8ball
Decolonise colons!
This, really. The problem is though that it will always be very easy for them to do it.
There's the option of calling bullshit on it, I guess.
This, really. The problem is though that it will always be very easy for them to do it.
There's the option of calling bullshit on it, I guess.
Reactionaries really have cottoned on to this nonsense in recent years which is why you have Blairite students successfully using it to outmanoeuvre left-wing students in the NUS, Lib Dem councillors accusing Syriza of racism (and this being taken seriously by groups like London Black Revolutionaries) and the appropriation of intersectionalist language by MRAs and Gamergaters. They can do this because this 'politics' is so utterly devoid of content and a theoretical basis but at the same time is treated seriously by a vocal minority, people said for years that the right would do it and they have.
Oh I see, thought you were talking about the commentariat. You're right, except I'm not convinced over the effectiveness of laws in making things safer. I know some organisation's keep 'dodgy punter lists' and there's (or was) a website for sex workers to warn each other about dangerous men. Same names or descriptions would come up time and time again. These are the kinds of things I see as being more useful at dealing with the realities of sex work.you're quite right - the 'they' in my statement were the people who attempt to no platform her. greer understands the class analysis of sex-work and puts it into its correct context. i also meant that for every middle class escort who has "chosen freely" to go into sex work and finds it releatively safe and profitable, there are half a dozen working class women who are chosing between sex work and starvation, or sex work and violence, who work in unsafe situations for little or no profit. their choices are not free - nor are those women who are pimped out, etc etc. enshrining into law the freedoms of the middle classes is to enshrine into law the abuse of the lower classes, IYSWIM.
Germaine Greer also mentions that, and the high cost of surgery, in her book that first caused all this outrage.It's also worth mentioning that one of the biggest issues that trans women face is actually economic coercion into sex work and 'transsexual porn' due to prejudice and lack of other options. Don't see the twittersectionalists going on about that tho. I saw a tweet today saying that using the term 'fgm' is actually transphobic
I came across this recently during a discussion about periods on a feminist site. Basically, a neo-liberal equality feminist was having a go at a doctor in the UK who was calling for the option of paid 'period leave'; saying it was a ridiculous idea to allow women to miss 'valuable days off work for something so minor as periods'. Lots of women started having a go back at her, which led to what I thought was an important discussion about the impact of periods on our lives. But there was this small group who kept repeating stuff like, 'I'm a man who has periods' or 'I'm a women that doesn't have periods' so everyone should say people who have periods'. Some were calling anyone who'd used the word women transphobic; others were politely asking us to be more considerate, but it was an irritating distraction. Also helped me see how this kind of thing can be about more than policing language. It can end up with self-important side issues overtaking and ultimately, holding-back any kind of progress.That's the same kind of people who think any kind of discussion about periods or endometriosis or any of the other things that genuinely do only affect women born women is transphobic. They can fuck off. I have no tolerance for that sort of nonsense whatsoever.
That's a really good example of side issues being used as excuses to deny employment rights and worsen working conditions.There was a case in the US recently where a woman who claimed sex discrimination because of not being allowed to breastfeed had her case thrown out because 'men can also lactate'
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6653418
True, but of course that is usually an option when someone comes out with intersectionalisms.
I came across this recently during a discussion about periods on a feminist site. Basically, a neo-liberal equality feminist was having a go at a doctor in the UK who was calling for the option of paid 'period leave'; saying it was a ridiculous idea to allow women to miss 'valuable days off work for something so minor as periods'. Lots of women started having a go back at her, which led to what I thought was an important discussion about the impact of periods on our lives. But there was this small group who kept repeating stuff like, 'I'm a man who has periods' or 'I'm a women that doesn't have periods' so everyone should say people who have periods'. Some were calling anyone who'd used the word women transphobic; others were politely asking us to be more considerate, but it was an irritating distraction. Also helped me see how this kind of thing can be about more than policing language. It can end up with self-important side issues overtaking and ultimately, holding-back any kind of progress.
Surely the solution should be that people should be allowed to breastfeed their infant or make allowances for the impact of periods, regardless of whether the person in question is (or self-identifies) as female or not?
Or is that too sensible?
Don't those kind of people ever get sick or injured?
and they experience events that are genuinely unplanned disasters. everyone else is being irresponsible and expecting other people to cover for themYou just don't understand - only when they/their friends get sick they are actually sick whereas everyone else is just lying to get out of feeling as miserable as they do.
fourby owners who heroically make forth when even the man on the news said 'don't travel' making everyone else look like cunts. No matter that every two out of ten of you cunts cause the biggest headache for the fire bods when they fish your entitled arse out of the river eh. YOU TRIED TO GET TO WORK AND MAKE THE MAN MORE MONEYAlso fuck the people who come into work sick and make everyone else ill, do no work, stay sick for ages and brag about how they come into work sick while "pussies" take the time off to get better.
it is. but there's an unfortunate number of people who consider that anyhting offered to any group that is compensatory for any form of disability/problem/illness/need/etc is a direct attack on everyone else.
It's a sign of how the capitalist culture machine has been so incredibly successful - like when people who've never been ill complain about socialised health care.
It's a sign of how the capitalist culture machine has been so incredibly successful - like when people who've never been ill complain about socialised health care.
There are no adults who have never been ill, and certainly none who have never had an ill family member.
There are no adults who have never been ill, and certainly none who have never had an ill family member.
Certainly the latter, yes. Though there are plenty where the illnesses are not expensive ones of the kind that can utterly wipe out the finances of even quite well off people, so they resent those people where a lot of money gets spent.
I'm starting to have less and less sympathy tbh. There's a really nasty misogynistic streak in a lot of trans politics and these activists are calling literally anyone who disagrees with them a terf. Some of the stuff they come out with is incredibly fucked up, and i mean this group rather than trans people in general before anyone starts.