And that would be a(nother) good example of something that would make you feel better to write but actually help nobody that receives it.Ambassador Elbows report into perceptions of the diplomatic service on u75....
Fuck me, some of these chumps have no fucking clue how anything actually works.
Interesting piece.
Behind closed doors, things are very different. Each civil service uses roughly the same protocol for communication within its walls, and externally. Governed by memos, aide memoires, and note verbales, each document has a formal mechanism and meaning. While the content can vastly differ, there is one sacrosanct principle: everything is honestly written and is delivered in a secure and confidential manner. Everyone understands that what is said is not intended to go any further
Questions abound about how it was possible UK ambassador Sir Kim Darroch’s comments about the Trump administration were leaked to the Mail on Sunday. The inevitable inquest will also need to address the question of why
This will not be a civil servant seeking to illuminate a very difficult situation or to “blow a whistle” — the dysfunction of Trump’s White House is clear. Someone is seeking to score political points. But using the UK’s foreign relationships as chips within a domestic game is irresponsible in the extreme.
Leaking memos to the press seem to be the first foreign policy salvo of this contest – Jeremy Hunt heads the department, Boris Johnson headed it previously – so to what end was an ambassador deemed acceptable collateral damage to a fight?
Yes, I was n all. but now and again I say fuck it and let the truth slip outWe are trained at work to do this.
I do that face to face.Yes, I was n all. but now and again I say fuck it and let the truth slip out
I have to say the outpouring of sympathy and rage at Boris Johnson over the fate of this bumbling toff is hard to understand.I know most of it is the useful pitiful lefty whataboutery but Kabbes is right, in any business or even Government/Public Sector organisation you are told on day one to assume everything you write electronically will be seen by everyone and to ensure your writing if leaked/wrongly addressed/of use later meets the test that you'd be happy to say to the subject of it what you've written.
As a steward by the way I represent a growing number of members who face gross misconduct charges for forgetting this.
I dunno, it looks like you're the one struggling tbh. You know how you'd like it to work, but it demonstrably doesn't actually work.Ambassador Elbows report into perceptions of the diplomatic service on u75....
Fuck me, some of these chumps have no fucking clue how anything actually works.
That's not a real photo though.Trump is hardly discrete himself though. View attachment 176953
If you put in writing that one of your bosses most important client is 'inept' and they find out then you can expect gross misconduct charges.
i think we can all agree that theresa may is an inept prime ministerYou can't write inept as a descriptor for anyone unless you are comentariat and finely attuned to your paymasters whims.
I dunno, it looks like you're the one struggling tbh. You know how you'd like it to work, but it demonstrably doesn't actually work.
Is it not? Saw it first time today.That's not a real photo though.
I agree with your broad point, but from the reports I've read it appears he's called the administration 'clumsy and inept', not the man.So be it. It's not "mincing" words, it speaks to a confusion between evidence and reckons. He could state the problems and nobody would raise an eyebrow, but when he starts editorialising with words like "inept", that's where the problems start. Who says its "inept"? According to which criteria? Has this great diplomat identified any of this, or has he just made a sweeping judgement assuming everybody will know what he means? Wouldn't it be more useful all round for him to specify the actual failings rather than just label them? "Inept" isn't analysis, it's just bluster.
Yes, the whole diplomatic game reeks of entrenched privilege. It's not just Darrochs. But tough titties, maybe they should actually improve their own ineptness rather than whinge about it after they get caught out.
At the end of the day, he called Trump names. Trump responded by calling him names. Trump won. How's that for "inept"?
Is it not? Saw it first time today.
And as you both know you take a risk when you do that, especially when the subject of the truth is a twat.
If you put in writing that one of your bosses most important client is 'inept' and they find out then you can expect gross misconduct charges.
it's taken five minutes from my working day, and for that i'm appropriately gratefulWho's arsed anyway, he's a fucking ambassador, even if it was a grave injustice then still fuck him
It's one in the gob for the Eton mob.Who's arsed anyway, he's a fucking ambassador, even if it was a grave injustice then still fuck him
Why use twenty words when one sums it up perfectly.he could have reported factual truth without using words like "inept".