Additional reductions now by other means are good of course, but we should avoid implementing too draconian a set of measures to stop people from most of their driving for the sake of partially reducing pollution when it is all but certain it is going to happen anyway within a little more than a decade, and all but eliminated altogether within a generation or so.
OTM. Let's not make avoiding ecological collapse too painful.
Dropping the sarcasm, one could argue that what is seen by some as draconian is necessary as a result of very little being done by policy makers in the thirty years since the empirically-backed theory of climate change first got mainstream exposure.