Nice and neutral of the BBC to have this as their main headline all morning. Aren’t civil servants supposed to be neutral, because there’s no way this statement meets that criteria.
View attachment 189056
Yes, it is utterly absurd to say that a government-funded service should not be an issue in an election.But for which party is the NHS their greatest strength? Hardly neutral to say it shouldn’t be in play. The run-down of services is tangible to everyone, and the party responsible for this does need challenging on it. They don’t get to dictate what issues can and can’t be raised.
I popped onto twitter for the first time in ages and there were a few tweets about the NHS that had been piled on by various bots/Turning Point weirdos quoting the same few stats in favour of the government, and a similar number of bots/racist twats claiming it was all due to immigration overloading the service. They know they’re vulnerable on this and want to close it down when raised.
'Don't politicise health service' was directed at all parties, so seems neutral to me.
Don't use NHS as political weapon - health bosses
But for which party is the NHS their greatest strength?
interesting they ask which party leader rather than the more usual which party. I bet you'd get quit a different answer if you just asked the latterIronically polls recently have shown Johnson & Corbyn neck & neck on who is most trusted on the NHS, and the latest Survation poll, bearing in mind they were the most accurate at calling the last 2 GE results, shows Johnson is slightly more trusted.
View attachment 189058
https://www.survation.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/DM-Tables-Oct-30.pdf
Yes, it is utterly absurd to say that a government-funded service should not be an issue in an election.
The key word in that, of course, is 'bosses'. It's not nurses or doctors saying it.
it is very easy to make Swinson look like a petulant child
Swinson is just making herself look like a prat and I suspect any judge is unlikely to show her much sympathy. The next PM is going to be either Boris Johnson or Jeremy Corbyn. It could well be (especially if it's the latter) that they need the support of other party leaders to form a government but claiming she has any real chance of being the next PM is out and out delusional.
That guy isn't a civil servant though is he?Nice and neutral of the BBC to have this as their main headline all morning. Aren’t civil servants supposed to be neutral, because there’s no way this statement meets that criteria.
View attachment 189056
Nothing wounds as deeply as the truth
'top job'?Who will libdems have as leader when she gets fucked off in five weeks? Maybe umunna will finally realise his dream of the top job
No, because he won’t win the seat he is challenging in.Who will libdems have as leader when she gets fucked off in five weeks? Maybe umunna will finally realise his dream of the top job
when's East Dunbartonshire?The declaration for Cities of London and Westminster constituency is around 3:30am if you want to stay up to see him lose.
The declaration for Cities of London and Westminster constituency is around 3:30am if you want to stay up to see him lose.
About 3am.when's East Dunbartonshire?
Take you pleasures where you can get them eh?To a Tory presumably? No fun in that.
The declaration for Cities of London and Westminster constituency is around 3:30am if you want to stay up to see him lose.
Why'd they dump him there? Surely there must be better prospects.
I don't have to work the next day so I might very well do, Chuka is actually a credit to the private school system, he has that whiff of self-assured arrogance that so many of them do. He clearly feels that there is a 'name recognition vote' that will vote for him because they recognise his name. (Bit like the Eddie Murphy movie where he scammed his way into Congress because he had the same name as a real candidate who suddenly died)The declaration for Cities of London and Westminster constituency is around 3:30am if you want to stay up to see him lose.
Where in London? Twickenham already had a candidate and they didn't want to provoke a bout of infighting. Cities is an unlikely but doable target, Tory but with a strong remain bent.Why'd they dump him there? Surely there must be better prospects.