in what way you care calling that an "alternative".
The populist radical right are a minority in the US, Western Europe, etc but they are a large minority. The strategy of the anti-populists, such as the Democratic Party's leadership, has been to put them on the naughty step, pretend they don't exist, argue that demographics will spell the end of them. The "decent" majority will ultimately win.
Yesterday's events show just how much a failure that strategy was/is. Sure populist radical right parties are going to lose more elections than they win, but that does not address their political power (unless you reduce politics to electoralism). Liberal anti-populism cannot "deal with" populism because populism is the result of liberal anti-populism.
Ah right, fair enough!0
I have a Florida flag, from the time I spent there, I'm certain this is the same. Although it wouldn't greatly surprise me if you are right.
Oh, and the formalities are finally done. All that's left is the swearing in.