The39thStep
Urban critical thinker
true...though i would still weary of staff breathing on my pint. social drinking in the park with cans/bottles seems the best option. nothing to do with pubs though
true...though i would still weary of staff breathing on my pint. social drinking in the park with cans/bottles seems the best option. nothing to do with pubs though
What they need to do (at least for venues without sizeable beer gardens) is scrap bylaws where they exist about drinking on the street, so that folks can buy a beer and wander around outside rather than being crammed indoors or on the small area of pavement where the smokers usually huddle.
There is also a fair bit of overreach with councils and police forces when it comes to no drinking areas. The standard notification is of a 'controlled drinking' area. That doesn't mean you can't drink. It means you must stop drinking if a copper tells you to. Small but important difference.Yeah, a Portuguese mate of mine used to live quite near the Holloway Road and we'd often have a can of Stella together when we bumped into each other while I was busking there, which was a fairly frequent occurrence. I couldn't leave my busking spot and he didn't always have enough money to go to the pub. Anyway, one day an old geezer came along and shouted at us for drinking beer on the street (cheeky bastard). Luis (my friend) said he couldn't understand the British attitude to street drinking, as people do that in Portugal all the time and it's not an issue - no more antisocial than drinking a can of Coke. I've always felt that banning stuff doesn't solve issues anyway, people will just carry on doing it illegally and it creates unnecessary work for police and councils who could be focusing on genuine crime/antisocial behaviour etc. It's just an excuse to fine more people to get revenue up, but that's a whole 'nother rant.
I remember asking this busybody for his ID, and he said he wasn't from the police/council. I replied "Exactly, so mind your own business then!" He didn't look pleased at that, but did back off. Me and Luis also found it amusing that he was addressing his "Drinking beer is bad" lecture directly to me and acting like Luis wasn't there (blatant double standards!) I'd had to send him packing the previous week too when he demanded to know if I had a licence to be busking there (he was equally pissed off when I kindly told him about the 2003 Licensing Act which states that busking is exempt). He's always round the Holloway Road telling people off. But I guess that's the British High Street...There is also a fair bit of overreach with councils and police forces when it comes to no drinking areas. The standard notification is of a 'controlled drinking' area. That doesn't mean you can't drink. It means you must stop drinking if a copper tells you to. Small but important difference.
It started in Coventry, irrc. Should have stayed there imo, but I can see some sense to the controlled areas where there's been trouble. But many places have tried to turn controlled drinking areas into no drinking areas, often exceeding their authority in doing so.The whole banning street drinking thing was originally more to do with drunks in shopping precincts, kids drinking in parks smashing things up on Friday and Saturday nights as I recall. Then overzealous councils and NIMBY type residents extending it to outside pubs , this was then exacerbated by the smoking ban along with the no signs /boards on pavements trend. Controlled drinking areas make some sense imo.
Yes, there needs to be common sense applied, as with all things. There's a difference between someone so pissed they can't walk and screaming abuse at passers-by, and two friends sitting with their drinks on a bench just having a chat and not bothering anybody.It started in Coventry, irrc. Should have stayed there imo, but I can see some sense to the controlled areas where there's been trouble. But many places have tried to turn controlled drinking areas into no drinking areas, often exceeding their authority in doing so.
We used them in Stockport at asb hotspotsIt started in Coventry, irrc. Should have stayed there imo, but I can see some sense to the controlled areas where there's been trouble. But many places have tried to turn controlled drinking areas into no drinking areas, often exceeding their authority in doing so.
The fear/doubt thing is everywhere, even here where they've handled the virus very well. The bars here are open but despite the governments message that there is a cautious step to normality and the fact that the Portuguese are very sociable people there isn't as many people using them at the moment . Last night the people I was sitting with were saying that they thought the bars would close again because of the virus . We sat a little further apart than we used to but there's no way you can sit two metres away and have a conversation which is what most bars are about. I've been in 3 or 4 conversations where locals are saying that the people from Porto and Lisbon shouldn't be allowed to come to the beaches here.At some point, we have to come out of lockdown. Denmark halved it's SD rule to 1 metre more than a week ago, and new cases have continued to fall there. In fact, countries like Denmark, Switzerland and Norway have all now implemented several stages of easing while their new cases have continued to fall. It can be done! It has to be done at some point.
It's also another stick to beat people with. In St Leonard's they have rules of dubious legality banning drinking on parts of the sea front. That's a place alkis often go to get drunk in peace, away from everyone. Coppers regularly patrol and move them on. It's just petty and vindictive.
Why restrict public place drinking?
Worthing has had a Designated Public Place Order for several years. The new PSPO will replace the existing order, which is required by law in order to retain the power to confiscate and dispose of alcohol where it is leading, or might lead to anti-social behaviour. It will not be an offence to drink alcohol in public in Worthing but it will be an offence to refuse to comply with a request by an authorised officer to cease drinking or surrender alcohol.
Alcohol fuelled anti-social behaviour has increasingly become an issue, predominately in Worthing Town Centre. In particular, in recent years, Worthing has experienced significant anti-social behaviour from a small number of individuals who regularly consume alcohol and congregate in the town centre. The impact on the local community, including local businesses and also visitors to the town is significant. Retaining the power to confiscate alcohol will be integral to managing the impact of alcohol driven anti-social behaviour in Worthing.
It's only a metre here in Turkey. Which is a joke because people still stand on top of you.
true...though i would still be weary of staff breathing on my pint. social drinking in the park with cans/bottles seems the best option. nothing to do with pubs though
That is an example of the way controlled drinking zones are supposed to work. It's not like that in St Leonard's. Specifically SL - it's different down the road in Hastings. And that's why I say it has dubious legality. Coppers are not reasonable about it, imo. Even in the middle of winter with nobody else about, I've seen them march up to people sat on a bench minding their own business to take their drinks off them.That's strange, because the whole of Worthing borough is subject to a 'Public Space Protection Order' covering drinking, including the beach, but the police are reasonable about it, only getting involved if there's anti-social behaviour.
From the council website -
At some point, we have to come out of lockdown. Denmark halved it's SD rule to 1 metre more than a week ago, and new cases have continued to fall there. In fact, countries like Denmark, Switzerland and Norway have all now implemented several stages of easing while their new cases have continued to fall. It can be done! It has to be done at some point.
dk which pubs you've been going to, ones at the more genteel end of the spectrum no doubtAnyone think that pubs will put on security or even enough staff to cope with people not distancing?
I know that the British public are usually well behaved and respectful in pubs but still
Spot the difference:At some point, we have to come out of lockdown. Denmark halved it's SD rule to 1 metre more than a week ago, and new cases have continued to fall there. In fact, countries like Denmark, Switzerland and Norway have all now implemented several stages of easing while their new cases have continued to fall. It can be done! It has to be done at some point.
That is an example of the way controlled drinking zones are supposed to work. It's not like that in St Leonard's. Specifically SL - it's different down the road in Hastings. And that's why I say it has dubious legality. Coppers are not reasonable about it, imo. Even in the middle of winter with nobody else about, I've seen them march up to people sat on a bench minding their own business to take their drinks off them.
did you ask the copper for a receipt?Even in the middle of winter with nobody else about, I've seen them march up to people sat on a bench minding their own business to take their drinks off them.
Well the other point to make about the places I mentioned is that the easing isn't coming after a speech to the nation by the PM the night before. It's following well-publicised plans that were put in place well in advance.At some point it does, yes, but the UK has been much worse affected than any of those countries (thanks in large part, of course, to the Johnson government's dishonesty and incompetence) and infections are still running at a pretty high level. It's premature to ease restrictions here, IMO.
I imagine that every pub will be different tbh. One of he penalties for not complying could be a license review so the stakes are high.Anyone think that pubs will put on security or even enough staff to cope with people not distancing?
I know that the British public are usually well behaved and respectful in pubs but still
Multiply the Danish figure by at least 10 to compare with the UK. But yes of course, it was far less badly hit and is currently in a far better place. It reopened schools weeks ago, mind you, when its new cases were a lot higher, and Switzerland was in a similar place to the UK currently wrt new cases and hospitalisation rates when it announced its first plans. Does the UK even have a plan beyond 'let things fall apart by themselves'?Spot the difference:
Denmark - well under 100 new cases per day for several days now.
UK - still thousands of new cases per day (and that's with insufficient testing, so several times that in reality)
Effective test, trace, isolate will need low numbers of 'suspects' otherwise it will rapidly fall apart.
Well no (even scaled per capita there is still something like an order of magnitude disparity). The relevant comparison is numbers of adequately trained persons in the test, trace, isolate roles.Multiply the Danish figure by at least 10 to compare with the UK.
I have a mask like that. For when I'm forced onto the tube.
Currently, yes. Not when they reopened the schools.Well no (even scaled per capita there is still something like an order of magnitude disparity).
With the stakes being high I would think staying 2m apart as a rule is the least the pubs can do.I imagine that every pub will be different tbh. One of he penalties for not complying could be a license review so the stakes are high.
Cant honestly see many pubs being able to run commercially with a 2m rule tbh unless they've got a very large beer garden.then youve got potential issues like can you have members of the same houshold on the same table, how do you prove they are?With the stakes being high I would think staying 2m apart as a rule is the least the pubs can do.