Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-25

Good article in the lrb:

Thought this bit was interesting.
But it has struggled to turn the ingenuity of its engineers and designers – Ukraine was a centre of drone innovation even before the invasion – into mass production, not least because nowhere in Ukraine is out of Russian missile range, and any developing arms factory becomes a target for attack.
Recently Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine’s young ‘digital transformation’ minister, has promoted a project by a non-profit foundation that aims to teach Ukrainians to assemble small kamikaze ‘FPV’ drones – modified hobbyist quadcopters carrying makeshift explosive payloads – at home. ‘Do you want to build an FPV drone with your own hands that will burn a Russian tank?’ the project website asks. ‘Then this opportunity is for you!’
Government enthusiasm for a cottage kamikaze drone industry (the foundation, it should be noted, doesn’t ask amateur constructors to add the explosives themselves in their kitchens) is a sign of how dependent the Ukrainian army has become on using FPV drones to fight off Russian armoured attacks in the absence of a regular supply of shells for its big guns.
And at the end
but they would have to tackle the problem that the war the Ukrainians and Russians are fighting is not the war Nato is used to training for; the sheer density of drones over the battlefield is new for everyone.
The Russian military journalist Alexander Kharchenko, who argues that Russian use of FPV drones was one of the causes of the failure of the Ukrainian counter offensive, suggested in January that the battle lines were more fluid than generally thought. ‘The number of drones at the front is growing exponentially,’ he wrote on Telegram.
‘Dozens of “birdies” [drones] will fly at a single armoured vehicle, and a soldier can be chased by two or three.’ Front-line trenches, he pointed out, were held at the expense of troops and vehicles ready to supply them with food and ammunition and evacuate the wounded.
If that supply chain couldn’t make it the last mile to the trenches, the trenches would fall. ‘The recipe for a breakthrough is extremely simple,’ he wrote. ‘Quadruple the number of FPV drones and concentrate them on a small section of the front.
After supplies fail, you’ll be able to weed out the exhausted [survivors] without much difficulty. Crucially, this scenario can be carried through with only a small investment of time and money. It’s realistic. The main thing is to stay ahead of the enemy.’
 
interesting article...lots in it but a couple of bits that stand out: "Russia has at least a three-to-one superiority in artillery fire, and often even more", but perhaps most interestingly the war economy is creating a wider boom of sorts

“The war has led to an unprecedented redistribution of wealth, with the poorer classes profiting from government spending on the military-industrial complex,” said Denis Volkov, the director of the Levada Center, a polling and sociological research firm in Moscow. “Workers at military factories and families of soldiers fighting in Ukraine suddenly have much more money to spend. Their income has increased dramatically.”

Levada’s polling showed that 5-6% of those who “previously did not have enough money to buy consumer goods like a fridge now have moved upwards towards the middle classes”.

---arms production extra fuelled by forced labour and compulsory overtime

... a war economy will be hard to wean off, every chance of more war for economic reasons
 
Last edited:
interesting article...lots in it but a couple of bits that stand out: "Russia has at least a three-to-one superiority in artillery fire, and often even more", but perhaps most interestingly the war economy is creating a wider boom of sorts

“The war has led to an unprecedented redistribution of wealth, with the poorer classes profiting from government spending on the military-industrial complex,” said Denis Volkov, the director of the Levada Center, a polling and sociological research firm in Moscow. “Workers at military factories and families of soldiers fighting in Ukraine suddenly have much more money to spend. Their income has increased dramatically.”

Levada’s polling showed that 5-6% of those who “previously did not have enough money to buy consumer goods like a fridge now have moved upwards towards the middle classes”.

---arms production extra fuelled by forced labour and compulsory overtime

... a war economy will be hard to wean off, every chance of more war for economic reasons
Back to that permanent war economy. Deal with the capitalist problem of overproduction, that drags everything down in the end, by just blowing the shit up.

Its a shame no one ever pushes a permanent health economy
 
Last edited:
interesting article...lots in it but a couple of bits that stand out: "Russia has at least a three-to-one superiority in artillery fire, and often even more", but perhaps most interestingly the war economy is creating a wider boom of sorts

“The war has led to an unprecedented redistribution of wealth, with the poorer classes profiting from government spending on the military-industrial complex,” said Denis Volkov, the director of the Levada Center, a polling and sociological research firm in Moscow. “Workers at military factories and families of soldiers fighting in Ukraine suddenly have much more money to spend. Their income has increased dramatically.”

Levada’s polling showed that 5-6% of those who “previously did not have enough money to buy consumer goods like a fridge now have moved upwards towards the middle classes”.

---arms production extra fuelled by forced labour and compulsory overtime

... a war economy will be hard to wean off, every chance of more war for economic reasons


Huge victory for the working class, I can see why some are pro Putin now
 
interesting article...lots in it but a couple of bits that stand out: "Russia has at least a three-to-one superiority in artillery fire, and often even more", but perhaps most interestingly the war economy is creating a wider boom of sorts

“The war has led to an unprecedented redistribution of wealth, with the poorer classes profiting from government spending on the military-industrial complex,” said Denis Volkov, the director of the Levada Center, a polling and sociological research firm in Moscow. “Workers at military factories and families of soldiers fighting in Ukraine suddenly have much more money to spend. Their income has increased dramatically.”

Levada’s polling showed that 5-6% of those who “previously did not have enough money to buy consumer goods like a fridge now have moved upwards towards the middle classes”.

---arms production extra fuelled by forced labour and compulsory overtime

... a war economy will be hard to wean off, every chance of more war for economic reasons

There have been a few articles over the last year that have pushed this military Keynesian theory, Volodymyr Ishchenko , a Ukrainian sociologist one of the first and it followed on from his initial articles of who in Russia benefits from the war.

He also has a book out end of this month 'Towards the Abyss: Ukraine from Maidan to War'



 
There have been a few articles over the last year that have pushed this military Keynesian theory, Volodymyr Ishchenko , a Ukrainian sociologist one of the first and it followed on from his initial articles of who in Russia benefits from the war.

He also has a book out end of this month 'Towards the Abyss: Ukraine from Maidan to War'



Not noticed Ishchenko before, but that Al Jazeera is particularly good. Possibly the best succinct analysis I've seen in a mainstream media outlet.
 
Yes interesting article the Al Jaz one, and from 16 months ago seems particularly good foresight:

"Russian military Keynesianism contrasts sharply with the Ukrainian government’s decision to stick to neoliberal dogmas of privatisation, lowering taxes and extreme labour deregulation, despite the objective imperatives of the war economy. Some top-notch Western economists have even recommended to Ukraine policies that constitute what British historian Adam Tooze has termed “warfare without the state”.

In a long war of attrition, such policies leave Ukraine even more dependent not only on Western weapons but also on the steady flow of Western money to sustain the Ukrainian economy. Making oneself fundamentally dependent on Western support may be not a safe bet, especially if your adversary is in it for the long haul."

Ukrainian neoliberalism not a random occurrence within this war...
 
Last edited:
The other economic aspect here as well as the already mentioned Russian building in occupied territories is also of course land and mineral gains... And likewise the inverse loss for the Ukrainian state
 
Ukraine can’t increase state capacity much because Russia keep blowing bits of it up and damaging the grid


Though if it’s a choice between a school and a drone factory I’m sure Russia would go for the school
 
Ukraine can’t increase state capacity much because Russia keep blowing bits of it up and damaging the grid


Though if it’s a choice between a school and a drone factory I’m sure Russia would go for the school
probably thinking that as they use skoolkids to assemble drones, that's what ukraine will be doing, so in that example striking the school would be a win-win for them.
/cynic
 
BBC covering what appears to be the death in prison of Alexei Navalny, the opposition politician & vociferous critic of the Kremlin & putin.


There's no doubt he was politically persecuted by the Russian regime. However, when you say he was a vociferous critic he was a vociferous critic often from the right. He was expelled from the Yabloko party for his nationalist views. He once made a video comparing Russian Muslims as cockroaches where he shot one with a gun.
 
There's no doubt he was politically persecuted by the Russian regime. However, when you say he was a vociferous critic he was a vociferous critic often from the right. He was expelled from the Yabloko party for his nationalist views. He once made a video comparing Russian Muslims as cockroaches where he shot one with a gun.
shot a cockroach or shot a muslim?
 

Ukrainian troops withdraw from Avdiivka.

Seems to relate to the above discussion of Russia's war economy.

It is also worth noting that Russia is receiving a great deal of equipment from China:



It is odd how the apologists for Putin swing wildly between saying his victory is inevitable so we should stop helping Ukraine, to saying how Russia is too weak to threaten anywhere else. Clearly, a Russian economy dedicated towards military production backed by massive Chinese industrial capacity is a serious threat to Europe beyond Ukraine, especially given their alt-right disinformation networks and possible alliance with MAGA - also why it is missing the wood for the trees to focus on Ukraine's far right. The weakness of Russia is real but is also why it is a threat in the short to medium term - both Russia and China face long term relative decline due to their demographic issues, which is why there is a determination to reshape the world order to lock in some form of hegemony while they still can. This isn't something that will blow over anytime soon.
 
"What's in that warehouse Švejk?"

"Nothing Captain."

* Captain looks in warehouse *

"FFS Švejk!"

 

Ukrainian troops withdraw from Avdiivka.

Seems to relate to the above discussion of Russia's war economy.

It is also worth noting that Russia is receiving a great deal of equipment from China:



It is odd how the apologists for Putin swing wildly between saying his victory is inevitable so we should stop helping Ukraine, to saying how Russia is too weak to threaten anywhere else. Clearly, a Russian economy dedicated towards military production backed by massive Chinese industrial capacity is a serious threat to Europe beyond Ukraine, especially given their alt-right disinformation networks and possible alliance with MAGA - also why it is missing the wood for the trees to focus on Ukraine's far right. The weakness of Russia is real but is also why it is a threat in the short to medium term - both Russia and China face long term relative decline due to their demographic issues, which is why there is a determination to reshape the world order to lock in some form of hegemony while they still can. This isn't something that will blow over anytime soon.
As it drags on, the war is increasingly resembling the horrors of World War 1. That, for me, is the 'wood'. Troops dug into trenches, thousands upon thousands of men dying as they grimly fight over a few square kilometres of territory. Failed offensives in which much stall had been set, various 'wins' and 'defeats' for both sides along the way, and two years in no real prospect of either side gaining a telling advantage. Reliable figures are hard to come by, but probably 200,000+ dead men and counting. Following a wave of enthusiasm at the start, young men in Ukraine are increasingly reluctant to be called up and thrown into the meat grinder.

Most likely the end, whenever it comes, is likely to be a result of exhaustion as much as anything else. Everyone loses. And is anyone even trying to find a way to peace any more?

Meanwhile, the rest of Europe is busily tooling up, mirroring what happened leading up to WW1.
 
As it drags on, the war is increasingly resembling the horrors of World War 1. That, for me, is the 'wood'. Troops dug into trenches, thousands upon thousands of men dying as they grimly fight over a few square kilometres of territory. Failed offensives in which much stall had been set, various 'wins' and 'defeats' for both sides along the way, and two years in no real prospect of either side gaining a telling advantage. Reliable figures are hard to come by, but probably 200,000+ dead men and counting. Following a wave of enthusiasm at the start, young men in Ukraine are increasingly reluctant to be called up and thrown into the meat grinder.

Most likely the end, whenever it comes, is likely to be a result of exhaustion as much as anything else. Everyone loses. And is anyone even trying to find a way to peace any more?

Meanwhile, the rest of Europe is busily tooling up, mirroring what happened leading up to WW1.
It isn't really mirroring what led up to ww1. There are not a group of powers in the middle of Europe lining up against powers in the west and east. There's not the arms race that preceded the first world war. There really isn't. Where's the drones league to mirror the extraparliamentary bodies in Britain and Germany campaigning for stronger navies? The similarities between 2024 and 1914 are far fewer than you suppose, although there's some industrial strife in the UK now as there was 110 years ago. The next war will make ww1 and ww2 look like a cakewalk. And afterwards the slaughter of 14-18 will be relegated as was the slaughter of the French revolutionary and napoleonic wars.
 
As it drags on, the war is increasingly resembling the horrors of World War 1. That, for me, is the 'wood'. Troops dug into trenches, thousands upon thousands of men dying as they grimly fight over a few square kilometres of territory. Failed offensives in which much stall had been set, various 'wins' and 'defeats' for both sides along the way, and two years in no real prospect of either side gaining a telling advantage. Reliable figures are hard to come by, but probably 200,000+ dead men and counting. Following a wave of enthusiasm at the start, young men in Ukraine are increasingly reluctant to be called up and thrown into the meat grinder.

Most likely the end, whenever it comes, is likely to be a result of exhaustion as much as anything else. Everyone loses. And is anyone even trying to find a way to peace any more?

Meanwhile, the rest of Europe is busily tooling up, mirroring what happened leading up to WW1.
Not all those fighting are men.
 
Back
Top Bottom