Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Ashes 2015

Well 430 certainly gives you enough to bowl at. England now need to use the new ball a bit better than they've done in a number of recent matches.
 
its 10.30 pm and ive just got to see whats happening,430 you bastards,Joe Root should have been gone,"its come off his thoomb"said Lloydy,fair play to your lot tho,done the job,not a draw in sight tho,we will be hanging onto that urn like a scotsman on a 5 pound note
 
meh! Walesonline is a shitrag anyway!

you ever been down here then? :hmm:

I haven't been to Cardiff for many years. I should be there now as a group of lads from my club got tickets and are there for the whole test but I had to work. My old club used to tour to Swansea once a year though, and my best game ever (51 not out, and 6 wickets) was against BP Llandarcy in 1987!

We still lost. :D
 
Lovely to see Johnson leaking a ton of runs, getting no wickets and not looking all that monstrous. Let's hope he's back to his usual self of bowling like a demented sea lion for the rest of the series.
 
Does that bloke know anything about cricket?

One is a perfectly fair criticism, while it's not terrible (and has benefited England) it's not a wicket that has done the game any favours. To pretend otherwise is just idiocy.

And while the size argument doesn't hold that much water with me this
But the choice boils down to the strategic approach of whether you keep Test match cricket among a small cartel of larger grounds (Lords, the Oval, Trent Bridge, Edgbaston, Old Trafford and Headingley) or instead take the spectacle on tour to areas without a history of hosting matches.

Since that decision was unequivocally taken by the ECB more than a decade ago, it seems a bit churlish to moan about it now.
is a particularly stupid comment. The whole reason why Glamorgan (and other counties) are in the financial difficulties he mentions elsewhere is because of the ECB's stupid bidding process. The idea people can't criticise that idea because it was decided some time ago is fucking moronic. It was a stupid idea at the time and it's still a stupid idea now.
 
Last edited:
Does that bloke know anything about cricket?

One is a perfectly fair criticism, while it's not terrible (and has benefited England) it's not a wicket that has done the game any favours. To pretend otherwise is just idiocy.

And while the size argument doesn't hold that much water with me this is a particularly stupid comment. The whole reason why Glamorgan (and other counties) are in the financial difficulties he mentions elsewhere is because of the ECB's stupid bidding process. The idea people can't criticise that idea because it was decided some time ago is fucking moronic. It was a stupid idea at the time and it's still a stupid idea now.
Sophia Gardens isn't even that small, 15,000 innit? Not much different to Trent Bridge for example

I objected to the Welsh anthem too. But then I objected to the Australian anthem and GSTQ being played as well, completely un-cricket. Fucking nonsense

Anyway, local paper in chippy response to real or imagined slights. Shock horror
 
Does that bloke know anything about cricket?

One is a perfectly fair criticism, while it's not terrible (and has benefited England) it's not a wicket that has done the game any favours. To pretend otherwise is just idiocy.

And while the size argument doesn't hold that much water with me this is a particularly stupid comment. The whole reason why Glamorgan (and other counties) are in the financial difficulties he mentions elsewhere is because of the ECB's stupid bidding process. The idea people can't criticise that idea because it was decided some time ago is fucking moronic. It was a stupid idea at the time and it's still a stupid idea now.

We've seen some good cricket - both batting and bowling - with 700 runs and 15 wickets in two days. The game is fascinatingly poised - could go to either side, or to draw. I don't think there's much wrong with this pitch!
 
We've seen some good cricket - both batting and bowling - with 700 runs and 15 wickets in two days. The game is fascinatingly poised - could go to either side, or to draw. I don't think there's much wrong with this pitch!
The position of the game owes more to the approach of both teams (particularly the over-agresstion of the Australians) than the wicket. I'm not saying it should be reported to the ICC but it's not giving a lot to any of the bowlers - no bounce, no pace, not much movement, not even much turn.
 
The position of the game owes more to the approach of both teams (particularly the over-agresstion of the Australians) than the wicket. I'm not saying it should be reported to the ICC but it's not giving a lot to any of the bowlers - no bounce, no pace, not much movement.

It's rewarding patient, probing bowling. Nothing wrong with that in a test match, in my opinion. And, best of all, it's giving nothing to MJ!
 
The position of the game owes more to the approach of both teams (particularly the over-agresstion of the Australians) than the wicket. I'm not saying it should be reported to the ICC but it's not giving a lot to any of the bowlers - no bounce, no pace, not much movement.
Tend to agree. At least three of the Australian dismissals today were fucking idiotic shots. The pitch has got sod all in it for the pace bowlers
 
The position of the game owes more to the approach of both teams (particularly the over-agresstion of the Australians) than the wicket. I'm not saying it should be reported to the ICC but it's not giving a lot to any of the bowlers - no bounce, no pace, not much movement, not even much turn.

The pitch did exactly what it was meant to - to stop the demented sea lion.
 
Tend to agree. At least three of the Australian dismissals today were fucking idiotic shots. The pitch has got sod all in it for the pace bowlers

Mitchell Starc took five wickets against a team that won the toss and elected to bat.

I really think people are overdoing the criticism of the pitch. I think it's making for a good game.
 
I don't actually think Johnson bowled that badly fwiw

It seems like he's back to bowling how he has done for most of his career, ie not too bad, quick and mainly not at the stumps. He's done well since the last ashes series but hopefully, as I said, he's returned to his normal self but that's difficult to determine whether that's true or not off the back of a single innings.
 
Bollox, got engrossed with arguing about Tube strikes and missed a classic Watson lbw
 
Back
Top Bottom