Hey, hoopy froods
Why?It's bizarre that anyone could be offended by being referred to collectively.
Why?
I'm proud to be a man. Lots of other men are too.
Equally, many many women are proud to be women.
I'd venture to say the overwhelming majority of people identify with the gender they were born with and are happy to do so.
Why should we all start getting diluted into some kind of asexual soup to accommodate the few who don't associate with their birth sex?
I think everyone deserves to feel happy, but I don't think TFL needs to change FFS.
Are you proud to be white? Do you think announcements should address white folks and coloured folks or something? What was your old username?
Well I'm a hard working husband and father who thinks you sound like an arsehole.Yes mate. I'm basically proud to be me. Because I have done my best to be the best husband, father, son and man that I could be. I think a lot of folks on here feel guilty for not doing that themselves.
Why?
I'm proud to be a man. Lots of other men are too.
Equally, many many women are proud to be women.
I'd venture to say the overwhelming majority of people identify with the gender they were born with and are happy to do so.
Why should we all start getting diluted into some kind of asexual soup to accommodate the few who don't associate with their birth sex?
I think everyone deserves to feel happy, but I don't think TFL needs to change FFS.
If you're proud to be a man, why does your ego needs this identity to be affirmed at every opportunity?Why?
I'm proud to be a man. Lots of other men are too.
Equally, many many women are proud to be women.
I'd venture to say the overwhelming majority of people identify with the gender they were born with and are happy to do so.
Why should we all start getting diluted into some kind of asexual soup to accommodate the few who don't associate with their birth sex?
I think everyone deserves to feel happy, but I don't think TFL needs to change FFS.
They should reintroduce it, but as "Mind the gender gap!"
Why?
I'm proud to be a man. Lots of other men are too.
Equally, many many women are proud to be women.
Why should we all start getting diluted into some kind of asexual soup to accommodate the few who don't associate with their birth sex?
I'd venture to say the overwhelming majority of people identify with the gender they were born with and are happy to do so.
I think everyone deserves to feel happy, but I don't think TFL needs to change FFS.
Every woman I've spoken to in TfL and via Twitter except two that I would define as anti-trans (with their own peculiar agenda) is supportive of these changes because they see it as another step away from the old patriarchal attitudes that persist long after women supposedly achieved equality in our society. So that's most people. Plus trans and many GNC people - quite a few in LGBT+ other than trans people support this, probably most men don;t really care about this issue particularly and many will support it.I can see your point but, and again I may be wrong, but less than 1% of the population doesn't identify as either binary gender. I'm not necessarily against but I just sort of elicit 'ah come on, do we have to? Is anyone really that worried?' this is the sort of thing that winds less rational people up and can foster animosity.
They are for gradually removing the ladies and gentlemen from messages as and when the messages are normally updated (this happens as a matter of course), so that there is no additional cost. No need to make a big hoohah out of it.
Fanfare stuff and people knee jerk react the opposite way you want them too. Stealth change things and attitudes slowly change without them realising and fighting it.
Every woman I've spoken to in TfL and via Twitter except two that I would define as anti-trans (with their own peculiar agenda) is supportive of these changes because they see it as another step away from the old patriarchal attitudes that persist long after women supposedly achieved equality in our society. So that's most people. Plus trans and many GNC people - quite a few in LGBT+ other than trans people support this, probably most men don;t really care about this issue particularly and many will support it.
And it is a myth that trans people, including non-binary people are only 1%. We don;t know what the figures are but what we do know is every time this is measured it goes up. Last time I saw a figure it was way above 1%.
So - I think the only people against this change really are a few conservatives and a whole bunch of bitter men who see their privilege slipping away drop by drop.
fuck off, you prickI know someone who is against the change.
They are against it because it will cost additional money and that money is being spent to make a big political statement. Someone somewhere is using gender issues to score points.
They are for gradually removing the ladies and gentlemen from messages as and when the messages are normally updated (this happens as a matter of course), so that there is no additional cost. No need to make a big hoohah out of it.
Fanfare stuff and people knee jerk react the opposite way you want them too. Stealth change things and attitudes slowly change without them realising and fighting it.
fuck off, you prick
If Stella is correct they were doing it subtly. They made a policy and slowly implemented it.I think he does have a point with the whole 'just doing it subtly' argument. I mean why make a big hoohah about it? I can honestly say I would not have noticed if it had been slipped in quietly when the messages get updated periodically. I think that's the case for most people, I also think it's the case for most people that they're not really fussed. It probably is the hoohar about it that's caused any objection, mild or otherwise, and any eyerolling. I don't think it's anything to do with men being bitter about having their privilege removed or whatever.
Ah that takes me back . It's the 'Stand clear of the doors please' bit at the end that puts the icing on the cake. He'd be too stern and patriarchal for today's world