I don't care why he said it. My point is about why he was able to say it. In peace time, this language isn't used. It's diplomatic handshakes and fancy words. When a war is on, all bets are off and the rules go out the window. So he can (metaphorically) call Johnson a cunt for whatever reason.
Well a war is always on. A class war. And my point, which seems a century ago now (in more ways than one), is that the Left, for our reasons, might get on better if it employed more viscerally hateful language.
Johnson was massive news today. My school is not a hotbed of radicalism, but 5 of us (that's 20% of the school) watched his resignation speech. Sort of resignation speech. One teacher commented she'd have had more respect for him if he'd had some sense and resigned yesterday. I asked her why? Why would you have respect for someone who is a massive liar, adulterer, hypocrite blah blah blah blah cunt etc? The works.
Cue the most political discussion amongst a group of people in that school I've ever come across.
Visceral hatred can be cool. The works work.
Is my point.