Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The American mass shooting thread

My understanding is that some of the parents on the scene wanted to do exactly this. (Maybe they were themselves armed - quite possibly, this being Texas.)

Of course none of us can know how we will react to a particular situation until we are there. But it's not a good look to be a trained, armed group who are not only not doing anything but are stopping others who are not trained from doing anything.
yeh we've perhaps been through this before, that there are two police forces (at least) in uvalde - the first a six-strong police district force, who have received some training in dealing with an active shooter situation, the second a force with forty officers on the books who it seems have not been trained in dealing with an active shooter situation. the commander of the first was in charge on the day.
Thing is, this is supposed to be the whole point of training - to give you a better chance of not fucking it right up.

While I do partially agree with you here, I also think those parents and everyone else who lives in that town are entitled to ask of their trained police 'what's the fucking point of you?' Ignoring questions of individuals, collectively they fucked it right up despite their training.
which force do you mean, the pd untrained in this situation or the ucisd cops who have been trained (to a degree) and were in charge?
 
Thing is, this is supposed to be the whole point of training - to give you a better chance of not fucking it right up.

While I do partially agree with you here, I also think those parents and everyone else who lives in that town are entitled to ask of their trained police 'what's the fucking point of you?' Ignoring questions of individuals, collectively they fucked it right up despite their training.
Are your standard local cops given the kind of training necessary to deal with an attack by someone using battlefield weapons? I doubt it.
 
Any weapon can be a battlefield weapon.
VnPCK2f.jpg


Fancy spotting him at even 50 yards?
 
Guess the point is they are likely to have a better chance than the infants?
Sure. So what though? How does them having a better chance than the kids being slaughtered make their knees any less likely to buckle and their nerves less likely to fail?

I don't dispute that the police response to this appears to have been a total disaster - but IMO it seems likely that a significant part of the reason for such a disastrous response is that a civilian police force is simply not psychologically equipped to deal with people armed with this kind of weaponry.
 
People - even cops - who go up against psychopaths with machine guns are rightly lauded as heroes - surely the flipside of that is that not everyone has it in them to be a hero
 
well at least we all not be distracted from the real problem of America and it serious gun problem :)
 
Sure. So what though? How does them having a better chance than the kids being slaughtered make their knees any less likely to buckle and their nerves less likely to fail?

I don't dispute that the police response to this appears to have been a total disaster - but IMO it seems likely that a significant part of the reason for such a disastrous response is that a civilian police force is simply not psychologically equipped to deal with people armed with this kind of weaponry.
The parents were psychologically equipped alright and the police appear to have held them back with inter alia tasers even wrestling at least one individual to the ground.I am doubtless just another naive civilian but I am reminded of the bloke with the Narwhal tusk on London Bridge.Can't imagine he spent much time on a risk assessment before wading in-on his own time.
 
and ban the education of children


without the problem that is school and education we have none of this problem
 
It worked on London Bridge.The police were worse than useless and i really don't see any point in trying to defend them.
ETA meant the tusk did.
 
It worked on London Bridge.The police were worse than useless and i really don't see any point in trying to defend them.
This is the bottom line here. If the police hadn't been there, the parents would have stormed the place. Maybe that would have worked out badly as well, but there's a chance it would have saved lives.

Sometimes just one person taking decisive action and disregarding their own safety is all it takes. It reminds me of the 911 bombings and the plane that didn't crash into a building because passengers stepped in. On the other flights, passengers didn't step in. Sometimes people can collectively freeze, as these coppers did.
 
This is the bottom line here. If the police hadn't been there, the parents would have stormed the place. Maybe that would have worked out badly as well, but there's a chance it would have saved lives.

Sometimes just one person taking decisive action and disregarding their own safety is all it takes. It reminds me of the 911 bombings and the plane that didn't crash into a building because passengers stepped in. On the other flights, passengers didn't step in. Sometimes people can collectively freeze, as these coppers did.
If I remember right that only happened because they learnt about what had happened to the other 2 planes. Not because people on some planes froze while one's on another didn't.
 
If I remember right that only happened because they learnt about what had happened to the other 2 planes. Not because people on some planes froze while one's on another didn't.

Up to then, the hijacking script was very much to “sit tight”. It wasn’t a simple case of collectively freezing iirc.
 
Tbf they're aiming for pretty much the end of anything provided by local, state or federal government...
 
Tbf they're aiming for pretty much the end of anything provided by local, state or federal government...

There's been several experiments in Libertarian paradise towns and they all failed:




One of the towns is unironically named "Grafton."
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom