I hope that's real and not a mash-up. If it's real, where is it because I want to be one of their customers.
It came up as a post on my FB feed. No indication of where the outlet is but I do believe it's real.
It doesn't make sense though. How can a cooked meal be oven ready?
Yes, I understand that, thank you. But it makes no sense as an advertising board for a catering establishment which makes me doubt it's veracity.It's in keeping with the source quote, which was, "We have an oven-ready deal, so let's put it in the microwave".
Yes, I understand that, thank you. But it makes no sense as an advertising board for a catering establishment which makes me doubt it's veracity.
It is at least a couple of months old.I hope that's real and not a mash-up. If it's real, where is it because I want to be one of their customers.
And inhaleThe new strain with a "possible" increase in infectivity is the Chaos Cabinets excuse for having to pull back on ludicrously optimistic Crimbo Party promises, predicated as it was on projections from Imperial - they of the 100k dead by Christmas tosh back in Nov - ZOE data does not seem to back this Cassandra's assesment. The terrified ferret faced Hancock appearing on TV, "the strain is running wild, its out of control" - what sort of imbecile is this thing? - no wonder France wants bugger all to do with us. In order to dig their sorry stupid asses out of their rigid and impossible statements, they have clutched at one speech, in which it was admitted this is in fact pretty much pure speculation - more data needed etc. Been around since Sept, no increase in deaths, infection rate showing no difference direct correlation of increase to new strain. Omnishaby "Shambles" Johnson...well he just shambles on........grabbing at any reason to claim justification as to why he's really a decent bloke!! Witless fart
Oh dear. Apologies for dragging you back into the real world...predicated as it was on projections from Imperial - they of the 100k dead by Christmas tosh back in Nov - ZOE data does not seem to back this Cassandra's assesment
And the government's inability to countOh dear. Apologies for dragging you back into the real world...
That's 100k by the end of the year modelled back in April for releasing lockdown with only shielding thereafter.
Meanwhile... Coronavirus (COVID-19) latest insights - Office for National Statistics
two weeks ago there were at least 78k COVID related deaths across the UK; plus at least another 4k since then.
We are pretty much there minus a wafer saved by a few, subsequent, half-baked, reluctant mitigations from the magical thinking school of government.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="The Kunts - Boris Johnson is a fucking cunt - YouTube" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
If you are going to post links, its a good idea to read em, - the ONS link says ," 72,546 mentioned COVID-19 on the death certificate " - where did you get the 78k figure? - dated the 22.12.2020, NOT 2 weeks agoOh dear. Apologies for dragging you back into the real world...
That's 100k by the end of the year modelled back in April for releasing lockdown with only shielding thereafter.
Meanwhile... Coronavirus (COVID-19) latest insights - Office for National Statistics
two weeks ago there were at least 78k COVID related deaths across the UK; plus at least another 4k since then.
We are pretty much there minus a wafer saved by a few, subsequent, half-baked, reluctant mitigations from the magical thinking school of government.
Clue: The ONS publish data for England and Wales.If you are going to post links, its a good idea to read em, - the ONS link says ," 72,546 mentioned COVID-19 on the death certificate " - where did you get the 78k figure? - dated the 22.12.2020, NOT 2 weeks ago
So three days out from Christmas we are still nearly 30k short, not as you claim pretty much matched
Click on the tab marked "Deaths" on the link you posted, you will get the latest figure as quoted above
The original pub of the Imperial Data was March-ish, but Imperial them selves published an analysis of their data by Endinburgh Uni that backed the March conclusions 08.10.2020 BMJ study confirms Imperial COVID-19 projections | Imperial News | Imperial College London - so yeah they were still backing their position - so have another little think eh?
Dont bother trying to "drag me back" into other aspects of your "genius" analytical methods, mine was a spur of the moment rant which proves to be reasonably accurate, you had time to think and produced tosh - Dont try to be a smart arse when you cant even be bothered read properly are obviously just an Arse
WTF? Cryptic clues? In what way does your "statement" change the deaths reading to match your claims?Clue: The ONS publish data for England and Wales.