Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Tory UK EU Exit Referendum

2008 - Johnston: 43%, Livingstone: 37%
2012 - Johnston: 44%, Livingstone: 40%

And it came down to second round too. Hardly thumping victory stuff.

No, not the greatest of victories, certainly. A win though. (I do note the smaller margin in the second win. At that rate Livingston would have beeen mayor in a decade or two.)

Do you have the actual numbers?

Hang on a moment, surely you don't support Livingston?
 
Rather an insult to the Londoners, who have elected him twice, and were he standing again, very likely for a third time.

Shows how bereft of quality the electoral process is, when a no-mark with good PR can become Mayor of London pretty much based on a pre-election tidal wave of publicity from the right-wing press.
It's not an insult to Londoners (although many more of us didn't vote for Johnson, than did), at all.
 
In your opinion, which is not the opinion of the majority of Londoners.

He wasn't elected by a "majority of Londoners", you tedious, pensionable reactionary. He was elected by a majority of those who voted. That does not, ipso facto, translate to "a majority of Londoners".
 
Well, you say that the majority of those eligible didn't vote for him. I should imagine that that is correct. There is scarcely, if any, politician of any stripe that takes a majority of the votes.

Are you saying then, that if those opposed to Boris hadn't been so lazy, and had actually turned up to vote, things would have been different. Well, they didn't, either through indolence, apathy or a satisfaction with the status quo. Who knows?

It comes down again to living in the Urban bubble, and believing your own bullshit to mirror popular opinion, it doesn't. It may surprise you to know that the sacred cows of Urban are of zero interest to the vast majority of people.

No, I'm not saying anything of the sort.

What I will say is that Boris Johnson's influence is based primarily on his celebrity status and media profile, and the fact that he's been (fairly narrowly) elected Mayor of London twice doesn't make him the sort of serious or genuinely influential politician you seem to think it does.

Plenty of non-Urban Londoners I know share my opinion of him, and his decision to support Leave will make fuck all difference to them either way.
 
Hang on a moment, surely you don't support Livingston?

To be Mayor of London over Boris? Despite Livington's faults, yeah, any day. Livingston did a fucking good job I thought as Mayor - better imo than Boris has.

(and given that you continue to refer to the SNP as Nazi's, I'm not really sure I should worry too much about your judgement either way)
 
It is unconscionable that any court outside this country can strike down the decision of a British court.

It's no different to the supreme court overturning a crown court decision, unless you're a xenophobe. The only thing which should matter is a fair and just decision being made, not who makes it. But that would require taking each case on its merits rather than making grand sweeping statements about Johnny Foreigner interfering in Proper British Justice.

e2a: I doubt it's coincidence that so many of the cases that have right wingers up in arms about the supposed tyranny of human rights are those which involve the rights of foreign nationals.
 
It comes down again to living in the Urban bubble, and believing your own bullshit to mirror popular opinion, it doesn't. It may surprise you to know that the sacred cows of Urban are of zero interest to the vast majority of people.
Scottish Nazi Party -> over 50% of the vote
 
Sorry, given the hugely skewed demographic on here, I can't help but chuckle about the comments regarding Boris. It so far from reality that it is almost hallucinogenic.

Go away from Urban and ask people's opinion of Boris, then have a reality check.

Anyway, I know what Boris has done. I'd be very interested to see if the collective populace of Urban can even come close.

How many published authors on the boards, of books that have been reviewed by the national newspapers? How many MPs on the boards? How many on the boards been elected even to a Town Council?

If Boris is a joke, what does that make you lot?

Have you read any of Boris's books? His fiction makes Dick Francis look like a master of imaginative prose. His attempts at autobiography invariably get torn to pieces as fiction by his biographers. His political writings are poorer and even less analytic than Thatcher's.

I don't pretend to be a politician, but I know plenty of former and present councillors (of all parties), and a couple of former MPs, and they all worked and work a lot harder than that money-grabbing, sexually-incontinent egotist. He's a show-boater and a self-publicist whom London would be well shot of.
 
The panjandrums of this union (the UK) entered into a contractual arrangement that explicitly allowed this of their own free will, way back at Maastricht. It was always well-understood across the party-political spectrum that signing up for a packet of measures that would lead to incorporating the ECHR would have the effect that you loathe. If you feel this disgusted by one particular part of that arrangement, you should have been doing something about it since Maastricht. I'm betting you've done very little except sound off about it, in the last 25+ years.

Not a great deal you can do about it. You need a majority of the elected politicians to pass legislation, and that isn't going to happen any time soon.

It's a democracy. You don't like some of the things your government does, but unless you have majority support, it isn't going to change. The fact that a hell of a lot of the population doesn't know the difference between the ECHR and the European Court of Justice doesn't help either. I heard a muppet on the TV just a few moments ago, citing the ECHR as the reason he wants the UK to leave the EU.

I do not like the EU one little bit, however, if we leave, I really don't see a lot changing. If you want to trade in the EU, you have to demonstrate that you meet their requirements, which is the same shit, but without even the whisper of a voice we have now. I also don't think that trading with EU post exit, would be quite as cosy an arrangement as the 'Out' campaign are peddling. There would be nothing to stop the EU slapping whopping iomport levies on our goods and services. I doubt if the City would do well either, it could easily be replaced with Paris and Frankfurt. If it became more expensive to trade in London, the money would leave.

There is also the point that practically fuck all of British industry (such as it is) is British owned. Without unfettered access to the EU markets, how long would Nissan or Honda, for example, stay here?

I could kill Cameron for this*. He had no need to promise a referendum. We are now headed hell-wards on the proverbial handcart.

*Metaphorically.
 
Have you read any of Boris's books? His fiction makes Dick Francis look like a master of imaginative prose. His attempts at autobiography invariably get torn to pieces as fiction by his biographers. His political writings are poorer and even less analytic than Thatcher's.

I don't pretend to be a politician, but I know plenty of former and present councillors (of all parties), and a couple of former MPs, and they all worked and work a lot harder than that money-grabbing, sexually-incontinent egotist. He's a show-boater and a self-publicist whom London would be well shot of.

You really love him, deep down?

(I have this vision of you physically foaming at the mouth. :D You feel about Boris what I feel about the SNSP.)
 
No, I'm not saying anything of the sort.

What I will say is that Boris Johnson's influence is based primarily on his celebrity status and media profile, and the fact that he's been (fairly narrowly) elected Mayor of London twice doesn't make him the sort of serious or genuinely influential politician you seem to think it does.

Plenty of non-Urban Londoners I know share my opinion of him, and his decision to support Leave will make fuck all difference to them either way.

Even the penny is dropping among Tories that Johnson is a self-serving mediocre narcissist.

Quentin Letts of the Mail put it well when he said of Johnson.

The Commons sees through you in a way that other institutions don’t. It could see through the accent, and the fact that he was trying to ventilate false anxieties about matters in which he wasn’t really very interested. The reaction was quite often silence. You see, Boris isn’t angry. You’ve got to be angry: you’ve got to feel things as an MP, but there is no soul, no church in him. No belief. Most people don’t just go into politics out of vanity, but maybe he has.
Boris Johnson: Everything about you is phoney | Coffee House
 
Well Sasaferrato ?
Anything to say, or was it your usual tory bullshit?

It all you Marxist cunt.

Stop being childish. There is no need for 'ad hom', apart from which, you are wrong, I am neither a member, or supporter, of the Conservative party. I was, until Cameron/Clegg came along. The welfare reforms in particular, and the absolutely dishonest way that they are being applied is nauseating.

I will not support the Conservative party again until this current lot are gone, and as they are all younger than me, it will be never.
 
Last edited:
It all you Marxist cunt.

handbags.jpg
 
The whole thing, probably, as I doubt he's actually read the Charter.

I have. I'm not in the habit of opposing things I haven't read.

The Charter chapters themselves are one thing, the judges interpretation is something else. Some of the judgements have been absolutely perverse.

Were it possible, I would ditch the court, but keep the Charter, but enforced by our Supreme Court.
 
I have. I'm not in the habit of opposing things I haven't read.

The Charter chapters themselves are one thing, the judges interpretation is something else. Some of the judgements have been absolutely perverse.

Were it possible, I would ditch the court, but keep the Charter, but enforced by our Supreme Court.
Half an hour ago you said you wanted to ditch the Convention; all of it.
 
Voting for Boris was an insult to London, so if one of my city-kin did so they are fully deserving of insulting.

Uh huh, however, perhaps not with the most thumping of margins, Boris won.

One of the reasons I detest the far left is their inability to combine under one banner, write a hymn sheet and sing from it.

Many of the ideas of the 'far left' are far from loony. An emphasis on building affordable housing, proper payment in employment, a real effort against the tax dodgers amongst other things. Why can't the FL combine? Genuine question. Surely you can see that 1 x 1000 is more effective that 10 x 50? Greater mass, pooled resources...
 
To be Mayor of London over Boris? Despite Livington's faults, yeah, any day. Livingston did a fucking good job I thought as Mayor - better imo than Boris has.

A case in point regarding Livingstone doing a good job: Prior to the 2008 Mayoral election, he'd set aside a fairly large sum of money for feasibility studies regarding making London Underground and London Overground more accessible to those of us who don't have perfect health; use wheelchairs or have small children in buggies. Boris axed it and, despite strong and consistent lobbying, has done the sum of fuck-all, given that the bus companies had already signed up to all new stock being of the accessible variety.
 
Back
Top Bottom