the whole thing? why in gods name?I watched this rubbish last night. They all need to fuck off. Especially Toynbee.
he is a through and through torybot. The sort who'd worsen conditions in a jail then welcome the subsequent rioting cos he gets to look tough crushing them with some bull necked tornado-trained special screw squadJust seen the guardian say gove is a fine choice as the justice secretary. Wtf
he is a through and through torybot. The sort who'd worsen conditions in a jail then welcome the subsequent rioting cos he gets to look tough crushing them with some bull necked tornado-trained special screw squad
“Were I ever alone in the dock I would not want to be arraigned before our flawed tribunals, knowing my freedom could be forfeit as a result of political pressures. I would prefer a fair trial, under the shadow of the noose.”
I would prefer a fair trial, under the shadow of the noose.
I'd be happier with a show trial- someone of his class and reach would get an easy ride from bourgois justice
He was massively successful in pushing through their agenda in education. You underestimate him.Gove is unique - indeed placing him in charge of repealing the Human Rights Act is probably the best guarantee of retaining and extending it that there is.
With drink involved, it was strangely compulsive.the whole thing? why in gods name?
ive become temptedWith drink involved, it was strangely compulsive.
He was relieved of that post after bringing down the wrath of the teaching profession on his head.He was massively successful in pushing through their agenda in education. You underestimate him.
He was massively successful in pushing through their agenda in education. You underestimate him.
He was relieved of that post after bringing down the wrath of the teaching profession on his head.
And only yesterday the Mail were reporting it as fact
She was educated at some of Britain's finest academic institutions where she was taught about the sacrifices of the wartime generation. Her grandmother was even awarded the George Cross for her services in the Second World War.
Despite this, Left-wing writer Laurie Penny defended the vandal who sprayed 'F*** Tory Scum' in red paint on a memorial honouring the women who served in the war.
Hours later Miss Penny, 28, who was privately educated at Brighton College before studying English at Oxford, wrote on Twitter: 'I don't have a problem with this. The bravery of past generations does not oblige us to be cowed today.
'What's disgusting is that some people are more worried about a war memorial than the destruction of the welfare state.'
Miss Penny, who writes for The Guardian, later admitted that she 'should have been more sensitive, especially given the day'. But she added defiantly: 'I meant what I said' and claimed: 'I honour [my grandmother] by staying angry.'
Last night Miss Penny said: 'I really didn't mean to insult anyone, much less advocate vandalising public monuments. What I'm saying is that I understand the anger behind it.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...b-plotting-summer-thuggery.html#ixzz3ZurKrRfA
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
And only yesterday the Mail were reporting it as fact
"Poster girl for the Left". PersonalBrand++. It's a nothing story about her getting mixed up. But this sort of nonsense suggests that if there are regular boisterous anti-tory protests, they'll go after people, pick them from the crowd, dig up what they can and generally make life a bit shitty.
"Poster girl for the Left". PersonalBrand++. It's a nothing story about her getting mixed up. But this sort of nonsense suggests that if there are regular boisterous anti-tory protests, they'll go after people, pick them from the crowd, dig up what they can and generally make life a bit shitty.
Nope.politics of hope vs politics of despair
Manarchist, dudebro …. These are terms that are typically employed as a cudgel against the left by centrist Democrats. They argue for dismissing a particular political argument by presuming that a certain set of people makes that political argument. Which, whatever: a majority of the socialists I’ve known in my life have not been white men, and I’ve known thousands, but who cares, right. The bigger question at this point is what any of that has to do with a guy using Emmett Till’s memory to wage political warfare over a trade agreement. What does manarchism or brocialism or whatever have to do with that ugly comment? Who knows? It doesn’t matter: Bauer knows that those are magic words. He understands how today’s progressive internet works. He understands critique drift. He knows that whatever complaints about him can simply be filtered through third-hand appropriated feminism. Because that’s how we do things, now.
What all of this descended into, as was inevitable, was a White Off. A White Off is a peculiar 21st-century phenomenon where white progressives try to prove that the other white progressives they’re arguing with are The Real Whites. It’s a contest in shamelessness: who can be more brazen in reducing race to a pure argumentative cudgel? Who feels less guilt about using the fight against racism as a way to elevate oneself in a social hierarchy? Which white person will be the first to pull out “white” as a pejorative in a way that demonstrates the toothlessness of the concept? Within progressivism today, there is an absolute lack of shame or self-criticism about reducing racial discourse to a matter of straightforward personal branding and social signaling. It turns my stomach.
2 booj 2 fail. Suck it up losers.Thanks, everyone. It's been a nasty few days but I have tea and books and good friends and ultimately, no power in the 'verse can stop me.
The Lib Dems are now tending to the fallen, with defeated candidates getting calls from the top brass. They plan to rebuild, as they have before, from the local level and draw hope from the way in which 10,000 masochists have joined the party since the election. But they are doubly sad, mourning both their annihilation and what that means for Britain. As one says: “There’s no satisfaction in watching the working poor being penalised to prove us right.
Quite.Where the fuck is this narrative coming from that somehow the Lib Dems were a moderating influence on the Tory-Lib Dem assault on the poor? They backed the welfare persecutions, persecution of the disabled, universal credit, free schools, further privatisation of the NHS and contributed to and supported the scrounger rhetoric which has led to an atmosphere in which thousands have died. Yet now they want to act as if they were against all of this and idiots like Helen Lewis fall for it, probably because they are so far removed fro any of this and so rich they are probably in the small minority that actually benefit financially from the Tories.
There are many other items on the agenda that the Lib Dems would have blocked: draconian anti-terror powers, hacking lumps out of the BBC, reviving the “snooper’s charter” and the £12bn of benefit cuts.