Lord Camomile
Yipchaa!
What the fuck?! I get a string of people to deal with at the desk and suddenly they're four down?!
Fuck this match
Fuck this match
Ta for that.What the fuck?! I get a string of people to deal with at the desk and suddenly they're four down?!
Fuck this match
I'm off at 4:30pm and have a 90 minute commute home. You're welcome in advanceTa for that.
Get working after tea.
Clarke made it very clear yesterday that he didn't agree with coming into this match with only two Mitches. 'Ask the selectors' was his answer to why MM wasn't playing. And on the field he made his point with filth from Warner. tbh, that he would do something like that to make a point on the first day of a live test match shows how shot he is mentally. We might just be watching Clarke play his final test innings right here.Let's talk about team selection. Specifically, Australia's decision to go in to the match a man down by swapping one Marsh brother for the other, thus losing a front line bowler and adding a walking wicket to an already brittle batting order. Should have dropped Voges for Siddle, at least they would have had slightly more firepower and a non-shot playing stubborn arse with the bat
Clarke made it very clear yesterday that he didn't agree with coming into this match with only two Mitches. 'Ask the selectors' was his answer to why MM wasn't playing. And on the field he made his point with filth from Warner. tbh, that he would do something like that to make a point on the first day of a live test match shows how shot he is mentally. We might just be watching Clarke play his final test innings right here.
I agree, Clarke looks shot. It's not just out of form, he looks like he doesn't know why he is even holding a bat, like he has no idea how to play the game. Was it not Clarke who was instrumental in removing the captain from the selection committee? Bit rich to complain about team selection if that was the case, then again it was a poor selection, it just screamed that they didn't trust their batting and Clarke going down to 5 just rammed that home.
Let's talk about team selection. Specifically, Australia's decision to go in to the match a man down by swapping one Marsh brother for the other, thus losing a front line bowler and adding a walking wicket to an already brittle batting order. Should have dropped Voges for Siddle, at least they would have had slightly more firepower and a non-shot playing stubborn arse with the bat
I read somewhere or other last week that Lehmann imposed that as a condition of his becoming coach, and Clarke has been moaning about it ever since.
Siddle's a bit unlucky not to get a go, I think, given the shortcomings of both Starc and Hazlewood. Despite his 6-fer here, Starc still hasn't proven himself a worldbeater in test cricket - far too much was made of his white-ball success. Siddle would have given a bit of balance alongside Johnson, who I still think is mostly a terrific bowler.
Then there's Pattinson. What's happened to him?Sure Siddle is unlucky not to have had a game, but he's never been more then OK, he'll do a job but not set the world on light. Pat Cummins is the one to watch out for.
Then there's Pattinson. What's happened to him?
Yeah. Latest medical thinking on that is that the bones don't harden properly until you're 25-26. Mitch Johnson suffered five separate stress fractures in his back before he played test cricket.Isn't he another of the fast bowlers who've had chronic injury problems?
On tour with the A side, alongside AgarThen there's Pattinson. What's happened to him?
I agree about Siddle, but he's a reliable trier.
Anyway, Aus's real problem is the batting. Rogers is retiring, Clarke's on his way out, Watson's finally lost all his reviews, Marsh is crap. They're in for a mass clear-out, but who knows who comes in.
Clarke expected to retire at the end of the series.