Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

Consensus seems to be technical cut-out. Nature of said technical cut-out potentially interesting... But also potentially not. Cock-ups happen all the time, and are not exactly unprecedented in Putin's Russia.
And we do cock-ups of a world class standard here too
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cid
You might have already seen this, but Rob Lee is maintaining a twitter thread of all the Russian soldiers confirmed dead. Obviously there are far more then confirmed dead in the thread, but these are the ones to have been confirmed in Russia via news reports and/or public funerals, so tending to be the higher ranking soldiers.



This is a particularly noteworthy/deserved one, which might be the one you were referring to:


Why do so many of their top brass have Tefal heads :hmm:
 
Can anyone explain why the Azov regiment wasn’t disbanded prior to the invasion ?

Good question and no one has answered it.

Given that the conflict now is being viewed as Good ( democracy/ European values etc) vs Evil ( Putin and his mad anti democratic chauvinist authoritarianism) I'm wondering why Azov being incorporated into Ukrainian military isn't seen as a problem by the "West". Or view here that Putin is worse. So set it aside for the moment.

A way to get these Ukrainian fascist out of the military could be, for example, for the West to give arms with condition that far right militias are expelled from Ukrainian military. That Ukrainian armed services screen people for for right sympathies before letting them join.

Bottom line would be that no arms to groups in Ukraine who are far right.
 
Good question and no one has answered it.

Given that the conflict now is being viewed as Good ( democracy/ European values etc) vs Evil ( Putin and his mad anti democratic chauvinist authoritarianism) I'm wondering why Azov being incorporated into Ukrainian military isn't seen as a problem by the "West". Or view here that Putin is worse. So set it aside for the moment.

A way to get these Ukrainian fascist out of the military could be, for example, for the West to give arms with condition that far right militias are expelled from Ukrainian military. That Ukrainian armed services screen people for for right sympathies before letting them join.

Bottom line would be that no arms to groups in Ukraine who are far right.
One argument could be that by incorporating Azov into the army it can be controlled, its ideology (if it has one) can be watered down, its purity as a militia diluted. Right now the Ukrainian military won't be rejecting anyone willing to fight alongside them. If they did, or could, expell them what would that achieve ? A militia with far right leanings left to do its own thing. That might be worse.
 
One argument could be that by incorporating Azov into the army it can be controlled, its ideology (if it has one) can be watered down, its purity as a militia diluted. Right now the Ukrainian military won't be rejecting anyone willing to fight alongside them. If they did, or could, expell them what would that achieve ? A militia with far right leanings left to do its own thing. That might be worse.

I thought the the justification of supporting Ukrainian was about defending democracy etc against authoritarianism and Putin right wing nationalism.

That this justified supplying arms and weapons. ( Ukraine was getting military support prior to invasion btw)

Now your saying letting fascists join the military is OK because they can be talked out of there obnoxious views once in the military. Interesting view of how to deal with far rigtht. Let them join up be trained to use weapons then ask them to be a bit more tolerant. So what happens if they don't? How in practise will this be done?

What The39thStep was asking was why wasn't Azov dispanded prior to invasion?

Given that Ukraine President is going around asking for Western support. That Ukraine is front line in defence of Western values etc I'm perplexed having far right/ fascists in the army is some how ok.

On pragmatic level it might be difficult to do now. But "West" should seek gaurentees from Presidents that after war these people will be rooted out of Ukrainian armed forces.
 
Last edited:
I thought the the justification of supporting Ukrainian was about defending democracy etc against authoritarianism and Putin right wing nationalism.

That this justified supplying arms and weapons. ( Ukraine was getting military support prior to invasion btw)

Now your saying letting fascists join the military is OK because they can be talked out of there obnoxious views once in the military. Interesting view of how to deal with far rigtht. Let them join up be trained to use weapons then ask them to be a bit more tolerant. So what happens if they dont?

What The39thStep was asking was why wasn't Azov dispanded prior to invasion? Given that Ukraine President is going around asking for Western support. That Ukraine is front line in defence of Western values etc I'm perplexed having far right/ fascists in the army is some how ok.

On pragmatic level it might be difficult to do now. But "West" should seek gaurentees that after war these people will be rooted out of Ukrainian armed forces.

You’re probably sitting comfortably at home posting about this. Ukrainians are currently fighting for their lives and country. Do you really think they have time to check each other’s credentials? Or have the luxury of selecting who can apply to fight with them?
 
I thought the the justification of supporting Ukrainian was about defending democracy etc against authoritarianism and Putin right wing nationalism.

That this justified supplying arms and weapons. ( Ukraine was getting military support prior to invasion btw)

Now your saying letting fascists join the military is OK because they can be talked out of there obnoxious views once in the military. Interesting view of how to deal with far rigtht. Let them join up be trained to use weapons then ask them to be a bit more tolerant. So what happens if they don't? How in practise will this be done?

What The39thStep was asking was why wasn't Azov dispanded prior to invasion? Given that Ukraine President is going around asking for Western support. That Ukraine is front line in defence of Western values etc I'm perplexed having far right/ fascists in the army is some how ok.

On pragmatic level it might be difficult to do now. But "West" should seek gaurentees from Presidents that after war these people will be rooted out of Ukrainian armed forces.
The point of support Ukraine is to support a the right to self defence against imperial aggression as far as I am concerned.
 
I thought the the justification of supporting Ukrainian was about defending democracy etc against authoritarianism and Putin right wing nationalism.

That this justified supplying arms and weapons. ( Ukraine was getting military support prior to invasion btw)

Now your saying letting fascists join the military is OK because they can be talked out of there obnoxious views once in the military. Interesting view of how to deal with far rigtht. Let them join up be trained to use weapons then ask them to be a bit more tolerant. So what happens if they don't? How in practise will this be done?

What The39thStep was asking was why wasn't Azov dispanded prior to invasion? Given that Ukraine President is going around asking for Western support. That Ukraine is front line in defence of Western values etc I'm perplexed having far right/ fascists in the army is some how ok.

On pragmatic level it might be difficult to do now. But "West" should seek gaurentees from Presidents that after war these people will be rooted out of Ukrainian armed forces.
I'm not saying all that you say I am. I was thinking of things from a possible perspective of the Ukrainian military. Not what I think.
 
You’re probably sitting comfortably at home posting about this. Ukrainians are currently fighting for their lives and country. Do you really think they have time to check each other’s credentials? Or have the luxury of selecting who can apply to fight with them?

What I object to on this thread is this view.

Its why Ive avoided posting here.

After a while this is what you get.

I think As I'm in a country supplying weapons I should be entitled to a view of gaurenting who they go to. Its Imo totally legitimate to have a view.
 
I beg to differ.
You are the once with no nuance you fucking prick. I guess you want Russia to blow up a few more maternity hospitals to liberate us from the fascists. Fuck you going on ignore before you really piss me off.

Fucking cunt
 
You are the once with no nuance you fucking prick. I guess you want Russia to blow up a few more maternity hospitals to liberate us from the fascists. Fuck you going on ignore before you really piss me off.

Fucking cunt

Precisely why I've avoided posting on this thread.

Your confirming why I've only posted occasionally on it.

The level of nastiness and pure abuse on this thread has gone beyond reasoned debate. Or any respect for differing views.

This is a post that is frankly disgusting.
 
So it good vs evil and their is no nuances at all in this conflict.

The opposite - there is nuance: Ukraine is a state/society with some imperfections, it is by no stretch perfect, and the 'long grass' it's applications to both the EU and NATO in are by no means entirely down to its territorial dispute with Russia.

Russia however is a whole other barrel of fish.

It's the difference between a medium grey and an almost coal mine black.

It's only the headbangers who can't cope with the nuance and the shades of grey - as demonstrated more widely by the endless splits, denouncements and feuds within the left itself - so obsessed with ideological purity that they can no longer differenciate between greys and darker greys, because, to them, all that is outside their groupsicle is jack-booted fascism, and indistinguishable from each other.

Everyone else can cope with differing greys, and sub-optimal, but workable, solutions - it's only the obsessives and the cranks who can't...
 
The opposite - there is nuance: Ukraine is a state/society with some imperfections, it is by no stretch perfect, and the 'long grass' it's applications to both the EU and NATO in are by no means entirely down to its territorial dispute with Russia.

Russia however is a whole other barrel of fish.

It's the difference between a medium grey and an almost coal mine black.

It's only the headbangers who can't cope with the nuance and the shades of grey - as demonstrated more widely by the endless splits, denouncements and feuds within the left itself - so obsessed with ideological purity that they can no longer differenciate between greys and darker greys, because, to them, all that is outside their groupsicle is jack-booted fascism, and indistinguishable from each other.

Everyone else can cope with differing greys, and sub-optimal, but workable, solutions - it's only the obsessives and the cranks who can't...
Thank you.
 
Back
Top Bottom