Rompipalle
“Mad as hell & I’m not going to take this anymore”
It’s a bit pathetic really, isn’t it?I see it on running groups I'm in where Americans discuss open carry holsters to wear when out running amongst other insanities.
It’s a bit pathetic really, isn’t it?I see it on running groups I'm in where Americans discuss open carry holsters to wear when out running amongst other insanities.
Pretty low bar that comparisonI pity the children growing up in Palestine, Syria or North Korea a whole lot more than those in the USA, who, on average, will be subjected to significantly more violence during childhood than Americans.
I beg to differ.What do you think forums are for? For you to waffle on with your dreary, insubstantial and inane middle england "analysis" and nobody to call you up on it? You talked about not having sympathy with the victims of a mass shooting in a school. I'm not the one who looks like a twat.
E per l'appunto, visto che sei così fedele al tuo username, ti ricordo gentilmente che anche tu sei libera di ignorare ciò che ti dico, ciao!
There really are some pedantic fuckers around who would rather nitpick on your posts (while showing very poor comprehension skills) than actually engage with the subject.At no stage did I say I had no sympathy for the victims of shootings so fuck off with your lies.
I said I had no sympathy for America as a country because it holds the solution to its gun-crime problems in its own hands but chooses to do nothing about it, other than pointless hand-wringing and offering equally pointless thoughts and sodding prayers.
And for your information, I'm not "middle-English". I'm not English at all, so shove your baseless assumptions up your capacious arse - second shelf on the left, where you keep you manners.
Hold on, that’s not what was said or intended. What was said was:"I have no sympathy for them" = engaging with the subject
Thank you so much for this.Hold on, that’s not what was said or intended. What was said was:
“I don’t wish to seem uncaring but I no longer have any sympathy for a country which has the simplest solution readily to hand and yet refuses to even consider implementing it.”
Now, it’s not what I’d have said, but I understood it to have been an expression of exasperation, weariness, and being at one’s wits’ end.
It’s hard to watch this happening over and over. I lived in Dunblane for 25 years, and had relatives in the school at the time of the tragedy. I have friends whose children lost their lives. I know survivors, and I know one paramedic who was on the scene that day who is still struggling with PTSD and alcoholism as a direct result of what he saw.
And yet I could tell what Rompipalle was trying to express. Imperfectly, perhaps, but who has the right words in the face of the ongoing tragedy? Who can coral their emotions in adequately eloquent turns of phrase? I couldn’t at the news. I just felt sick.
Sadly this meant another example of a particularly gross phenomenon of the last year or two.... yes, 'people transvestigating' the shooter. Because early headlines had 'female' in quotes (presumably because identity wasn't 100% confirmed, not because they had identified the suspect but not their gender) and because 'she went by two names', seriously I saw someone online saying that. These people are literally drooling at the mouth in the hopes that a person who commits an atrocity will turn out to be trans.Shooter was a 15 year old girl apparently:
Wisconsin school shooting was reported by a 2nd-grader, police say
A teenage student opened fire at the Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wisconsin, on Monday, killing a teacher and another teenage student in the final week before Christmas break. The shooter died by apparent suicide, police said.apnews.com
FWIW the school I work at does lockdown drills, pretty sure it’s a requirement in all English or UK schools and part of safeguarding requirements. Not specific to gun risk but it is there.As a parent it would break my heart to think of my children having to undertake regular lockdown/active shooter drills simply because there’s a sector of society that almost fetishises firearms and reveres the legislation which permits them to be owned, carried and then used to slaughter innocent children.
It's certainly happened as a quick search shows https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/06/us/middle-school-ballistic-shields-trnd/index.htmlNot sure if this is true, satire or rage bait. It’s sad that it could be any.
View attachment 458574