No, the rule is 200 shy...Why didn't Australia follow on? I thought that you had to get half of the opposing team's total to avoid the follow on? 160 isn't half of 332, or have I missed something? I still don't fully understand cricket
Nah, for five day matches you need to be within 200 of the opposition, and in four-day and three-day matches within 150.Why didn't Australia follow on? I thought that you had to get half of the opposing team's total to avoid the follow on? 160 isn't half of 332, or have I missed something? I still don't fully understand cricket
Apparently one of the papers had a headline this morning about England relying on the Oval dust turning to Ashes.
Probably a paper owned by one of your compatriots.pffffffttt,thats the sort of bullshit that sells papers
No, the rule is 200 shy...
Nah, for five day matches you need to be within 200 of the opposition, and in four-day and three-day matches within 150.
And, of course, the bowling team has the choice of whether or not to enforce the follow-on.Oh I see, I always thought it was half.
Thanks for learnin' me
They have plenty of time, no heroics needed, get about 250 and put the Aussies in
With three days left, get to 450 and put the Aussies in!They have plenty of time, no heroics needed, get about 250 and put the Aussies in
With three days left, get to 450 and put the Aussies in!
Seriously, I don't see any declaration before there's a 500 lead, and with so much time left and a good forecast, why would there be.
I'm not sure declarations will ever be an issue.With three days left, get to 450 and put the Aussies in!
Seriously, I don't see any declaration before there's a 500 lead, and with so much time left and a good forecast, why would there be.
Thing is, it's not the wicket that's given England their wickets today, and Australia don't have a frontline spinner. I see no reason why England shouldn't equal their first innings score, and when one side gets away in a test, the losing side can become very dispirited. I actually think England's top order should be a bit disappointed with the way they got out yesterday and be looking to dig in a bit more this time.I'm not sure declarations will ever be an issue.
Average 103.5Aussies already bowling part-time spin.
Certainly England got their wickets through application and good bowling, but I still think that it's quite likely that both sides will end up taking 20 wickets in this match.Thing is, it's not the wicket that's given England their wickets today, and Australia don't have a frontline spinner. I see no reason why England shouldn't equal their first innings score, and when one side gets away in a test, the losing side can become very dispirited. I actually think England's top order should be a bit disappointed with the way they got out yesterday and be looking to dig in a bit more this time.
He's looked uncomfortable for most of the Summer.He never looked comfortable.
What's more worrying is that he's a weather vane for how England's batting is going.Bell leaves all the questions about him unanswered for me.