newbie
undisambiguated
a proposition was put forward, it's been batted back and forth, assertion and counterassertion made, and the bones picked over. If you believe the entire discussion stands or falls on the 'facts' of a specific 'objective' test based on that article then go ahead and prove it to your own satisfaction. Anyone else wishing to do so can read the same article, reach their own conclusions.
That really doesn't require my input. It's not my vocabulary or my comprehension that's at issue here yet the proposed test relies on me suggesting that some particular word or phrase is problematic, so providing another opportunity for people (many for whom wordsmithery is stock in trade) to say we know what that means, it's simple, you must be stupid. Hiding to nothing sfaics.
That really doesn't require my input. It's not my vocabulary or my comprehension that's at issue here yet the proposed test relies on me suggesting that some particular word or phrase is problematic, so providing another opportunity for people (many for whom wordsmithery is stock in trade) to say we know what that means, it's simple, you must be stupid. Hiding to nothing sfaics.