England seem to be going very well
Ah ha its the first time this series i have been able to pay my undivided attentionHenry is fucking great,Tuf too
We have the same broadcast
Gosh, they were not joking about that pork pie!
He rang the bell at the beginning of the innings, so he's definitely there.No Boycs seemingly this game unless I've missed something...
I think he's determined to make Cricket as interminable when he's commentating as it was when he was batting.He rang the bell at the beginning of the innings, so he's definitely there.
His annoyance to insight ratio is getting worse, as far as I'm concerned.
He rang the bell at the beginning of the innings, so he's definitely there.
His annoyance to insight ratio is getting worse, as far as I'm concerned.
I think he's determined to make Cricket as interminable when he's commentating as it was when he was batting.
The price for his insights is very high though.annoyingly, though, Boycott does understand the game better than most.
Surely spinners have to be, otherwise they get carted around and never prosper.Tuffers is surprisingly insightful.
Very true. I was just thinking that after I posted. At his best, Tuffers was actually a very clever bowler.Surely spinners have to be, otherwise they get carted around and never prosper.
I kind of like him. His periodic tirades against the Iraq War cheer me up. He's just reached the age where he doesn't give a damn what others think of him.I like Boycott. He's a part of the fabric of cricket.
"We should never have invaded Iraq in the first place that's pushed out gently on the off side and there's no run."
He does love the game, and he doesn't harp on about 'my day' like twat Truman did. He embraces the way things have changed and certainly doesn't think everyone should play just like he did (Truman again).Boycott loves the game, and he cuts through a lot of the nonsense. His dismissal of all the fuss about reverse swing was great.
Yes, I liked Trevor Bailey a lot. He seemed like an unfailingly decent chap. Mike Selvey was good in a different way in that he didn't hold back in his criticism.Yeah, I like Boycs as a commentator.
My favourite summariser was probably Trevor Bailey. I also liked Mike Selvey and actually, Graham Thorpe did a few tests a couple of years ago and he was really good.
Cool. Physics embedded in cricketWith the new ball, bowlers use the seam to make the ball swing. Wikipedia says this:
'the raised seam and other minor imperfections in the ball's surface can induce turbulence while air flowing over other parts of the ball remains laminar'
If there's also a bump on one side of the ball this could easily negate the effect of the seam, depending where the bump is. Plus, the important fact about swinging the ball using the seam is that the swing is controllable.
Conventional (as opposed to reverse) swing bowlers like a hard, well-shaped ball. A ball that is randomly misshapen may well not swing at all as the distribution of the turbulence is also random.