i understand that one tased himself into a heart attack (seriously) and another was close to a flash-bang device and died of fright.
Not has any other senior goverment minister.
I dont disagree, but there is also the possibility that without Trump and no one to fill his boots adequately, the whole thing will fester and then shrivel. Trump has worked tirelessly to rile up this crowd - its a hard act to follow. A core group will remain of course, but its a question of will it continue to grow or not.
That's a cop, there were a few cops on the protestors' side of the door before the woman was shot from the other side and they tended to her immediately.
Video here:
The British burnt them down in response to the Americans burning the government buildings down in what became Canada. It was retaliatory, because no one holds a grudge like the British.Cory Booker tried to claim the British forces were following the flag of a cult leader as well, which was complete rubbish.
And, just to state the bleedin' obvous, in the very very unlikely event that Biden doesn't improve conditions, that's one of the reasons why it's so vital for there to be an outspoken left opposition to him from the start - to allow this lot to become the dominant face of discontent with the status quo and establishment would be a disaster.I agree with the second half of this. 70 million Americans voted for Trump. The core group is going nowhere as you say. The key question is does a Biden presidency push the mass Trump vote closer to the activist base or worse grow that number or does it isolate the nutters.
My answer is that unless Biden is radical in terms of addressing inequality, is seen to stand up against elite interests and most importantly begins to invest in jobs and healthcare the former is entirely likely.
His spokesperson tweeted it. All news comes from Twitter now.How do you know then?
Well we know the answer to that. Of course he's not going to be radical.My answer is that unless Biden is radical in terms of addressing inequality, is seen to stand up against elite interests and most importantly begins to invest in jobs and healthcare the former is entirely likely.
That's a cop, there were a few cops on the protestors' side of the door before the woman was shot from the other side and they tended to her immediately.
Video here:
And, just to state the bleedin' obvous, in the very very unlikely event that Biden doesn't improve conditions, that's one of the reasons why it's so vital for there to be an outspoken left opposition to him from the start - to allow this lot to become the dominant face of discontent with the status quo and establishment would be a disaster.
only way to do that is 25th amendment.So anyhow, this is why there is a vice president, if the president goes out of control the vice president is expected to take over, no?
Well we know the answer to that. Of course he's not going to be radical.
That doesn't necessarily mean the far right will maintain momentum. Its not just a reactionary force, it needs driving IMO
this isn't true really is it - did you miss the summer of riots against the status quo or something?The lesson a lot of Americans will be drawing from the last 24 hours is that if you are sick to death of the status quo - and want to fight it - that there is only one side fighting.
I am not convinced that the people you're talking about (hardcore red hats and fascists and Qanon believers) are going to go away if there's improvements to healthcare and reduced inequality, those things sound like socialism.
Yeah, I don't think it'll be easy to win those people over either, I'm more thinking about, to borrow a handy phrase, "draining the swamp" that these people draw potential recruits from - you don't just wake up one day and decide "today I will don a fur cloak and storm DC", that's the end result of a process, and you have to hope it's possible to interrupt that process in its earlier stages.I am not convinced that the people you're talking about (hardcore red hats and fascists and Qanon believers) are going to go away if there's improvements to healthcare and reduced inequality, those things sound like socialism.
Fair enough. But a lot of those 70 million who voted Republican are not remotely interested in reducing inequality or in changing the status quo tho, people like my cousin who just want tax to stay low and don’t mind a bit of racism to maintain their place in the hierarchy etc.I said the opposite of that. They are indeed going nowhere. I’m talking about the 70 million voters who aren’t that
That's not what Smokeandsteam's arguing. The extreme right are not going to be won over, where the fight will be is what happens to the populist radical right. Is the answer anti-populist technocratic liberalism or is that part of the problem?I am not convinced that the people you're talking about (hardcore red hats and fascists and Qanon believers) are going to go away if there's improvements to healthcare and reduced inequality, those things sound like socialism.
I said the opposite of that. They are indeed going nowhere. I’m talking about the 70 million voters who aren’t that
Hmmm. Thing is that Trump was a very typically Republican president in most of what he did - tax cuts for the rich, deregulation, environmental vandalism, etc. And most Republican voters are still the traditional Republican voters - in the Georgia runoff yesterday, the Republicans won big among those earning $75k and more, like they usually do. When talking about the 70 million who voted for Trump, this needs to be borne in mind. A big number of that 70 million want the status quo, and for them Trump was the status quo.Is is stating the obvious? Having pored over social media ‘analysis’ this morning I don’t think your point can be made enough to be blunt.
The lesson a lot of Americans will be drawing from the last 24 hours is that if you are sick to death of the status quo - and want to fight it - that there is only one side fighting. That has to change. If the left and Biden become perceived as synonymous or in lock step the consequences are obvious
That guy to take one example was apparently a fundamentalist Christian before he discovered qanon and trump some 5 years ago and has been doing His Own Research on the Internet since. So yep, it takes a while to end up where he is. I have no idea what the answer is tbh because radicalisation is basically how YouTube & social media works, it’s the business model.Yeah, I don't think it'll be easy to win those people over either, I'm more thinking about, to borrow a handy phrase, "draining the swamp" that these people draw potential recruits from - you don't just wake up one day and decide "today I will don a fur cloak and storm DC", that's the end result of a process, and you have to hope it's possible to interrupt that process in its earlier stages.
RepublicansSomeone help me out quickly please. I've had a brain fade. Name a few US right wing weirdo groups besides QAnon.